T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
OSMAN GEY\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/44137)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Osman GEY\u0130K<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l d\u00f6neminde asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131yla asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc kaybeden ba\u015fvurucunun ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2lin bitmesinden sonra yeniden asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fc verilmesi talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte ba\u015fvurucu, Astsubay Meslek Y\u00fcksekokulu \u00f6\u011frencisidir.<\/p>\n
3. T\u00fcrkiye 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee bir darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Devletin yetkili organlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tehdit de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131larak demokratik anayasal d\u00fczene, bireylerin temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerine, mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fe y\u00f6nelik tehdit olu\u015fturan t\u00fcm ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine ve illegal yap\u0131lanmalara kar\u015f\u0131 tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar i\u00e7in bkz. Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017).<\/p>\n
4. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 25\/7\/2016 tarihli ve 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mezk\u00fbr KHK’n\u0131n 105. maddesinde asker\u00ee okullarda \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden \u00f6\u011frencilerin durumlar\u0131na uygun okulara nakledilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun e\u011fitim g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc okul da an\u0131lan d\u00fczenleme kapsam\u0131nda kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucunun okulla ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilerek ba\u015fka bir okula nakli sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2lin sona ermesinden sonra asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn yeniden verilmesi talebiyle idareye ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015f, bu talebi z\u0131mnen reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu, idari yarg\u0131da iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130dare Mahkemesi; ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fcniversite s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerle\u015ftirme puan\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulunca ba\u015fka bir \u00fcniversiteye yerle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, g\u00fcvenlikle ilgili \u00f6zel ve \u00f6nemli bir kamu hizmetini daimi olarak sunmak zorunda olan idarenin bu konuda ba\u011fl\u0131 yetkisi oldu\u011funu, bu hususta yeni bir kanuni d\u00fczenleme bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2lin sona erdi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn yeniden kazan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar, istinaf incelemesinden ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu nihai karar\u0131 13\/7\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f, 11\/8\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Komisyonca, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. E\u011fitim Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; sadece bir KHK h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayan\u0131larak asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sona erdi\u011fini, e\u011fitimini tamamlayabilmi\u015f olsayd\u0131 astsubay olarak i\u015fe ba\u015flayabilece\u011fini, kendisinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleriyle herhangi bir ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu sebeple de ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2lin sona ermesinin ard\u0131ndan asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn yeniden sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fka bir \u00fcniversiteye ge\u00e7i\u015f hakk\u0131 verilmesinin ma\u011fduriyetini gidermedi\u011fini, ekonomik anlamda kayb\u0131 bulundu\u011funu belirterek e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin \u00f6z\u00fc, yeni faaliyete ge\u00e7en asker\u00ee okullara eski asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fc dikkate al\u0131narak yeniden kay\u0131t imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmamas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucunun yukar\u0131da belirtilen iddialar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 42. maddesinde koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nan e\u011fitim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011frenim seviyesini de kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Hikmet Balabano\u011flu, B. No: 2012\/1334, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 28; \u0130hsan Asutay, B. No: 2012\/606, 20\/2\/2014, \u00a7 36), belli bir zamanda mevcut olan e\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131na eri\u015fimin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Mehmet Re\u015fit Arslan ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 68), kamu otoritelerine bireyin e\u011fitim ve \u00f6\u011frenim almas\u0131n\u0131 engellememe \u015feklinde negatif \u00f6dev y\u00fckledi\u011fine (Adem \u00d6\u011f\u00fct ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/20527, 22\/11\/2017, \u00a7 44; Y\u00fcksel Baran, B. No: 2012\/782, 26\/6\/2014, \u00a7 36) karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6neme ra\u011fmen e\u011fitim hakk\u0131, niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi baz\u0131 d\u00fczenlemelere tabidir. \u015e\u00fcphesiz e\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen kurallar, toplumun ihtiya\u00e7 ve kaynaklar\u0131 ile e\u011fitimin farkl\u0131 d\u00fczeylerine has \u00f6zelliklere g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fiklik g\u00f6sterebilir. Bu nedenle devletin bu konuda yapaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenleme ve uygulamalarda belli bir takdir alan\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekir (\u00dcnal Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, B. No: 2013\/6776, 5\/11\/2014, \u00a7 42; Sava\u015f Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m, B. No: 2013\/6258, 10\/6\/2015, \u00a7 42). Devletin bu takdir alan\u0131 e\u011fitim kurumunun seviyesi y\u00fckseldik\u00e7e artar, buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k e\u011fitimin birey ve toplum bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nemine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak azal\u0131r (Mehmet Re\u015fit Arslan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/583, 10\/12\/2014, \u00a7 67). Devletin sahip oldu\u011fu takdir yetkisi, toplumun ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zeterek var olan e\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rmay\u0131 veya stat\u00fclerinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapmay\u0131 da kapsamaktad\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcphesiz devletin belirtilen bu takdir alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde hareket ederken me\u015fru bir amaca dayanan de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yapmas\u0131 da kendisinden beklenecektir.<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu; ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) d\u00f6neminde asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak kaybetti\u011fi asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn, OHAL d\u00f6neminin sona ermesiyle idarece yeniden tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ve yar\u0131m kalan e\u011fitiminin tamamlanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmektedir. Bu durumda \u00f6ncelikle devletin bu konuda bireylerin ma\u011fduriyetlerini telafi edici birtak\u0131m mekanizmalar kurup kurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
14. OHAL tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK uyar\u0131nca asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ve bu okullardaki asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilerin de \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fclerine son verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte s\u00f6z konusu stat\u00fc kayb\u0131ndan etkilenen bireylerin e\u011fitim haklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden telafi edici bir mekanizma kurulmu\u015f, bu kapsamda asker\u00ee okullara giri\u015f i\u00e7in daha \u00f6nce al\u0131nan \u00fcniversite giri\u015f puan\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fka y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim programlar\u0131na kay\u0131t hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 4). Nitekim ba\u015fvurucu yar\u0131m kalan \u00f6nlisans e\u011fitimini bu yasal de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe dayal\u0131 olarak ve kendi tercih etti\u011fi \u0130n\u00f6n\u00fc \u00dcniversitesi Arapgir Meslek Y\u00fcksekokulu Otomotiv Teknolojisi B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde tamamlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Bu durumda devletin o g\u00fcn\u00fcn ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak okulla ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilenlerin e\u011fitimlerini tamamlayabilmeleri i\u00e7in telafi edici bir mekanizma sundu\u011fu, bu mekanizman\u0131n yan\u0131nda bu durumdaki ki\u015fileri yeniden asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci stat\u00fcs\u00fcne almak gibi pozitif bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nitekim do\u011fas\u0131 gere\u011fi bu stat\u00fc, ya\u015f ve fiziksel yeterlilik gibi birtak\u0131m niteliklere sahip olmay\u0131 gerektirdi\u011finden aradan ge\u00e7en zaman\u0131n bu niteliklerde de\u011fi\u015fime yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 da bir ger\u00e7ektir. Ancak bu stat\u00fcn\u00fcn gerektirdi\u011fi ko\u015fullar\u0131 h\u00e2len ta\u015f\u0131yanlar\u0131n, yeniden asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci olabilmek i\u00e7in -eski asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcne dayal\u0131 bir hak talebi olmaks\u0131z\u0131n- herhangi bir aday gibi ilgili idareye ba\u015fvuru yapmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da belirtmek gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Sonu\u00e7 olarak devletin asker\u00ee e\u011fitimi d\u00fczenleme ve profesyonel asker\u00ee hizmete giri\u015f ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemede olduk\u00e7a geni\u015f bir takdir pay\u0131 oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. \u00d6zellikle bir darbe giri\u015fimi sonras\u0131nda bu alanda yap\u0131lan d\u00fczenlemelerin daha b\u00fcy\u00fck bir hassasiyet gerektirece\u011fi de a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun e\u011fitim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesince kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda bir ihlal bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k olan ba\u015fvurular a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun kabul edilebilir (Hikmet Balabano\u011flu, \u00a7 24).<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden yak\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvurular ile benzer nitelikte olan Veysi Ado ([GK] B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede Anayasa Mahkemesi 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe g\u00f6re 9\/3\/2023 tarihi (bu tarih d\u00e2hil) itibar\u0131yla derdest olan, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 neticesine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut ba\u015fvurularda da an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik kriterleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. E\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/44137 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 OSMAN GEY\u0130K BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/44137) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Osman GEY\u0130K \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l d\u00f6neminde asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131yla asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc kaybeden ba\u015fvurucunun ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2lin bitmesinden sonra yeniden asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fc verilmesi talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte ba\u015fvurucu, Astsubay Meslek Y\u00fcksekokulu \u00f6\u011frencisidir. 3. T\u00fcrkiye 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee bir darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Devletin yetkili organlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tehdit de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131larak demokratik anayasal d\u00fczene, bireylerin temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerine, mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fe y\u00f6nelik tehdit olu\u015fturan t\u00fcm ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine ve illegal yap\u0131lanmalara kar\u015f\u0131 tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar i\u00e7in bkz. Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017). 4. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 25\/7\/2016 tarihli ve 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mezk\u00fbr KHK’n\u0131n 105. maddesinde asker\u00ee okullarda \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden \u00f6\u011frencilerin durumlar\u0131na uygun okulara nakledilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. 5. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n