T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
POORYA PARVA BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2018\/27830)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Gizem Ceren DEM\u0130R KO\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Poorya PARVA<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ceren \u00c7\u0130LO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalma riski bulunan \u00fclkeye s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilme karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, Anayasa Mahkemesinin tedbir karar\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilme nedeniyle bireysel ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 26\/9\/2018 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinin idari y\u00f6nden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n incelemesinden sonra Komisyona sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Birinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Komisyonunca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130ran \u0130slam Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131 olup din de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi nedeniyle \u00fclkesinde idam cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lma riski bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. 2017\/39001 numaral\u0131 dosyaya kaydedilen ba\u015fvuruda 13\/12\/2017 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin ge\u00e7ici olarak durdurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda 4\/11\/2020 tarihinde -istenilen bilgi ve belgelerin g\u00f6nderilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle- ba\u015fvurunun reddine ve tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verilen s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015fleminin Anayasa Mahkemesince tedbiren durdurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edildi\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla incelemeye konu bireysel ba\u015fvuruyu yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. \u0130lgili idareden istenilen belgelerden ba\u015fvurucunun 19\/3\/2018 tarihinde \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca kay\u0131tlar\u0131n incelenmesinden ba\u015fvurucunun 24\/3\/2020 tarihli bir \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n daha bulundu\u011fu tespit edilmektedir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesine dair al\u0131nan karar\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan idari davada dilek\u00e7e ret karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, dilek\u00e7enin yenilenmesi \u00fczerine idareden al\u0131nan savunma dilek\u00e7esi 14\/5\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu vekiline tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan savunma dilek\u00e7esinde, ba\u015fvurucunun 19\/3\/2018 tarihinde r\u0131zas\u0131yla \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi ve \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015fa dair belgenin de evraka eklendi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan 10\/9\/2018 tarihinde haberdar oldu\u011funu ve m\u00fcvekkilinden haber alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 26\/9\/2018 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Adli Yard\u0131m Talebi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmayan adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili; ba\u015fvurucunun Hristiyanl\u0131k dinine mensup oldu\u011funu, \u00fclkesine geri g\u00f6nderilmesinin ba\u015fvurucunun hayat\u0131 \u00fczerinde tehlike olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
15. Yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n \u00fclkeye giri\u015fleri, \u00fclkede ikamet etmeleri ve \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmalar\u0131,uluslararas\u0131 hukukta da kabul edildi\u011fi \u00fczere devletin egemenlik yetkisi kapsam\u0131ndad\u0131r (A.A. ve A.A. [GK], B. No: 2015\/3941, 1\/3\/2017, \u00a7 54).<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, yasakla ilgili herhangi bir istisna da kabul edilmemi\u015ftir. \u201cTemel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 15. madde ise sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hallerde de sava\u015f hukukuna uygun fiiller sonucu meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcmler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ile maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koyan s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen d\u00fczenlemelere g\u00f6re bir yabanc\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilece\u011fi \u00fclkede Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir muameleye u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda ger\u00e7ek bir riskle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalaca\u011f\u0131na inan\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in esasl\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerin g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde yabanc\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edebilir. Zira b\u00f6yle bir durumda yabanc\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele riskiyle kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmas\u0131 devletin tutumunun do\u011frudan bir sonucudur (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. A.A. ve A.A., \u00a7\u00a7 55, 56). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bir yabanc\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilece\u011fi \u00fclkede \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclece\u011fi veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda ger\u00e7ek bir riskle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015faca\u011f\u0131na inan\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in esasl\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler bulunmas\u0131 durumunda devlet, bu yabanc\u0131y\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 etmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alt\u0131ndad\u0131r (Masoud Taleb\u0131, B. No: 2023\/26088, 19\/3\/2024, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
17. S\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi h\u00e2linde k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia eden yabanc\u0131, ilke olarak, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilece\u011fi \u00fclkede k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frayaca\u011f\u0131 konusunda ger\u00e7ek bir riskle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalaca\u011f\u0131na inan\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in esasl\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler bulundu\u011funu kan\u0131tlayabilecek delilleri idari ve yarg\u0131sal mercilere sunmal\u0131d\u0131r.Bu do\u011frultuda yabanc\u0131, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilece\u011fi\u00fclkede var oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele riskinin ne oldu\u011funu makul \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klamal\u0131 ve varsa bu iddiay\u0131 destekleyen bilgi ve belgeleri ibraz etmelidir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz.A.A. ve A.A., \u00a7 68).<\/p>\n
18. Men\u015fe \u00fclke \u0130ran’\u0131n durumuna bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda -A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131na da yans\u0131yan insan haklar\u0131 raporlar\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere- M\u00fcsl\u00fcman iken Hristiyanl\u0131\u011fa ge\u00e7mi\u015f s\u0131radan din de\u011fi\u015ftirenlerin durumlar\u0131 ile Hristiyanl\u0131k dininin propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapanlar\u0131n veya bu \u015fekilde g\u00f6r\u00fclenlerin \u0130ranl\u0131 yetkililerce farkl\u0131 muamele ve yapt\u0131r\u0131mlara tabi tutuldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. \u00d6zellikle ikinci grupta yer alanlar\u0131n kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n daha fazla dikkatini \u00e7ekti\u011fi ve daha s\u0131k\u0131 takip alt\u0131nda olduklar\u0131, ceza veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalabildikleri g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir (Masoud Taleb\u0131, \u00a7 64). Somut dosyada ba\u015fvurucu din de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmekle birlikte bu iddias\u0131n\u0131 destekler herhangi bir veri sunmam\u0131\u015f,Hristiyanl\u0131k dininin propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da din de\u011fi\u015ftirdi\u011fi hususunun \u0130ran kamu makamlar\u0131nca bilinebilir oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klama da yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi halinde ger\u00e7ek bir risk alt\u0131nda oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin somut dayanaklar ortaya koyamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n savunulabilir nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n savunulabilir nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc geri d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f belgesi zorla imzalatt\u0131r\u0131larak s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edildi\u011fini dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesinin tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmektedir.<\/p>\n
21. 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 47. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 64. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi bireysel ba\u015fvurunun, ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvuru yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise ihlalin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
22. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucunun 19\/3\/2018 tarihinde \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edildi\u011fini 10\/9\/2018 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini beyan etmekle birlikte ba\u015fvurucunun, en ge\u00e7 \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte ihlal iddias\u0131na konu i\u015flemden haberdar oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bireysel ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu ve\/veya vekili olmas\u0131 fark etmeksizin hangisi taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6\u011frenilirse \u00f6\u011frenilsin ilk \u00f6\u011frenilme tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flamaktad\u0131r (Kadir Turgut, B. No: 2014\/4985, 6\/7\/2017, \u00a725). An\u0131lan durumda ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n kendi r\u0131zas\u0131 ile olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n\u0131 en ge\u00e7 18\/4\/2018 tarihinde Anayasa Mahkemesine sunmas\u0131 gerekirken bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 26\/9\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fclkeden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131ktan sonra – tarihi belirli olmamakla birlikte- \u00fclkeye tekrar giri\u015f yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu hususu 24\/3\/2020 tarihli ikinci bir \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n daha bulunmas\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu \u00fclkemizde oldu\u011fu zaman diliminde ya da ba\u015fka bir a\u015famada dosyaya bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresine ili\u015fkin bir mazeret de sunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunlara ek olarak, avukat taraf\u0131ndan da ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f i\u015fleminin 14\/5\/2018 tarihli tebli\u011f i\u015flemiyle \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tespit edilmektedir (\u00a7 10). T\u00fcm bu hususlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruda s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 bulundu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle ba\u015fvurunun, di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
V. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
D. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 23\/10\/2024tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2018\/27830 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 POORYA PARVA BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2018\/27830) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Gizem Ceren DEM\u0130R KO\u015eAR Ba\u015fvurucu : Poorya PARVA Vekili : Av. Ceren \u00c7\u0130LO\u011eLU \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalma riski bulunan \u00fclkeye s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilme karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, Anayasa Mahkemesinin tedbir karar\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilme nedeniyle bireysel ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 26\/9\/2018 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinin idari y\u00f6nden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n incelemesinden sonra Komisyona sunulmu\u015ftur. 4. Birinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Komisyonunca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 5. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 6. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130ran \u0130slam Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131 olup din de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi nedeniyle \u00fclkesinde idam cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lma riski bulundu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. 7. 2017\/39001 numaral\u0131 dosyaya kaydedilen ba\u015fvuruda 13\/12\/2017 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin ge\u00e7ici olarak durdurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda 4\/11\/2020 tarihinde …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n