T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MUSTAFA BA\u015eKIR BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/19315)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 30\/4\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 17\/12\/2024-32755<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa BA\u015eKIR<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Tevhide S\u0131la POLAT<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen fiziksel \u015fiddet ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde Beypazar\u0131 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) S.E. isimli ki\u015finin kaybolmas\u0131 veya ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u015eehit Ertu\u011frul D\u00f6nmez Polis Merkezinde (Polis Merkezi) \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde saat 10.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda bir su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla soru\u015fturma i\u015flemleri i\u00e7in g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Beypazar\u0131 \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde (Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc) fiziksel \u015fiddete u\u011fram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Polis memurlar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun kafas\u0131n\u0131 duvara dayay\u0131p cop ve kemerle kal\u00e7as\u0131na defalarca vurmu\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun baca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir cihaz ile yakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya yumruk atan, g\u00f6zlerine biber gaz\u0131 s\u0131karak hakaret ve tehdit eden memurlar ba\u015fvurucuyu ifade vermeye zorlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, d\u00f6rt saat sonra adli muayenesinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Beypazar\u0131 Devlet Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adli muayenesinin ard\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu, S.E.nin kaybolmas\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Polis Merkezinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifade vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. S.E.ye yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n 24\/8\/2019 tarihinden itibaren ula\u015famamas\u0131 nedeniyle Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda polis memurlar\u0131 S.Y. ve E.G. taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 13\/9\/2019 tarihli tutanakta, S.E.nin 23\/8\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuyla telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn arac\u0131na yak\u0131t ald\u0131ktan sonra S.E.yi arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesine ba\u015fvurulmak \u00fczere i\u015fyerinden al\u0131narak Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne getirildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6zl\u00fc ifadesinde tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ile \u00e7eli\u015fki bulundu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n talimat\u0131 do\u011frultusunda adli muayene raporu al\u0131narak ifade i\u015flemi i\u00e7in Polis Merkezine sevk edildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde saat 14.27’de d\u00fczenlenen adli vaka ibareli raporda sa\u011f ve sol kal\u00e7ada 4×2 cm yayg\u0131n ekimoz oldu\u011fu, kati raporun ortopedi uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 tarihte saat 17.28’de d\u00fczenlenen nezarethane \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f muayenesi ibareli raporda ise sa\u011f ve sol kal\u00e7ada 4×2 cm yayg\u0131n ekimoz oldu\u011fu, kati raporun adli hekim taraf\u0131ndan verilece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, Polis Merkezi Amirli\u011finde 13\/9\/2019 saat 16.50’de \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde S.E.nin nerede oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fini, kal\u00e7as\u0131ndaki k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131n sabah saatlerinde hayvanlarla u\u011fra\u015f\u0131rken yere d\u00fc\u015fmesi sonucu meydana geldi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucunun sal\u0131verilmesi sonras\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
i. 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde saat 20.29’da d\u00fczenlenen adli raporda sa\u011f ve sol kal\u00e7ada 4×2 cm yayg\u0131n ekimoz oldu\u011fu, kati raporun ortopedi uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilece\u011fi,<\/p>\n
ii. Ayn\u0131 tarihte saat 21.58’de d\u00fczenlenen adli raporda kulak kep\u00e7esinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck boyutta ekimoz bulundu\u011fu, her iki gluteal b\u00f6lgenin ekimotik oldu\u011fu, sa\u011f uyluk \u00f6n b\u00f6lgede 1×2 cm ekimotik alan bulundu\u011fu, kati raporun uzman hekim taraf\u0131ndan verilece\u011fi,<\/p>\n
iii. 16\/9\/2019 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen adli raporda her iki kal\u00e7ada 20×20 cm’lik ekimoz oldu\u011fu ve yaralaman\u0131n ki\u015fi \u00fczerindeki etkisinin basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahaleyle giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde ak\u015fam saatlerinde Beypazar\u0131 \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u00fcracaat ederek \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan ifadesinde ba\u015fvurucu, S.E.nin kaybolmas\u0131yla ilgili olarak ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn sabah saatlerinde g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde sorulan sorulara bilmedi\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek cevap vermesi \u00fczerine copla d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bir cihazla baca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, pantolon kemeri ile kal\u00e7as\u0131na vuruldu\u011funu, kula\u011f\u0131na yumruk at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6z\u00fcne biber gaz\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tehditlere ve hakaretlere maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, buradan hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ortopedi b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne sevk edildi\u011fi h\u00e2lde g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; adli muayene sonras\u0131nda bindirildi\u011fi ara\u00e7ta polislerin kendisini kay\u0131p \u015fah\u0131s olay\u0131ndan kurtard\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kimseye anlatmamas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek hayvanlara bakarken d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6ylemesini istediklerini, Polis Merkezine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde kendisini d\u00f6ven polislerin orada oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bir polisin ifadesini almak \u00fczere bilgisayar ba\u015f\u0131nda bulundu\u011funu, m\u00fcdafi huzurunda S.E.nin kaybolmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak verdi\u011fi ifadesinin ard\u0131ndan tekrar hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporu al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sonras\u0131nda da serbest b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kal\u00e7as\u0131ndaki a\u011fr\u0131dan dolay\u0131 oturamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Alo 155’i arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, rapor almas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenmesi \u00fczerine kendi imk\u00e2nlar\u0131 ile muayene oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun 24\/12\/2019 tarihinde Aya\u015f \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde m\u00fc\u015fteki s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131 da bu y\u00f6ndedir. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan beyanlar\u0131nda ek olarak olaydan sonra \u00e7ekilen foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131 ibraz etti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturmada \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revlilerince yap\u0131lan foto\u011fraftan te\u015fhis i\u015flemi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu; kendisine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulayan ki\u015filerin A.\u0130.T., E.G., A.\u00c7. ve K.D. oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ba\u015fvurucunun Polis Merkezinde bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde kaydedilen g\u00fcvenlik kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri \u00fczerinde bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 personeli olan bilirki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan raporda, izlenen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerde fiziksel \u015fiddete ili\u015fkin kay\u0131t bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ve tan\u0131k N.T.nin \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 personeli taraf\u0131ndan ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcpheli memurlar ba\u015fvurucuya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kay\u0131p ki\u015fi ile cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n duyulmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in iftirada bulundu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k N.T. ise Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde hizmetli olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun darp, hakaret ve tehdide maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fi gibi duymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n olay akabinde Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130leti\u015fim Merkezi (C\u0130MER) Do\u011frudan Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Sistemi uygulamas\u0131 vas\u0131tayla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetler ve sunduklar\u0131 foto\u011fraflar soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Foto\u011fraflar\u0131n siyah beyaz olmas\u0131 ve net olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle incelemeye elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcpheli polis memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, s\u00f6z konusu su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair delil elde edilemedi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun S.E.nin kaybolmas\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde kal\u00e7as\u0131ndaki k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131n hayvanlar ile u\u011fra\u015f\u0131rken d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in meydana geldi\u011fine i\u015faret etti\u011fi, adli muayene raporunda g\u00f6zlerinde gaz s\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 herhangi bir hassasiyet oldu\u011funun belirtilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun karara yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz, Ankara Bat\u0131 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi belirtilerek reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 29\/5\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 22\/6\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru formu ekinde Aya\u015f Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde verdi\u011fi ifade s\u0131ras\u0131nda ibraz etti\u011fini belirtti\u011fi foto\u011fraflar\u0131 sunmu\u015ftur. Foto\u011fraflar\u0131n incelenmesi neticesinde her iki kal\u00e7ada yayg\u0131n morluk bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda S.E.nin kaybolmas\u0131 nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada 28\/12\/2020 tarihinde ek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu, bir su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddetine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Usul Boyutunun \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesindeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bir kimsenin devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin 17. maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddiada bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci, gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131; ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli; soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2), B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
22. Somut olayda ba\u015fvuruya konu soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde adli raporlar\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilgili ki\u015filerin tespit edilerek dinlendi\u011fi ve bir k\u0131s\u0131m g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yap\u0131larak bilirki\u015fiye inceletildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine etkili bir \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmesi ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi konusunda soru\u015fturmada eksiklik saptanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek delillerin toplanmas\u0131 konusunda baz\u0131 eksiklikler g\u00f6ze \u00e7arpmaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n
i. Ba\u015fvurucu; Polis Merkezinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde kal\u00e7as\u0131ndaki k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131n sebebini sabah saatlerinde hayvanlar ile u\u011fra\u015f\u0131rken yere d\u00fc\u015fmesi olarak a\u00e7\u0131klasa da Polis Merkezinden sal\u0131verilmesinin ard\u0131ndan Beypazar\u0131 \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda verdi\u011fi ifadesinde -ba\u015fka iddialar yan\u0131nda- copla d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bir cihazla baca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve pantolon kemeri ile kal\u00e7as\u0131na vuruldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Buna ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlardaki tespitlerin ba\u015fvurucunun, kendisine uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi eylemlerin sonucu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 16\/9\/2019 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen adli raporda yer alan her iki kal\u00e7adaki 20×20 cm’lik ekimozun 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlarda ge\u00e7en 4×2 cm’lik yayg\u0131n ekimozla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda adli rapor almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k olay tarihinde saat 21.58’de d\u00fczenlenen adli raporda yer alan kulak kep\u00e7esinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck boyutlu ekimoz ve sa\u011f uyluk \u00f6n b\u00f6lgede 1×2 cm’lik ekimotik alan bulundu\u011fuyla ilgili tespit hakk\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iii. Ba\u015fvurucu, k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmesine ra\u011fmen bilirki\u015fiye Polis Merkezindeki kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 inceletilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesi Polis Merkezinde al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne hangi i\u015flem i\u00e7in g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve burada ne kadar s\u00fcreyle tutuldu\u011fu hususunda bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iv. Ba\u015fvurucunun olaydan sonra arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi Alo 155’in kay\u0131tlar\u0131 istenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Maddi Boyutunun \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda devletin g\u00f6zetim ve denetimi alt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda al\u0131nan iki adli rapor ile ba\u015fvurucunun sal\u0131verilmesinin ard\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilk adli rapor birbiriyle uyumludur ve sadece ba\u015fvurucunun sa\u011f ve sol kal\u00e7as\u0131nda 4×2 cm yayg\u0131n ekimoz bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvurucu; copla d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, bir cihazla baca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve pantolon kemeri ile kal\u00e7as\u0131na vuruldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin iddialarda bulunsa da m\u00fcdafi refakatinde \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadesinde yaralanman\u0131n sebebini sabah saatlerinde hayvanlar ile u\u011fra\u015f\u0131rken yere d\u00fc\u015fmesi olarak a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda olay g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 21.58’de d\u00fczenlenen adli raporda yer alan kulak kep\u00e7esinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck boyutlu ekimoz ve sa\u011f uyluk \u00f6n b\u00f6lgede 1×2 cm’lik ekimotik alan bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin tespitler ba\u015fvurucunun sal\u0131verilmesinin ard\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilk adli raporda yer almamaktad\u0131r. Bu \u00e7eli\u015fkili delil unsurlar\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu konusunda bu a\u015famada inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN ve Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile yeniden soru\u015fturma talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi soru\u015fturma mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin benzer y\u00f6ndeki kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
2. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE YER OLMADI\u011eINA Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN ve Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ’in kar\u015f\u0131oylar\u0131 ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Beypazar\u0131 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2019\/2023) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 446,90 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.246,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 30\/4\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. \u0130\u015fkence, eziyet ve insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan muamele yasa\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 devletin negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yasa\u011fa mutlak riayet iken pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri ise koruma ve etkili soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndedir. Etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131na girmektedir. Mahkememiz \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeye ve karara kat\u0131lmaktay\u0131m. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise usul boyutunun ihlaline karar verildi\u011fi i\u00e7in bu a\u015famada iddian\u0131n incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bi\u00e7imindeki \u00e7o\u011funluk karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
2. Devletin hakk\u0131 ihlal etmeme ve koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri hakk\u0131n maddi boyutuyla ilgilidir. Koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131na hakk\u0131n ihlal edilmesini \u00f6nleyici idari ve yarg\u0131sal d\u00fczeni olu\u015fturmak, gereken tedbirleri almak gibi hususlar girmektedir. Yine koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131na yasa\u011f\u0131n ihlali halinde etkili soru\u015fturma yap\u0131l\u0131p sorumlunun tespiti halinde hakk\u0131 koruyucu nitelikte cezaland\u0131rmay\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek adli sistemin te\u015fkil edilmesi de girmektedir. \u00d6te yandan te\u015fkil edilen adli hukuk d\u00fczeninin somut olayda soru\u015fturma ve cezaland\u0131rma (etkin soru\u015fturma) boyutuyla hakk\u0131 koruma yetene\u011fini yitirdi\u011fi durumda da hakk\u0131n maddi boyutuyla ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekebilir. Eylemin devletin koruma ve g\u00f6zetimi alt\u0131nda meydana geldi\u011fi \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde ise negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yerine getirilmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131 s\u00f6z konusudur. Bu iddialarda kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fduriyete neden olan vakaya ili\u015fkin makul bir gerek\u00e7eyi ortaya koyamamalar\u0131 halinde k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalmama hakk\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutuyla ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fmak gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130ncelenen olayda ba\u015fvuran\u0131n ifadesi 13.9.2019 tarihinde saat 10.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla il\u00e7e emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde al\u0131nmak istenmi\u015ftir. Bu noktada ifade \u00f6ncesi mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucunun adli raporunun al\u0131nmamas\u0131 dikkat \u00e7ekicidir. \u0130fade sonras\u0131nda devlet hastanesinden saat 14.27\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen adli raporda sa\u011f ve sol kal\u00e7ada 4×2 cm yayg\u0131n ekimoz oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f olup, \u00fc\u00e7 saat sonra 17.28\u2019de nezarethane \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f muayenesi ibaresiyle d\u00fczenlenen ikinci rapor da ayn\u0131 bulgular\u0131 i\u00e7ermektedir. Ba\u015fvuran sal\u0131verildikten hemen sonra Jandarma komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na gidip \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmu\u015f ve bu nedenle ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 21.58\u2019de al\u0131nan raporda, \u00f6nceki rapor bulgular\u0131na ek olarak kulak kep\u00e7esinde ve sa\u011f uyluk \u00f6n b\u00f6lgede de k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck boyutta ekimozlar bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuran taraf\u0131ndan devlet hastanesinden al\u0131nan 16.9.2019 tarihli raporda ise her iki kal\u00e7adaki yayg\u0131n ekimozun 20×20 cm boyutlar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuran \u015fikayeti s\u0131ras\u0131nda, polislerin kendisine hayvanlara bakarken d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6ylemesini, b\u00f6ylece kendisine y\u00f6neltilen su\u00e7lamadan onu kurtaracaklar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek bask\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u00e7in daha \u00f6nce o y\u00f6nde beyanda bulundu\u011funu, ancak ger\u00e7e\u011fin b\u00f6yle olmay\u0131p \u00f6n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme (ifade) i\u00e7in g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc emniyet merkezinde itiraf elde etmek amac\u0131yla copla ve kemerle d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, baca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir cihazla yak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kula\u011f\u0131na yumruk at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zlerine biber gaz\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tehdit ve hakaretlere maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve kendisine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00f6rt polis memurunu foto\u011fraflar\u0131ndan te\u015fhis etmi\u015ftir. Rapor bulgular\u0131 ve sal\u0131verildikten hemen sonra yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fikayet s\u00fcreci dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ciddi ve savunulabilir oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturma sonunda, kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda bir bulgunun olmamas\u0131 ve kendi beyan\u0131nda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn hayvanlarla u\u011fra\u015f\u0131rken d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in kal\u00e7a b\u00f6lgesinde ekimoz olu\u015ftu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi, yine raporlarda g\u00f6zlerine gaz s\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir bulgu bulunmamas\u0131 nedenleriyle yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuran\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz ise merci taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Bununla birlikte Savc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131nda adli raporlarda tespit edilen bulgular\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fme ile mi yoksa \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 sonucu mu meydana gelmi\u015f olabilece\u011fine dair t\u0131bbi bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yoluna gidilmemi\u015ftir. Kolluktaki kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 bizzat ve gerekti\u011fi gibi incelenmemi\u015f, \u015f\u00fcpheli olarak ifadesinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosya incelenip ba\u015fvuranla ilgili olarak sonras\u0131nda hukuki bir sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131l\u0131p \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n olmayan bir \u015fiddet iddias\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir nedenin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuran\u0131n olaydan sonra arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti\u011fi 155 numaral\u0131 telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131 getirtilmemi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Ba\u015fvuran\u0131n, ifadesinin karakolda de\u011fil polis merkezinde al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve burada kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu eylemlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini iddias\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmedi\u011fi incelenmemi\u015f, bu konuda tan\u0131k ve kamera bulgular\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc kullan\u0131larak meydana geldi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen \u00f6l\u00fcmlerde veya \u015f\u00fcpheli \u00f6l\u00fcm olgusuna kar\u015f\u0131 devletin maddi olay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama ve \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc gerek\u00e7elendirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc oldu\u011fu gibi k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddialar\u0131nda da benzer bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00f6z konusudur. Nitekim bu t\u00fcr durumda etkin soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, devletin koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcyle ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hakk\u0131n maddi boyutuyla da ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi etkin bir soru\u015fturmayla ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, devletin gerek\u00e7elendirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yerine getirilmemesi hakk\u0131n maddi boyutuyla da ihlal edilmesine yol a\u00e7abilecektir (Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131nda gerek\u00e7elendirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn yerine getirilmemesinin hakk\u0131n maddi boyutuyla da ihlaline yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bkz. A\u0130HM Cang\u00f6z ve di\u011f. T\u00fcrkiye, par. 115, 138-139; Tayda\u015f v. T\u00fcrkiye, par. 44-45; G\u00fclfidan, O. Serkan, Ya\u015fam Hakk\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Devletin Pozitif Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri, Ankara 2021, s. 641).<\/p>\n
8. \u0130ncelenen olayda ba\u015fvuran\u0131n olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ak\u015fam saatlerinde serbest kald\u0131ktan hemen sonra \u015fikayet\u00e7i olarak rapor al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 ve soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, serbest kalmadan \u00f6nce kolluk g\u00f6zetiminde iken d\u00fc\u015ferek yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ifadesini bask\u0131 alt\u0131nda verdi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ciddi ve savunulabilir olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yukar\u0131da s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen bi\u00e7imde devletin bu iddian\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatmas\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7elendirmesi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturmama karar\u0131ndaki yukar\u0131da belirtilen \u00f6nemli eksikliklerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise s\u00f6z konusu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yerine getirilemedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu yan\u0131nda maddi boyutuyla da ihlal edildi\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddeti ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvuruda Mahkeme \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine dair iddian\u0131n incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
2. Karardaki olay ve olgular k\u0131sm\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru ile ilgili yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda da g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucunun Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n talimat\u0131 ile ifade i\u015flemi al\u0131nmak \u00fczere Polis Merkezine sevk edilmesi sonras\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7te ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda hastanede d\u00fczenlenen be\u015f ayr\u0131 adli muayene raporu mevcuttur. Bu raporlar\u0131n ikisi polis e\u015fli\u011finde devlet hastanesinden, \u00fc\u00e7 rapor ise ba\u015fvurucunun kendisi taraf\u0131ndan hastanelerden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Somut ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi \u015feklindeki \u00e7o\u011funluk karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
4. Ancak burada ba\u015fvurucunun ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve raporlarda da yer alan kal\u00e7adaki (gluteal b\u00f6lge) ekimozlar, kulak kep\u00e7esindeki ekimoz ve sa\u011f uyluk b\u00f6lgedeki ekimoz ile ilgili olarak Savc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131ndaki a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda baz\u0131 sorunlar mevcuttur.<\/p>\n
5. Gluteal b\u00f6lgedeki k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131klar\u0131n nas\u0131l meydana geldi\u011fi ba\u011flam\u0131nda Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan maddi olay\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda t\u0131bbi bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki al\u0131nan raporlar i\u00e7erisinde ba\u015fvurucunun savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talimat\u0131yla ifade almaya giri\u015f a\u015famas\u0131nda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelen bir \u201cgiri\u015f raporu\u201d da g\u00f6r\u00fclememektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te Savc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u015fvurucunun gluteal b\u00f6lgedeki yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l meydana geldi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yerine getirilebilmi\u015f de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
6. Ek olarak yine savc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131nda kulaktaki zedelenme ve sa\u011f uyluk b\u00f6lgesindeki yaralanman\u0131n ne \u015fekilde meydana geldi\u011fi ile ilgili de bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve a\u00e7\u0131klama bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Oysa Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda somut olaya ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan savc\u0131l\u0131k incelemesinde bu hususlarla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulundu\u011fu a\u015fikard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Yukar\u0131da s\u0131ralanan gerek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 zamanda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun da ihlal edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki \u00e7o\u011funluk karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamaktay\u0131m.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 30\/4\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/19315 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MUSTAFA BA\u015eKIR BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/19315) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 30\/4\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 17\/12\/2024-32755 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u015fe Didem \u00d6ZDEM\u0130R AKCA Ba\u015fvurucu : Mustafa BA\u015eKIR Vekili : Av. Tevhide S\u0131la POLAT \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen fiziksel \u015fiddet ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde Beypazar\u0131 Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) S.E. isimli ki\u015finin kaybolmas\u0131 veya ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u015eehit Ertu\u011frul D\u00f6nmez Polis Merkezinde (Polis Merkezi) \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. \u0130ddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, 13\/9\/2019 tarihinde saat 10.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda bir su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla soru\u015fturma i\u015flemleri i\u00e7in g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Beypazar\u0131 \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde (Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc) fiziksel \u015fiddete u\u011fram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Polis memurlar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun kafas\u0131n\u0131 duvara dayay\u0131p cop ve kemerle kal\u00e7as\u0131na defalarca vurmu\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun baca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir cihaz ile yakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya yumruk atan, g\u00f6zlerine biber gaz\u0131 s\u0131karak hakaret ve tehdit eden memurlar ba\u015fvurucuyu ifade vermeye zorlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, d\u00f6rt saat sonra adli …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n