T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
BAYRAM YABA VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/26341)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Murat \u0130lter DEVEC\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Bayram YABA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Kadriye YABA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. C\u00fcneyt YABA<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
4. Erkan YABA<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. P\u0131nar YAL\u00c7IN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na izin verilmeyen h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6lmesi ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular Bayram Yaba ve Kadriye Yaba\u2019n\u0131n o\u011flu, di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ise karde\u015fi olan 1997 do\u011fumlu \u00d6.Y., hakk\u0131nda verilen ve kesinle\u015fen h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n infaz\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda bir s\u00fcre Adana E Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda tutulmu\u015ftur. Tutulma s\u00fcrecinde \u00d6.Y. hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen baz\u0131 belgelerde \u00d6.Y.nin epilepsi (sara) hastas\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. \u00d6.Y. 8\/2\/2018 tarihinde Adana A\u00e7\u0131k Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) nakledilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ak\u015fam saatlerinde Ceza Kurumuna giren \u00d6.Y. g\u00f6revlilere epilepsi hastas\u0131 oldu\u011fu s\u00f6yleyip yan\u0131nda getirdi\u011fi iki ilac\u0131 kullanmak zorunda oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. G\u00f6revliler re\u00e7etesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ve \u00d6.Y.ye ertesi g\u00fcn revirden teslim alabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen ila\u00e7lar\u0131 al\u0131koymu\u015ftur. \u00d6.Y. \u0130nfaz Kurumundaki ba\u015fmemurluk odas\u0131na birka\u00e7 kez giderek Ba\u015fmemur K.Y.den ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmak i\u00e7in izin istemi\u015f ancak K.Y. buna izin vermemi\u015ftir. \u00d6.Y. ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 alabilmek i\u00e7in ertesi g\u00fcn (9\/2\/2018) revire ba\u015fvurmu\u015f ancak sa\u011fl\u0131k memuru \u015e.O., \u00d6.Y.ye ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 vermedi\u011fi gibi \u0130nfaz Kurumunda doktor olarak g\u00f6rev yapan fakat g\u00f6revine gelmeyen E.B.ye de \u00d6.Y.nin durumunu bildirmemi\u015f, do\u011fum veya s\u00fct iznini kullanmak i\u00e7in saat 14.00\u2019te \u0130nfaz Kurumundan ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. \u00d6.Y. 10\/2\/2018 tarihinde ko\u011fu\u015funda \u00f6l\u00fc olarak bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u00d6.Y.nin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 1. Adli T\u0131p \u0130htisas Kurulundan (\u0130htisas Kurulu) al\u0131nan 11\/4\/2018 tarihli raporda; \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn epilepsi hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 geli\u015fen komplikasyonlar sonucu meydana geldi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi ve \u00d6.Y.nin, epilepsi hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tedavisinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ilac\u0131 kullanmamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olabilece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f ancak ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli kullanan epilepsi hastalar\u0131nda da ani beklenmedik \u00f6l\u00fcmler (SUDEP) g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn t\u0131bben bilindi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 19\/4\/2018 tarihli iddianameyle K.Y. ve \u015e.O.ya kar\u015f\u0131 ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ddianamede Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza ve Tevkifevleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn 20\/11\/2015 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile tutuklanarak veya nakil yoluyla kurumlara gelen h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n kuruma kabullerinde s\u00fcrekli ila\u00e7 kullanmak zorunda olanlar\u0131n yanlar\u0131nda getirdikleri ila\u00e7lar\u0131n vakit ge\u00e7irilmeksizin kendilerine teslim edilmesi amac\u0131yla ila\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131na dair bir rapor veya re\u00e7ete bulunmamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde mevcut raporlar getirilinceye ya da yeniden ila\u00e7 kullan\u0131m raporu veya re\u00e7ete d\u00fczenleninceye kadar ila\u00e7lar\u0131n listesinin \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ve en fazla iki\u015fer g\u00fcnl\u00fck dozlarla mahpuslara verilmesinin g\u00f6revlilere bildirildi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin s\u00f6z konusu bildirime ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket ederek ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne sebebiyet verdikleri iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Kovu\u015fturma Adana 14. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (Ceza Mahkemesi) taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dinlenen tan\u0131klardan H.B.; \u00d6.Y.nin, epilepsi hastas\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 almazsa \u00f6lebilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen K.Y.nin \u00d6.Y.ye ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 vermedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ceza Mahkemesi 21\/2\/2019 tarihinde yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 sonland\u0131rarak san\u0131klar\u0131n beraatine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ceza Mahkemesi verdi\u011fi kararda \u00d6.Y.nin \u0130nfaz Kurumuna re\u00e7ete sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve san\u0131klar\u0131n Y.B. hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f raporlara Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Projesi (UYAP) kayd\u0131 \u00fczerinden ula\u015fma yetkilerinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edip \u0130htisas Kurulunun haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 rapor dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00d6.Y. ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kullanm\u0131\u015f olsayd\u0131 bile \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn meydana gelmesinin ihtimal d\u00e2hilinde oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu inceleyen Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Ceza Dairesi (Ceza Dairesi), \u0130htisas Kurulunun haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 raporu esas alarak \u00d6.Y.nin hayat\u0131n\u0131n sona erme tehlikesi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen san\u0131klar\u0131n hayat\u0131n korunmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken icrai davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmedi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle san\u0131klara isnat edilen ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 itibar\u0131yla olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte Ceza Dairesi, ihmali davran\u0131\u015flar neticesinde \u00d6.Y.nin sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli olan ila\u00e7lar\u0131 kullanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131klar\u0131n ihmal suretiyle g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle san\u0131klar\u0131n an\u0131lan su\u00e7 nedeniyle neticeten 5 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na ancak h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bu karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131, Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 5. Ceza Dairesince 16\/4\/2021 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvuru; s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde, 31\/5\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyon ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular; yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcnde \u00fc\u00e7 doz kullanmak zorunda oldu\u011fu ila\u00e7lar\u0131 \u0130nfaz Kurumuna konulduktan sonra, \u00fcstelik yetkililerden \u0131srarla talep etmesine ra\u011fmen iki g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle kullanamamas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle hayat\u0131 tehlike alt\u0131nda olan yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131n korunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular ayr\u0131ca olay nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131lamada eksik inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makulbir s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131ndan yak\u0131narak ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve baz\u0131 anayasal g\u00fcvencelerin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede Anayasa Mahkemesinin ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesinin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ile ilgili mevzuat\u0131n somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn ekinde yer alan ve Ceza Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan 25\/11\/2022 tarihli belgenin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201c…<\/p>\n
– H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ila\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin rapor ve bilgilerin UYAP sisteminde g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcp g\u00f6r\u00fcnmedi\u011fi hususunda;<\/p>\n
kurumumuza ilk gelen h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclere ait ila\u00e7 varsa mahkum kabul taraf\u0131ndan teslim evra\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenerek kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131r. Doktor g\u00f6rene kadar h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc nas\u0131l kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan eder ise o \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye kulland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. \u0130la\u00e7 kullan\u0131m re\u00e7etesi ya da raporu Uyap sistemine taran\u0131r ise g\u00f6r\u00fcnmekte, uyap sistemine taranmaz ise ila\u00e7 kullan\u0131m raporu ya da re\u00e7etesi g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemektedir.<\/p>\n
– Nakil ve sevk olarak ba\u015fka kuruma g\u00f6nderilen h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ilac\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l temin edildi\u011fi hususunda;<\/p>\n
Nakil g\u00f6nderilen h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn t\u00fcm ila\u00e7lar\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye teslim tesell\u00fcm evrak\u0131 d\u00fczenlenip, say\u0131l\u0131 olarak ila\u00e7lar teslim edilir. Nakil gelen h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn ise yine ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde prosed\u00fcrler uygulanarak nakil \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 yapan ceza infaz kurumu t\u00fcm ila\u00e7lar\u0131 say\u0131l\u0131 olarak teslim evra\u011f\u0131yla teslim eder, geldi\u011fi ceza infaz kurumu da kabul\u00fcn\u00fc sa\u011flar ya da doktora muayene ettirilerek re\u00e7ete ile eczaneden al\u0131narak h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcye imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ila\u00e7lar teslim edilir.<\/p>\n
…\u201d<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvuruda kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin \u00d6.Y.nin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olduklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde makul \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6tesinde kan\u0131t bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin maddi boyutunun bu a\u015famada incelenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yap\u0131lacak inceleme ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin usul boyutuna hasredilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda devlet, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in olu\u015fturulan yasal ve idari \u00e7er\u00e7evenin gere\u011fi gibi uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hakka y\u00f6nelik ihlallerin durdurulup cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak etkili bir yarg\u0131sal sistem kurmakla da y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheli her \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2012\/752, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a752, 54; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 97).<\/p>\n
14. Kasten ya da sald\u0131r\u0131 veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele sonucu meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcmlerdedevletin sorumlular\u0131n tespitine ve cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na imk\u00e2n verebilecek nitelikte cezai soru\u015fturmalar y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulunsa da kas\u0131tl\u0131 olmayan eylemler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsenebilir ve ma\u011fdurlara hukuki, idari hatta disiplinle ilgili hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yerine getirilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli olabilir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 59; Nafia Sevin Erg\u00fcn Sefada ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/14844, 1\/12\/2016, \u00a7 63). Bununla beraber \u00f6l\u00fcm kas\u0131tl\u0131 olmayan bir eylemin sonucu olsabile olayda kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n muhakeme hatas\u0131n\u0131 veya dikkatsizli\u011fi a\u015fan bir kusuru varsa,yani olas\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n fark\u0131nda olmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen yetkili makamlar kendilerine verilen yetkiler kapsam\u0131nda ya\u015fam i\u00e7in var olan riskleri bertaraf etmek i\u00e7in gerekli ve yeterli \u00f6nlemleri almamam\u0131\u015flarsa bireylerin hayat\u0131n\u0131n tehlikeye girmesine neden olan ki\u015filer aleyhine hi\u00e7bir su\u00e7lamada bulunulmamas\u0131 ya da bu ki\u015filerin yarg\u0131lanmamas\u0131 ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline neden olabilir [Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 60. Etkili yarg\u0131sal sistem kurma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi durumlarla ilgili \u00f6rnek kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. Bedrettin Yal\u00e7in ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/16380, 9\/1\/2018; Dilek Gen\u00e7 ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/3944, 1\/2\/2018; Naziker Onba\u015f\u0131 ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/18224, 9\/5\/2018; Burcu Demirkaya ve Y\u00fccel Demirkaya, B. No: 2015\/1232, 30\/10\/2018; Abd\u00fclkadir Y\u0131lmaz ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/13649, 29\/1\/2020; Serap Sivri, B. No: 2019\/6198, 23\/11\/2021. Bir uyu\u015fturucu madde ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu s\u0131rada opioid kullan\u0131ma ba\u011fl\u0131 akut zehirlenme ve yoksunluk durumu meydana gelmesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 yitirdi\u011fi ve olay\u0131n ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirdi\u011fi ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin olarak bkz. Nuran Seslio\u011flu, B. No: 2014\/13765, 9\/1\/2018].<\/p>\n
15. Somut olayda \u00d6.Y. \u0130nfaz Kurumuna al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin denetimi alt\u0131na girmi\u015f ve \u00d6.Y.nin,epilepsi hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in mutlaka kullanmas\u0131 gereken ila\u00e7lar\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na m\u00fcsaade edilmemi\u015ftir. \u0130htisas Kurulunca haz\u0131rlanan raporda da \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn epilepsihastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 geli\u015fen komplikasyonlar sonucu meydana geldi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi ve \u00d6.Y.nin, epilepsi hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tedavisinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ilac\u0131kullanmamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olabilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle etkili yarg\u0131sal sistem kurma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn somut olayda ancak etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesiyle yerine getirilebilece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesine ili\u015fkin kabul edilebilirlik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir sorun g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.Ayr\u0131ca ihlal iddias\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir kabul edilemezlik nedeni de tespit edilmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Etkili yarg\u0131sal sistem kurma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n resen harekete ge\u00e7erek \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri tespit etmesi, soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, soru\u015fturman\u0131n veya sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 ve me\u015fru menfaatlerini korumak i\u00e7in \u00f6len ki\u015finin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine gerekli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kat\u0131labilmesi gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma sonucunda al\u0131nan karar; soru\u015fturmada elde edilen t\u00fcm bulgular\u0131n kapsaml\u0131, nesnel ve tarafs\u0131z bir analizine dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 57, 58; Cemil Dan\u0131\u015fman, B. No: 2013\/6319, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 98-100; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 99).Olas\u0131 cezai sorumlulu\u011fun tespiti ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonras\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f ise bu a\u015faman\u0131n da Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gereklerine cevap verebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131 gerekir (Filiz Aka, B. No: 2013\/8365, 10\/6\/2015, \u00a7 30; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 100).<\/p>\n
17. S\u00f6z\u00fc edilen soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 koruyan mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve vuku bulan \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131nda sorumlular ile sorumluluklar\u0131 tespit etmektir (Cemil Dan\u0131\u015fman, \u00a7 97; Narin Kurt [GK], B. No: 2018\/2540, 1\/12\/2022, \u00a7 91).<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda Ceza Dairesi; san\u0131klar\u0131n ihmali davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 neticesinde \u00d6.Y.nin, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli olan ila\u00e7lar\u0131 kullanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015f ancak \u0130htisas Kurulunun raporunu dikkate alarak \u00f6l\u00fcmle ihmali davran\u0131\u015flar aras\u0131nda illiyet ba\u011f\u0131 kurmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 8). Ne var ki \u0130htisas Kurulunca haz\u0131rlanan raporun \u00f6l\u00fcmden do\u011fan sorumlulu\u011fun tespiti konusunda sonuca varmak i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bahsi ge\u00e7en raporda \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn epilepsi hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 geli\u015fen komplikasyonlar sonucu meydana geldi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi ve \u00d6.Y.nin, epilepsi hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tedavisinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ilac\u0131kullanmamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olabilece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f fakat ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli kullanan epilepsi hastalar\u0131nda da ani beklenmedik \u00f6l\u00fcmler (SUDEP) g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn t\u0131bben bilindi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte raporda \u00d6.Y.nin -\u0130nfaz Kurumunda ge\u00e7irilen s\u00fcre de d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere- tutuldu\u011fu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli olarak kullanan bir ki\u015fi olarak kabul edilip edilemeyece\u011fi, mutlaka kullanmas\u0131 gereken ilac\u0131 kullanamamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6.Y.nin sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerindeki etkisinin ne oldu\u011fu, \u00d6.Y.nin bu ilac\u0131 kullanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan \u00f6l\u00fcm oran\u0131 ile s\u00f6z konusu ilac\u0131 d\u00fczenli kullanan veya kullanmayan epilepsi hastalar\u0131ndaki ani \u00f6l\u00fcm oran\u0131n\u0131n ne oldu\u011fu konusunda hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yer almamaktad\u0131r. Oysa somut olayda yarg\u0131 mercilerinin \u00d6.Y.ye mutlaka kullanmas\u0131 gereken ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n verilmemesi ile \u00d6.Y.nin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc aras\u0131nda uygun illiyet ba\u011f\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda kanaate varabilmesi i\u00e7in an\u0131lan hususlar hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. \u0130la\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli kullanan epilepsi hastalar\u0131nda ani \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclebilmesi, devletin g\u00f6zetimi alt\u0131nda tutulan epilepsi hastas\u0131na mutlaka kullanmas\u0131 gereken ila\u00e7lar\u0131n verilmemesi ile epilepsiden ileri gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm aras\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir zaman illiyet ba\u011f\u0131 kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde yorumlanmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Bunun aksine yap\u0131lacak yorum devletin, g\u00f6zetimi alt\u0131nda tutulan epilepsi hastalar\u0131n\u0131n bu hastal\u0131ktan kaynaklanan \u00f6l\u00fcmlerindenher h\u00e2l\u00fck\u00e2rda sorumlu tutulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcn\u00fc gerektirir. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvuruya konu yarg\u0131lamada yap\u0131lan incelemenin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun gerekliliklerini kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucular aksini iddia etse de ba\u015fvuruya konu yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucular ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile her bir ba\u015fvurucu i\u00e7in 1.000.000 TL manevi tazminat ve 1.000.000 TL maddi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100). Ayr\u0131ca manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 200.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n ba\u015fvuruculara m\u00fc\u015ftereken \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ba\u015fvurucular, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi ve belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usulboyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011fininya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Ceza Dairesine (E.2019\/1404, K.2021\/678) iletilmek \u00fczere Adana 14. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2018\/12, K.2019\/116) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvuruculara net 200.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.287,60TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvuruculara M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 10\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/26341 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 BAYRAM YABA VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/26341) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Murat \u0130lter DEVEC\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Bayram YABA \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Kadriye YABA \u00a0 \u00a0 3. C\u00fcneyt YABA \u00a0 \u00a0 4. Erkan YABA Vekili : Av. P\u0131nar YAL\u00c7IN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na izin verilmeyen h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6lmesi ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular Bayram Yaba ve Kadriye Yaba\u2019n\u0131n o\u011flu, di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ise karde\u015fi olan 1997 do\u011fumlu \u00d6.Y., hakk\u0131nda verilen ve kesinle\u015fen h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n infaz\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda bir s\u00fcre Adana E Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda tutulmu\u015ftur. Tutulma s\u00fcrecinde \u00d6.Y. hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen baz\u0131 belgelerde \u00d6.Y.nin epilepsi (sara) hastas\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. 3. \u00d6.Y. 8\/2\/2018 tarihinde Adana A\u00e7\u0131k Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) nakledilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ak\u015fam saatlerinde Ceza Kurumuna giren \u00d6.Y. g\u00f6revlilere epilepsi hastas\u0131 oldu\u011fu s\u00f6yleyip yan\u0131nda getirdi\u011fi iki ilac\u0131 kullanmak zorunda oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. G\u00f6revliler re\u00e7etesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ve \u00d6.Y.ye ertesi g\u00fcn revirden teslim alabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyerek …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n