T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
DEL\u0130L TEK\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/20630)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan SARA\u00c7<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Delil TEK\u0130N<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130zmir 4 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lmaktayken 8\/12\/2020 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerin 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un44. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (l) bendinde yer alan “su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin e\u011fitim ve propaganda faaliyetlerini yapmak veya yapt\u0131rmak” h\u00fckm\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 sonucu \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulunun18\/12\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla 20 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye konulma disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun beyan\u0131n\u0131 duru\u015fmada ald\u0131ktan sonra 14\/1\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun eylemini 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 44. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u0131) bendinde yer alan “firar etmek” olarak nitelendirmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“..Hakimli\u011fimizce yap\u0131lan incelemede; h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna sevk edildi\u011fi esnada firar etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 boyunca 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 yasada d\u00fczenlenen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere uymak zorunda oldu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131larak 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 44\/3 (\u0131) maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen firar disiplin su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finin sabit oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilerek a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
4. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi verilen kararda maddi hata yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 18\/1\/2021tarihli ek karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun 22\/12\/2020 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunu dosya \u00fczerinden yeniden incelemi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun eylemini 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 44. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (l) bendinde yer alan “su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin e\u011fitim ve propaganda faaliyetlerini yapmak veya yapt\u0131rmak” \u015feklinde nitelendirerek incelemesini yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“…Bu ba\u011flamda h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn itiraz dilek\u00e7esi i\u00e7eri\u011fi, huzurdaki savunmas\u0131, 10\/12\/2020 tarihli tuanak ve t\u00fcm dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fi birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; Ceza verme karar\u0131nda bulunan defter i\u00e7eri\u011finin Su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin e\u011fitim ve propaganda faaliyetlerini yapmak veya yapt\u0131rmak su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, ceza verme karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan itiraz\u0131n reddine, disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
5. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin ek karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya 20\/1\/2021 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu 21-22\/1\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7eleriyle \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 18\/1\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) itirazda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 4\/2\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi incelemesini \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 14\/1\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 \u00fczerinden yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 18\/1\/2021 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla ilgili olarak herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 4\/2\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131nda \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 18\/1\/2021 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla ilgili olarak herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunulmamas\u0131, \u0130nfaz Kurumu disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015ftirilmesinde teredd\u00fct has\u0131l olmas\u0131 nedenleriyle teredd\u00fct\u00fcn giderilmesi i\u00e7in A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu yaz\u0131ya ili\u015fkin olarak 4\/3\/2021 tarihli ve 2021\/401 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fczekkere ile “Disiplin kurulu karar\u0131 ve infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011finin ek karar\u0131nda 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 44 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (l) bendi uygulanarak disiplin cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi, mahkememizin itiraz de\u011ferlendirme karar\u0131nda ise infaz h\u00e2kimli\u011finin ilk karar\u0131 esas al\u0131narak maddi hata nedeniyle firar su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve mahkememizce disiplin cezas\u0131 sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 44 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (l) bendi esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.” \u015feklinde bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin s\u00f6z konusu yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesi \u00fczerine, \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kesinle\u015fen disiplin cezas\u0131 5-25\/3\/2021 tarihleri aras\u0131nda infaz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu, cezan\u0131n infaz edildi\u011fi a\u015famada 8\/3\/2021 tarihinde kesinle\u015fen karar\u0131 tebell\u00fc\u011f ettikten sonra 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. Gerek\u00e7eli Karar Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fik\u00e2yetine ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015fka bir gerek\u00e7e ile \u015fik\u00e2yetin incelenmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, konuya ili\u015fkin olarak Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na yer verildikten sonra yap\u0131lacak incelemede bu i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 meselenin sadece maddi hata ile a\u00e7\u0131klanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015flenmeyen hatta i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia edilmeyen bir fiilden dolay\u0131 ilgisiz ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7e ile \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin asl\u0131n\u0131n incelenmedi\u011fini, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin sadece karar\u0131 de\u011fil yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 da firar etme eyleminden yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, karar\u0131n \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fince d\u00fczeltilme a\u015famas\u0131nda savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yanl\u0131\u015f eylemden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc hatal\u0131 muhakeme ile yanl\u0131\u015f karar verildi\u011fini, A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin de yanl\u0131\u015f eylemlere ili\u015fkin yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirmelere kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zensiz inceleme yapmak suretiyle karar\u0131nda ceza verilmesine ili\u015fkin olarak defter i\u00e7eri\u011fine at\u0131f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ceza verme karar\u0131nda ise telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde ge\u00e7en ifadeler nedeniyle ceza verildi\u011fini, \u00f6zetle bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak maddi hatadan ziyade yarg\u0131lama konusuna ili\u015fkin haz\u0131rlanan dosyada \u00f6zenli davran\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, y\u00fczseysel bir inceleme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvuru gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir. <\/p>\n
15. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencesini de kapsamaktad\u0131r (daha geni\u015f de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Abdullah Top\u00e7u, B. No: 2014\/8868, 19\/4\/2017, \u00a7 75). Nitekim Anayasa’n\u0131n 141. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cB\u00fct\u00fcn mahkemelerin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d denilerek mahkemelere kararlar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli yazma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00fcklenmi\u015ftir. Mahkemelerin an\u0131lan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, yarg\u0131lamada ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen her t\u00fcrl\u00fc iddia ve savunmaya karar gerek\u00e7esinde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 cevap vermesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde anla\u015f\u0131lamaz. Ancak mahkemeler, kendilerine sunulan t\u00fcm iddialara cevap vermek zorunda de\u011filse de (Yasemin Ek\u015fi, B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 56) mahkemelerin davan\u0131n esas sorunlar\u0131n\u0131 inceledikleri gerek\u00e7eli karardan anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bir kararda tam olarak hangi unsurlar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi davan\u0131n niteli\u011fine ve \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Muhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut bir bi\u00e7imde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davayla do\u011frudan ilgili olan bu hususlara mahkemelerce makul bir gerek\u00e7e ile cevap verilmesi gerekir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7 35). Aksi bir tutumla mahkemenin davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili oldu\u011funu kabul etti\u011fi bir husus hakk\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir cevap vermemesi veya cevap vermeyi gerektiren usul veya esasa dair iddialar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z b\u0131rakmas\u0131 hak ihlaline neden olabilecektir (Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 39).<\/p>\n
16. Somut olayda, ba\u015fvurucunun haftal\u0131k olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadeler nedeniyle \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin e\u011fitim ve propaganda faaliyetlerini yapmak veya yapt\u0131rmak disiplin su\u00e7u nedeniyle disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131larak ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131n da buna ili\u015fkin olarak al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve cezan\u0131n da bu eyleme dayal\u0131 olarak verildi\u011fi hususunda herhangi bir \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda ise bu Mahkeme, \u015fik\u00e2yet konusu eylemden tamamen farkl\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde, disipline konu eylemle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir gerek\u00e7e ile h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis etmi\u015ftir. 14\/1\/2024 tarihli karardaki bu yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n fark\u0131na var\u0131larak itiraz \u00fczerine dosya yeniden de\u011ferlendirmeye al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 18\/1\/2021 tarihli ek kararda ba\u015fvurucunun eylemine ili\u015fkin olarak \u00f6nce de\u011ferlendirme k\u0131sm\u0131nda telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi i\u00e7eri\u011fine yer verilmi\u015f ise de de\u011ferlendirmenin son k\u0131sm\u0131nda ”ceza verme karar\u0131nda bulunan defter i\u00e7eri\u011finin su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin e\u011fitim ve propaganda faaliyetlerini yapmak veya yapt\u0131rmak su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, ceza verme karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131” \u015feklinde ifadelere yer verilmi\u015f ve \u0130nfaz Kurumunca tesis edilen disiplin cezas\u0131 onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz \u00fczerine ise A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi de \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 14\/1\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fundan itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011finin ek karar\u0131na itiraz\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak ise herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130nfaz Kurumunun teredd\u00fct olu\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131\u015fma \u00fczerine ise A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin bir yaz\u0131\u015fma ile ba\u015fvurucuya verilen disiplin cezas\u0131n\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece yarg\u0131sal mercilerin bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ilk an\u0131ndan itibaren ba\u015fvurucun iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin esasl\u0131 bir incelemeyi \u00f6zenli \u015fekilde yapmay\u0131p ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e ortaya koyamad\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Di\u011fer taraftan bu ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n esas\u0131yla ilgili herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi vurgulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Zira gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, taraflara yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kurallara uygun bi\u00e7imde incelenip incelenmedi\u011fini bilmelerine imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayan bir hak olup yarg\u0131lama sonucuna y\u00f6nelik bir teminat sa\u011flamaz. Bu itibarla Anayasa Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtti\u011fi ihlal gerek\u00e7elerini g\u00f6zeterek ve s\u00f6z konusu iddiayla ilgili olarak yeniden bir de\u011ferlendirme yaparak gereken karar\u0131 vermek yine yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin takdirindedir.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu; ailesi ile haftada iki kez yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde kullan\u0131lan ifadelerin propaganda olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesinin imk\u00e2ns\u0131z oldu\u011funu, telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerinde ge\u00e7en ifadelerin yanl\u0131\u015f terc\u00fcme edildi\u011fini, iki ki\u015fi aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en ve \u015fiddet i\u00e7ermeyen ifadelerin haks\u0131z bir \u015fekilde \u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 yapmak olarak nitelendirildi\u011fini b\u00f6ylece ifade h\u00fcrriyetinin de ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verildi\u011finden ifade h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik iddia hakk\u0131nda bu a\u015famada ayr\u0131ca kabul edilebilirlik ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu ihlalin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile miktar belirtmeksizin maddi ve manevi tazminat\u0131n \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvuruda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen bireysel ba\u015fvuruya \u00f6zg\u00fc yeniden yarg\u0131lama kurumunun \u00f6zelliklerine ili\u015fkin kapsaml\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
23. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (E. 2020\/4273, K. 2021\/328) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 23\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 23\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/20630 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 DEL\u0130L TEK\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/20630) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 23\/10\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Hasan SARA\u00c7 Ba\u015fvurucu : Delil TEK\u0130N \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130zmir 4 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lmaktayken 8\/12\/2020 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerin 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un44. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (l) bendinde yer alan “su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin e\u011fitim ve propaganda faaliyetlerini yapmak veya yapt\u0131rmak” h\u00fckm\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 sonucu \u0130nfaz Kurumu Disiplin Kurulunun18\/12\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla 20 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye konulma disiplin cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan disiplin cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131yaka \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) \u015fik\u00e2yet ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun beyan\u0131n\u0131 duru\u015fmada ald\u0131ktan sonra 14\/1\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun eylemini 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 44. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u0131) bendinde yer alan “firar etmek” olarak nitelendirmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n