T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
RE\u015e\u0130T DURGUN BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/75342)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Re\u015fit DURGUN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yanl\u0131\u015f yorumlanarak ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresinin hatal\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131 ve hapis cezas\u0131ndan mahsup edilmesi gereken s\u00fcrelerin eksik hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmemesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Malatya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 21\/3\/2017 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve 27\/3\/2017 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan d\u00fczenledi\u011fi 30\/3\/2017 tarihli iddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, Mahkemenin 2\/6\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131 ile serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Mahkeme 28\/6\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 13 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…san\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahl\u0131 FET\u00d6 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00dcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etti\u011fi sabit olmakla eylemine uyan TCK’n\u0131n 314\/3 ve TCK’n\u0131n 220\/7 maddesi yollamas\u0131yla TCK’n\u0131n 314\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince su\u00e7un sebep ve saikleri, su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f \u015fekli, zarar ve tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak takdiren 5 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n
Yasal \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fundan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cezas\u0131ndan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 220\/7 maddesi gere\u011fince yap\u0131lan yard\u0131m\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve miktar\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak takdiren 2\/3 oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131larak 1 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 5\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince 1\/2 oran\u0131nda art\u0131\u015f yap\u0131larak 1 y\u0131l 18 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 lehine takdiri hafifletici neden kabul edilerek cezas\u0131ndan TCK’n\u0131n 62\/1\u2019inci maddesi gere\u011fince 1\/6 oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131larak 1 y\u0131l 13 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 58\/9. maddesi y\u00f6n\u00fcyle yasal \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan uygulanmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015fahsi h\u00fcrriyeti s\u0131n\u0131rlama sonucunu do\u011furan b\u00fct\u00fcn haller nedeniyle ge\u00e7irmi\u015f oldu\u011fu s\u00fcrelerin TCK\u2019n\u0131n 63\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince cezas\u0131ndan mahsubuna, [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
6. S\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcm, ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi ile 12\/4\/2019 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesi sonras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 8\/7\/2019 tarihinde ceza infaz kurumuna al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu 24\/10\/2019 tarihinde Mahkemeye ba\u015fvurarak 17\/10\/2019 tarihli ve 7188 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun gere\u011fince temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 24\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesi 16\/2\/2022 tarihinde temyiz kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu 15\/4\/2022 tarihinde ceza infaz kurumuna yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnameye g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi 5\/5\/2023, hak ederek tahliye tarihi ise 10\/11\/2023’t\u00fcr. M\u00fcddetnamede infaz t\u00fcr\u00fc olarak 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 107. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. M\u00fcddetnamede ayr\u0131ca hapis cezas\u0131ndan mahsup edilecek s\u00fcrelere ili\u015fkin bilgilere yer verilmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun 21\/3\/2017-27\/3\/2017 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 6 g\u00fcn, 27\/3\/2017-2\/6\/2017 tarihleri aras\u0131nda tutuklu kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 67 g\u00fcn ve 8\/7\/2019-24\/10\/2019 tarihleri aras\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumunda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulundu\u011fu 108 g\u00fcn olmak \u00fczere toplam 181 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre, hapis cezas\u0131ndan mahsup edilecektir.<\/p>\n
11. S\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcddetname ba\u015fvurucuya 25\/4\/2022 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fcddetnameye Malatya \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (H\u00e2kimlik) nezdinde 26\/4\/2022 tarihinde itiraz etmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucu; \u00f6ncelikle m\u00fcddetnamenin iki g\u00fcn eksik d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011finden ceza almamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresinin belirlenmesinde 2\/3 yerine 3\/4 oran\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. H\u00e2kimlik 28\/4\/2022 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fi su\u00e7un 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu’nun 3. maddesi gere\u011fince ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u oldu\u011fu ve bu su\u00e7 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 17. maddesi gere\u011fince 3\/4 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, H\u00e2kimlik karar\u0131na 24\/5\/2022 tarihinde itiraz etmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde, tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcrelerin eksik hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini ve mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na konu su\u00e7un hatal\u0131 olarak 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda kabul edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130tiraz mercii, 6\/6\/2022 tarihinde infaza konu su\u00e7un ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme s\u00fcresinin hesab\u0131nda bir hata olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131n reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu, itiraz\u0131n reddi karar\u0131n\u0131 10\/6\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 8\/7\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
15. Komisyon, adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
A. \u0130lgili Mevzuat<\/p>\n
16. 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun “Tan\u0131mlar” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 6. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (j) bendi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“\u00d6rg\u00fct mensubu su\u00e7lu deyiminden; bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kuran, y\u00f6neten, \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131lan veya \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na di\u011ferleriyle birlikte veya tek ba\u015f\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyen ki\u015fi, anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
17. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 220. maddesinin eylem tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00e2li \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) Kanunun su\u00e7 sayd\u0131\u011f\u0131 fiilleri i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kuranlar veya y\u00f6netenler, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn yap\u0131s\u0131, sahip bulundu\u011fu \u00fcye say\u0131s\u0131 ile ara\u00e7 ve gere\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ama\u00e7 su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flemeye elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131 halinde, iki y\u0131ldan alt\u0131 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Ancak, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00fcye say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n en az \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fi olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(2) Su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla kurulmu\u015f olan \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olanlar, bir y\u0131ldan \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(3) \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn silahl\u0131 olmas\u0131 halinde, yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kralara g\u00f6re verilecek ceza d\u00f6rtte birinden yar\u0131s\u0131na kadar art\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(4) \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesi halinde, ayr\u0131ca bu su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 da cezaya h\u00fckmolunur.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(5) \u00d6rg\u00fct y\u00f6neticileri, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flenen b\u00fct\u00fcn su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 ayr\u0131ca fail olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(6) (De\u011fi\u015fik: 2\/7\/2012 \u2013 6352\/85 md.) \u00d6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyen ki\u015fi, ayr\u0131ca \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olmak su\u00e7undan da cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. \u00d6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olmak su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 verilecek ceza yar\u0131s\u0131na kadar indirilebilir.(Ek c\u00fcmle: 11\/4\/2013-6459\/11 md.) Bu f\u0131kra h\u00fckm\u00fc sadece silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctler hakk\u0131nda uygulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(7) (De\u011fi\u015fik: 2\/7\/2012 \u2013 6352\/85 md.) \u00d6rg\u00fct i\u00e7indeki hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131ya dahil olmamakla birlikte, \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m eden ki\u015fi, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. \u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011finden dolay\u0131 verilecek ceza, yap\u0131lan yard\u0131m\u0131n niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re \u00fc\u00e7te birine kadar indirilebilir.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(8) \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn cebir, \u015fiddet veya tehdit i\u00e7eren y\u00f6ntemlerini me\u015fru g\u00f6sterecek veya \u00f6vecek ya da bu y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik edecek \u015fekilde propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapan ki\u015fi, bir y\u0131ldan \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Bu su\u00e7un bas\u0131n ve yay\u0131n yolu ile i\u015flenmesi halinde, verilecek ceza yar\u0131 oran\u0131nda art\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
18. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Sil\u00e2hl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 314. maddesi eylem tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00e2li \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) Bu k\u0131sm\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc ve be\u015finci b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinde yer alan su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla, silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct kuran veya y\u00f6neten ki\u015fi, on y\u0131ldan onbe\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(2) Birinci f\u0131krada tan\u0131mlanan \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olanlara, be\u015f y\u0131ldan on y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 verilir.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(3) Su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcmler, bu su\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan aynen uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
19. 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusu” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 2. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Birinci maddede belirlenen ama\u00e7lara ula\u015fmak i\u00e7in meydana getirilmi\u015f \u00f6rg\u00fctlerin mensubu olup da, bu ama\u00e7lar do\u011frultusunda di\u011ferleri ile beraber veya tek ba\u015f\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyen veya ama\u00e7lanan su\u00e7u i\u015flemese dahi \u00f6rg\u00fctlerin mensubu olan ki\u015fi ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusudur.<\/p>\n
Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne mensup olmasa dahi \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyenler de ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusu say\u0131l\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
20. 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 3. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(De\u011fi\u015fik: 29\/6\/2006-5532\/2 md.) 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun 302, 307, 309, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315 ve 320 nci maddeleri ile 310 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131d\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
21. 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(De\u011fi\u015fik: 29\/6\/2006-5532\/12 md.) Bu Kanun kapsam\u0131na giren su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbm olanlar hakk\u0131nda, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme ve denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 107 nci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 108 inci maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r. (Ek c\u00fcmle:14\/4\/2020-7242\/65 md.) Ancak, s\u00fcreli hapis cezalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131, d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak uygulan\u0131r…”<\/p>\n
22. 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 107. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Su\u00e7 i\u015flemek i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fct kurmak veya y\u00f6netmek ya da \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00e2linde; a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olanlar otuzalt\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olanlar otuz y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131, s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olanlar cezalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te ikisini infaz kurumunda \u00e7ektikleri takdirde, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeden yararlanabilirler. (Ek c\u00fcmle:14\/4\/2020-7242\/48 md.) Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7te ikiden fazla olan su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise tabi olduklar\u0131 ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131 uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131<\/p>\n
23. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesinin 1\/12\/2023 tarihli ve E.2023\/5799; K.2023\/7382 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“7. Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte, \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 220 inci maddesinin yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 314 nc\u00fc maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 delaleti ile 324 nc\u00fc maddenin ikinci, 220 nci maddenin yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 5 inci ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 62 nci maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 1 y\u0131l 13 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ve verilen bu karar kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Kesinle\u015fen 1 y\u0131l 13 ay hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 amac\u0131yla 15.03.2021 tarihinde ceza infaz kurumuna al\u0131nan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 15.03.2021 tarihli m\u00fcddetnameye g\u00f6re, cezas\u0131ndan3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 17 nci maddesi uyar\u0131nca \u00bc oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lmak suretiyle, \u015fartla tahliye tarihinin 02.1.2022, bihakk\u0131n tahliye tarihinin ise 09.04.2023 olarak belirlendi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. Hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131ya dahil olmamakla birlikte ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m eden san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verilen cezan\u0131n 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 delaleti ile 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 107 nci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince infaz edilmesi gerekmekte olup, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 17 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 65 inci maddesi ile eklenen ek c\u00fcmle dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 48 inci maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik ile ter\u00f6r su\u00e7undan mahkum olan yeti\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin \u015fartla tahliyeden yararlanabilmeleri i\u00e7in ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irmeleri gereken s\u00fcre a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan lehe ya da aleyhe bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olup, de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00f6ncesi ve sonras\u0131 duruma g\u00f6releti\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00be n\u00fc ceza infaz kurumunda iyi halli olarak infaz etmesi durumunda \u015fartla tahliyeden yararlanmaya hak kazanabilece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n
10. Somut olayda, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanun\u2019un 17 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nca at\u0131f yap\u0131lan, 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 107 nci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00f6ncesi d\u00fczenleme dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc hakk\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 58 inci maddesinin 9 uncu f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn m\u00fcddetnameye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 107 nci maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 1\/3 oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lmak suretiyle d\u00fczenlenecek m\u00fcddetnameye g\u00f6re infaz\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u0130nfaz Hakimli\u011fince verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 Cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine reddine dair itiraz merciince verilen karar Kanun\u2019a ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebi a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu sebeple yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.”<\/p>\n
24. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesinin 15\/2\/2021 tarihli ve E.2019\/1078; K.2021\/1330 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Benzer bir olay sebebiyle Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 15\/01\/2018 tarihli ve 2017\/2634 esas, 2018\/16 karar say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, ancak \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu su\u00e7lu hakk\u0131nda uygulanabilen ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6\/1-j maddesinde tan\u0131mlan\u0131p tahdidi olarak say\u0131lan; su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kuran, y\u00f6neten, \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131lan\/\u00fcye olan veya \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyenlerden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu say\u0131lmayan, hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131ya dahil olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m eden san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verilen cezan\u0131n 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17\/1. maddesi delaleti ile 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 107\/4 ve 108. maddeleri gere\u011fince infaz edilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, itiraz\u0131n reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kabul\u00fcne kararverilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle […] Erzurum 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 11\/10\/2018 tarihli […] karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’nin 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca KANUN YARARINA BOZULMASINA [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
25. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 15\/1\/2018 tarihli ve E.2017\/2634; K.2018\/16 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Ancak \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu su\u00e7lu hakk\u0131nda uygulanabilen ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 6\/1-j maddesinde tan\u0131mlan\u0131p tahdidi olarak say\u0131lan; su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc kuran, y\u00f6neten, \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131lan\/\u00fcye olan veya \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyenlerden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu say\u0131lmayan, hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131ya dahil olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m eden san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verilen cezan\u0131n 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 17\/1. maddesi delaleti ile 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 107\/4 ve 108. maddeleri gere\u011fince infaz edilmesi gerekmekte ise de \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde TCK’n\u0131n 58\/9. maddesinin tatbik edilmesi [bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.]<\/p>\n
III. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru formunda \u00f6zetle;<\/p>\n
i. Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7undan hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fini, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnamede ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresinin \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeleri ile ayn\u0131 olacak \u015fekildebelirlendi\u011fini, an\u0131lan s\u00fcrenin belirlenmesinde 2\/3 yerine 3\/4 oran\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve m\u00fcddetnameye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz \u015fekilde reddedildi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
ii. Hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnamede mahsup edilmesi gereken s\u00fcrenin iki g\u00fcn eksik hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcddetnameye bu hususta yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n H\u00e2kimlik ve itiraz mercii taraf\u0131ndan herhangi bir \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fini beyan ederek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 ile silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkeleri ile ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
27. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde esasa ili\u015fkin olarak Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin incelenmesinin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsamda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
A. Ko\u015fullu Sal\u0131verilme S\u00fcresinin Hatal\u0131 Hesaplanmas\u0131 Nedeniyle Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
29. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda herkesin ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu ilke olarak konduktan sonra ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131nda \u015fekil ve \u015fartlar\u0131 kanunda g\u00f6sterilmek kayd\u0131yla ki\u015filerin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131labilece\u011fi durumlar s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015finin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvenlik hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 ancak Anayasa’n\u0131n an\u0131lan maddesi kapsam\u0131nda belirlenen durumlardan herhangi birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde s\u00f6z konusu olabilir (Murat Narman, B. No: 2012\/1137, 2\/7\/2013, \u00a7 42).<\/p>\n
30. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ilk istisnas\u0131 “mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi” olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca verilecek mahk\u00fbmiyet kararlar\u0131n\u0131n sonucu olarak hapis cezas\u0131 veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin uygulanmas\u0131 ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali kabul edilmeyecektir. Di\u011fer taraftan su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesine ba\u011fl\u0131 tutma kapsam\u0131nda olan durumdan farkl\u0131 olarak an\u0131lan istisna bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak tutmay\u0131 ifade etmektedir (Tahir Canan (2), B. No: 2013\/839, 5\/11\/2014, \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n
31. Bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesi a\u00e7\u0131k bir h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7ermemektedir. Ancak Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin amac\u0131 ki\u015fileri keyf\u00ee bir \u015fekilde h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 korumak olup maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen istisnai h\u00e2llerde ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyetine getirilecek s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n da maddenin amac\u0131na uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir (Abdullah \u00dcnal, B. No: 2012\/1094, 7\/3\/2014, \u00a7 38). Bir kimsenin mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi kapsam\u0131nda h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenebilmesi i\u00e7in her \u015feyden \u00f6nce h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirinin bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilmesi, ikinci olarak yerine getirilecek karar\u0131n h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerine ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbiri i\u00e7ermeyen bir karara dayan\u0131larak bir kimsenin h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Son olarak h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lman\u0131n mahkemece verilen h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirinin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmamas\u0131 gerekir (Ercan Bucak (2), B. No: 2014\/11651, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7 40; \u015eaban Dal, B. No: 2014\/2891, 16\/2\/2017 \u00a7 32; \u00c7.\u00d6. [GK], B. No: 2014\/5927, 19\/7\/2018 \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkeme karar\u0131yla tespit edilmesine ra\u011fmen hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyelerinin tabi oldu\u011fu infaz rejiminin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvuruya konu hukuki meselenin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde belirleyici olan husus ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetine esas al\u0131nan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7unun 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131na d\u00e2hil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 2. maddesine g\u00f6re ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne mensup olmasa dahi \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyenler de ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusu say\u0131l\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 19). Yine ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 3. maddesi ile 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un -di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra- 314. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen su\u00e7lar da ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131 olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 20).<\/p>\n
33. Somut olayda Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu kararda sevk maddeleri olarak 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 314. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 220. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Kanun’un 314. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcmler silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de aynen uygulanacakt\u0131r. Kanun’un silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 314. maddesinde silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7u ayr\u0131ca d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015f ancak su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma su\u00e7unun d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 220. maddeye a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a at\u0131f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan Kanun’un 220. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7u d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kanun’un 220. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile birlikte silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 314. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Dahas\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar i\u00e7eri\u011finden ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen su\u00e7un ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flendi\u011finin kabul edildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvurucunun 15\/4\/2022 tarihli m\u00fcddetnameye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz, H\u00e2kimlik taraf\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyete esas su\u00e7un 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 3. maddesi gere\u011fince ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u oldu\u011fu ve bu su\u00e7 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 17. maddesi gere\u011fince 3\/4 olarak belirlendi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Somut olayda gerek mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 veren Mahkeme gerekse m\u00fcddetnameye itiraz\u0131 reddeden H\u00e2kimlik taraf\u0131ndan silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7unun 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihad\u0131 da an\u0131lan su\u00e7un 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresinin tespitinde ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 17. maddesi uyar\u0131nca3\/4 oran\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndedir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 23-25).<\/p>\n
35. Sonu\u00e7 olarak yukar\u0131da yer verilen yasal d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda mahkemelerce ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar\u0131n mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihatlarla uyumlu oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi ve itiraz mercii kararlar\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131, kanun maddeleri g\u00f6zetilerek herhangi bir keyf\u00eeli\u011fe meydan vermeden belirlenmi\u015ftir. Belirtilen bu hususlar do\u011frultusunda ba\u015fvurucunun hukuk sistemince belirlenen \u00e7er\u00e7evede h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun kalmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuki bir temelinin bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k bir ihlal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
36. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Mahsup Edilecek S\u00fcrenin Eksik Hesaplanmas\u0131 Nedeniyle Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
37. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 47. maddesinin (3),48. maddesinin (1) ve (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bireysel ba\u015fvuruda, kamu g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn neden oldu\u011fu iddia edilen ihlale dair olaylarda bireysel ba\u015fvuru kapsam\u0131ndaki haklar\u0131n ne \u015fekilde ihlal edildi\u011fi ve buna ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7eler ve deliller a\u00e7\u0131klanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
38. \u0130hlal iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin delilleri sunma ve temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yerine getirilmedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla iddialar\u0131n temellendirilmedi\u011fi durumlarda kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilebilir (Cemal G\u00fcnsel [GK], B. No: 2016\/12900, 21\/1\/2021).<\/p>\n
39. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnameden ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak ceza infaz kurumunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrenin takvim g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131 olarak de\u011fil ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irilen 24 saatlik dilimler esas al\u0131narak hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ancak hapis cezas\u0131ndan mahsup edilmesi gereken s\u00fcrenin iki g\u00fcn eksik hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren ba\u015fvurucu, hesap hatas\u0131n\u0131n ne \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, mahsuba konu s\u00fcrenin hatal\u0131 hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 somut olgularla ortaya koyamam\u0131\u015f ve ihlal iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin delillerini sunma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmemi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle s\u00f6z konusu iddian\u0131n temellendirilmemi\u015f \u015fik\u00e2yet kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
40. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresinin hatal\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Mahsup edilecek s\u00fcrenin eksik hesaplanmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 20\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 20\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/75342 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 RE\u015e\u0130T DURGUN BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/75342) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Re\u015fit DURGUN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yanl\u0131\u015f yorumlanarak ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresinin hatal\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131 ve hapis cezas\u0131ndan mahsup edilmesi gereken s\u00fcrelerin eksik hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin itirazlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmemesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Malatya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 21\/3\/2017 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve 27\/3\/2017 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan d\u00fczenledi\u011fi 30\/3\/2017 tarihli iddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, Mahkemenin 2\/6\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131 ile serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5. Mahkeme 28\/6\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 13 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fcn ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir: “…san\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahl\u0131 FET\u00d6 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00dcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etti\u011fi sabit olmakla eylemine uyan TCK’n\u0131n …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21515","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n