T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MEHMET \u015e\u0130R\u0130N DURDU BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40206)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Tu\u011f\u00e7e TAKCI<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mehmet \u015eirin DURDU<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ali ARSLAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, hatal\u0131 ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi i\u00e7eren m\u00fcddetnameye itiraz\u0131n yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle reddedilmesi nedeniyle de ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 22\/4\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne ve ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
4.Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Malatya Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemesinin (DGM) 25\/4\/1995 tarihli karar\u0131yla PKK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda 1992, 1993 y\u0131llar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemler nedeniyle 1\/3\/1926 tarihli ve 765 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 125. maddesi gere\u011fince \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. 765 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun’un 59. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 devam eden ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 1\/6\/2017 tarihli m\u00fcddetnamede 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 107. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince ba\u015fvurucunun hak ederek tahliye tarihi 23\/10\/2029, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi ise 25\/10\/2023 olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131nda 23\/3\/2023 tarihinden itibaren denetimli serbestlik uygulanmak suretiyle sal\u0131verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu 25\/1\/2021 tarihinde 4\/11\/2004 tarihli ve 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Uygulama \u015eekli Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 6. maddesi ve 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu’nun 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hakk\u0131nda lehe h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanarak 24-25 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 \u00fczerinden m\u00fcddetnamesinin yeniden d\u00fczenlenmesi talebiyle Siverek \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (\u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 18\/2\/2021 tarihli kararla “…m\u00fcddetnamesinde herhangi bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcddetnamenin usul ve yasaya uygun olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan…” gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz\u0131 Siverek 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) 12\/3\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla “…karar\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, karar\u0131n g\u00f6stermi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7eye, gerek\u00e7enin mevzuatla ve y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki yasa h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ileuygunluk g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, verilen karar ve dosyadaki delillerle uyumlu oldu\u011fundan…” gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Nihai karar 23\/3\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f olup ba\u015fvurucu 22\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
10. Su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun’un 125. maddesinin 14\/7\/2004 tarihli ve 5218 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00d6l\u00fcm Cezas\u0131n\u0131n Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilmeden \u00f6nceki k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti topraklar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 bir ecnebi devlet idaresine ge\u00e7irme\u011fe veya devletin istiklalini tenkise veyahut memleketin bir par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmet idaresinden \u00e7\u0131karma\u011fa te\u015febb\u00fcs eden kimse idama mahk\u00fcm olur. “<\/p>\n
11. 3\/8\/2002 tarihli ve 4771 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun’un 1. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“A) Sava\u015f ve \u00e7ok yak\u0131n sava\u015f tehdidi h\u00e2llerinde i\u015flenmi\u015f su\u00e7lar i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen idam cezalar\u0131 hari\u00e7 olmak \u00fczere, 1.3.1926 tarihli ve 765 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu, 7.1.1932 tarihli ve 1918 say\u0131l\u0131 Ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Men ve Takibine Dair Kanun ile 31.8.1956 tarihli ve 6831 say\u0131l\u0131 Orman Kanununda yer alan idam cezalar\u0131 m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.”<\/p>\n
12. 5218 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun’un 1. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
” A) 1.3.1926 tarihli ve 765 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununun;<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
\u00a0(3) 13 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilk c\u00fcmlesi a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
A\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131, a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet, m\u00fcebbet veya muvakkattir.<\/p>\n
A\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131 ve m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131<\/p>\n
\u00a0h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn hayat\u0131 boyunca devam eder.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
24) 125 inci maddesinde yer alan ‘\u00f6l\u00fcm’ ibaresi, ‘a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r<\/p>\n
\u00a0hapis’ olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.’<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
E) 13.7.1965 tarihli ve 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Cezalar\u0131n \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun;<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
3) 19 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan ‘T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmemesine karar verilenler 30’ ibaresi, ‘A\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler 25’ olarak, ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan ‘T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmemesine karar verilenlerin 33’ ibaresi, ‘a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin 29’ olarak, ayn\u0131 f\u0131krada yer alan ‘T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmemesine karar verilenlerin 36’ ibaresi, ‘a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin 32’ olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
5) Ge\u00e7ici 10 uncu maddesinden sonra gelmek \u00fczere a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki ge\u00e7ici maddeler<\/p>\n
eklenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 MADDE 11. – \u00d6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131 3.8.2002 tarihli ve 4771 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7e\u015fitli Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclenlerin kesinle\u015fmi\u015f cezalar\u0131, bu Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesiyle birlikte, kendili\u011finden a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin, ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irecekleri s\u00fcre ile infaz usul\u00fc, h\u00fckm\u00fc veren mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ve dosya \u00fczerinden saptan\u0131r.’<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
I)…<\/p>\n
\u00d6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131 3.8.2002 tarihli ve 4771 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7e\u015fitli Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclen ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lular\u0131 ile \u00f6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131 a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclen veya a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olan ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lular\u0131 hakk\u0131nda, bu Kanun ve 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Cezalar\u0131n \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun \u015fartla sal\u0131vermeye ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmaz. Bunlar hakk\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131 \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar devam eder.<\/p>\n
…”<\/p>\n
13. 5218 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 11. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“\u00d6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131 3.8.2002 tarihli ve 4771 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7e\u015fitli Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclenlerin kesinle\u015fmi\u015f cezalar\u0131, bu Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesiyle birlikte, kendili\u011finden a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin, ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irecekleri s\u00fcre ile infaz usul\u00fc, h\u00fckm\u00fc veren mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ve dosya \u00fczerinden saptan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
14. 13\/7\/1965 tarihli ve 647 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Cezalar\u0131n \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 19. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
” …<\/p>\n
\u015eartla sal\u0131vermeyi gerektirir mahiyette ceza evi idaresi taraf\u0131ndan verilecek gerek\u00e7eli m\u00fctalaa h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu yerdeki h\u00fckm\u00fc veren mahkeme derecesinde bulunan mahkemeye tevdi edilir. Mahkeme bu m\u00fctalaay\u0131 tasvip etti\u011fi takdirde \u015fartla sal\u0131verme karar\u0131 derhal yerine getirilir.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme \u015fartla sal\u0131verme tasvip etmedi\u011fi takdirde gerek\u00e7esini kararda g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n
…”<\/p>\n
15. 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 7. maddesinin (2) ve (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fcl\u00fckte bulunan kanun ile sonradan y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren kanunlar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcmleri farkl\u0131 ise, failin lehine olan kanun uygulan\u0131r ve infaz edilir.\u201d<\/p>\n
Hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesi, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme ve tekerr\u00fcrle ilgili olanlar hari\u00e7; infaz rejimine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler, derhal uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
16. 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “A\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 6. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(De\u011fi\u015fik: 11\/5\/2005 \u2013 5349\/2 md.)<\/p>\n
\u00a0(1) Kanunlarda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ‘a\u011f\u0131r hapis’ cezalar\u0131, ‘hapis’ cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
(2) (De\u011fi\u015fik: 6\/12\/2006 \u2013 5560\/14 md.) 1 Haziran 2005 tarihinden \u00f6nce y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f kanunlarda;<\/p>\n
a) A\u011f\u0131r hapis iken, birinci f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca hapse d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclen cezalar, kanunlar\u0131nda aksine bir h\u00fck\u00fcm yoksa alt s\u0131n\u0131r bir y\u0131l, \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r yirmid\u00f6rt y\u0131l olarak,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
17.3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “\u015eartla sal\u0131verilme” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinin 29\/6\/2006 tarihli ve 5532 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilmeden \u00f6nceki h\u00e2linin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bu Kanun kapsam\u0131na giren su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbm olanlardan, T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmemesine karar verilenler 36 y\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler 30 y\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer \u015fahs\u00ee h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezalara mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olanlar h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00fcresinin 3\/4’\u00fcn\u00fc \u00e7ekmi\u015f olup da iyi halli h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc niteli\u011finde bulunduklar\u0131 takdirde talepleri olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u015fartla sal\u0131verilirler.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Bu Kanun kapsam\u0131na giren su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbm olanlar, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin kesinle\u015fme tarihinden sonra bu Kanunun kapsam\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7u i\u015flemeleri halinde, \u015fartla sal\u0131verilmeden yararlanamazlar.<\/p>\n
\u00a0Bu h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler hakk\u0131nda, 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Cezalar\u0131n \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 19 uncu maddesinin bir ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile Ek 2 nci maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmaz.”<\/p>\n
18. 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinin g\u00fcncel h\u00e2linin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…Bu Kanun kapsam\u0131na giren su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbm olanlar hakk\u0131nda, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme ve denetimli serbestlik tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 107 nci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 108 inci maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r. (Ek c\u00fcmle:14\/4\/2020-7242\/65 md.)…<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
\u00d6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131, 14\/7\/2004 tarihli ve 5218 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 1 inci maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 3\/8\/2002 tarihli ve 4771 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7e\u015fitli Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Kanunla m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclen ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lular\u0131 ile \u00f6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131 a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclen veya a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olan ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lular\u0131 ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararlanamaz. Bunlar hakk\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131 \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar devam eder.”<\/p>\n
19. 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 107. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Su\u00e7 i\u015flemek i\u00e7in \u00f6rg\u00fct kurmak veya y\u00f6netmek ya da \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00e2linde; a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olanlar otuzalt\u0131 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olanlar otuz y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131, s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olanlar cezalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te ikisini infaz kurumunda \u00e7ektikleri takdirde, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeden yararlanabilirler…”<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E <\/p>\n
20. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 18\/7\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu; DGM’de yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, DGM’lerin yap\u0131s\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvencelerinden olanba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z mahkemede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un ge\u00e7ici 1. maddesinin (8) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca Anayasa Mahkemesinin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisinin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 23\/9\/2012 tarihi olup Anayasa Mahkemesi, ancak bu tarihten sonra kesinle\u015fen nihai i\u015flem ve kararlar aleyhine yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131 inceleyebilir (Zafer \u00d6zt\u00fcrk, B. No: 2012\/51, 25\/12\/2012, \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda DGM taraf\u0131ndan 25\/4\/1995 tarihinde verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 15\/12\/1995 tarihinde Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan onanarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle somut olayda ba\u015fvuru konusu karar 23\/9\/2012 tarihinden \u00f6nce kesinle\u015fti\u011finden ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa Mahkemesinin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B.Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1.Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu, 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 6. maddesi ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 24, 25 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 \u00fczerinden m\u00fcddetnamesinin yeniden d\u00fczenlenerek tahliyesine karar verilmesine dair talebinin \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi ve A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince yeterince incelemeden yetersiz gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvencelerinden olan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
26. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun yetkili bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbm edilmesi kapsam\u0131nda \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lacak incelemede g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
27. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n \u201cKi\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 19. maddesinin birinci, ikinci ve sekizinci f\u0131kralar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cHerkes, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fine sahiptir.<\/p>\n
\u015eekil ve \u015fartlar\u0131 kanunda g\u00f6sterilen:<\/p>\n
Mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi; … halleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimse h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Her ne sebeple olursa olsun, h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlanan ki\u015fi, k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede durumu hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesini ve bu k\u0131s\u0131tlaman\u0131n kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde hemen serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla yetkili bir yarg\u0131 merciine ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<\/p>\n
…\u201d<\/p>\n
28. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresinin hatal\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131 nedeniyle daha uzun bir s\u00fcre h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve buna ili\u015fkin itiraz\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle reddedilmesi hususu olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurucunun bu iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
a. Kabul Edilebilirlik Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
29. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmay\u0131p kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
b. Esas Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
i. Genel \u0130lkeler<\/p>\n
30.Bir kimse Anayasa’da yer alan di\u011fer sebepler (yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama gibi) d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ancak “Mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi” kapsam\u0131nda h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131labilir. E\u011fer tutman\u0131n k\u0131smen veya tamamen bu ko\u015fullar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilirse bu durumun me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fundan veya \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edilemez ve do\u011frudan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ihlal edilmi\u015f olur (\u015eaban Dal, B. No: 2014\/2891, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7 31).<\/p>\n
31. Mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f mahk\u00fbmiyet kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckten yoksun b\u0131rakma h\u00e2lleri, Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131na d\u00e2hil ise de an\u0131lan kural, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fil tutman\u0131n hukuka uygun olmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu g\u00fcvence kapsam\u0131nda, ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n yerindeli\u011fi veya orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelemeye tabi tutulamaz (G\u00fcnay Okan, B. No: 2013\/8114, 17\/9\/2014, \u00a7 18).<\/p>\n
32. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen “mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi” ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 bir ihlal iddias\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi ki\u015finin h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen ya da tamamen bu ko\u015fullarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fini tespit etmekle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r. Bir kimsenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n an\u0131lan h\u00fckm\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirinin bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilmesi, ikinci olarak yerine getirilecek karar\u0131n h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerine ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbiri i\u00e7ermeyen bir karara dayan\u0131larak bir kimsenin h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Son olarak h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lman\u0131n mahkemece verilen h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirinin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmamas\u0131 gerekir (Ercan Bucak (2), B. No: 2014\/11651, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7 40; \u015eaban Dal, \u00a7 32; \u00c7.\u00d6. [GK], B. No: 2014\/5927, 19\/7\/2018, \u00a7 33; Muhamed Sira\u00e7 Bozkurt, B. No: 2016\/7271, 24\/10\/2019, \u00a7 41).<\/p>\n
33.Bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l infaz edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesi a\u00e7\u0131k bir h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7ermemektedir. Bununla birlikte herkesin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 ve bu hakka getirilebilecek s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak madde metinlerinde belirtilmesi keyf\u00ee bir bi\u00e7imde bu haktan kimsenin mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Yetkili bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilen bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve ceza infaz kurumunda tutma s\u00fcresi de bu hak kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Ceza mahkemelerinin karar\u0131na uygun hareket edilmesi de hakk\u0131n korunmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir zorunluluktur. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin ceza infaz kurumunda kalacaklar\u0131 s\u00fcrenin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na ve ilgili yasal mevzuata uygun olmas\u0131 Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesi kapsam\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u0130brahim Uysal, B. No: 2014\/1711, 23\/7\/2014, \u00a7 32).<\/p>\n
34. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn af yasas\u0131ndan ya da ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme gibi kurumlardan otomatik olarak yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almamaktad\u0131r (\u0130srafil Hurman, B. No: 2014\/1782, 9\/6\/2016, \u00a7 33). Ancak ko\u015fullu sal\u0131vermeden yararlanmak i\u00e7in kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen t\u00fcm \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ilgili yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n takdir yetkisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (belli bir s\u00fcrenin \u00e7ekilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu) durumlarda ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmamas\u0131, ki\u015filerin keyf\u00ee olarak h\u00fcrriyetlerinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131 yasaklayan Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayacakt\u0131r (Ercan Bucak (2), \u00a7 44; \u015eaban Dal, \u00a7 36; Muhamed Sira\u00e7 Bozkurt, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
35. Bu ba\u011flamda m\u00fcddetnamenin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re do\u011fru bir \u015fekilde hesaplan\u0131p hesaplanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti, ba\u015fvurucunun hukuk sistemince belirlenenden daha fazla bir s\u00fcre h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun kalmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda -mahkemece verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131 olarak- hukuka uygun bir tutma niteli\u011finde bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nem arz etmektedir (Muhamed Sira\u00e7 Bozkurt, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
ii. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
36. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda DGM’nin 25\/4\/1995 tarihli karar\u0131yla 1992, 1993 y\u0131llar\u0131nda PKK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemler nedeniyle 765 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun’un 125. maddesi gere\u011fince \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131 karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f, bu ceza ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 59. maddesi uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7evrilmi\u015ftir. Yani infaza konu olan netice ceza \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131ndan \u00e7evrilen m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetine esas eylemi ise ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. Sonraki y\u0131llarda, 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 6. maddesi ile a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun cezas\u0131 da m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
37. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 7. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda da kural olarak infaz rejimine ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemelerde derh\u00e2l uygulan\u0131rl\u0131k ilkesinin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f fakat ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeyle ilgili d\u00fczenlemelerin bunun istisnas\u0131 oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme zaman\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne \u00e7eken b\u00fct\u00fcn mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinden h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin yararland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Bu ba\u011flamda, ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi i\u00e7in, somut ba\u015fvuruda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 7. maddesi gere\u011fince su\u00e7 tarihi itibar\u0131yla cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurucu lehine olan mevzuat\u0131n belirlenip buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak mahkemece verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 cezan\u0131n olmas\u0131 gerekenden fazla yerine getirilip getirilmedi\u011finin ve sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun ceza infaz kurumunda tutuldu\u011fu s\u00fcrenin hukuka uygun bir tutma niteli\u011finde bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
38. \u00d6ncelikle 1991 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17. maddesi metninin ilk h\u00e2line g\u00f6re 1992-1993 y\u0131llar\u0131 olan su\u00e7 tarihi itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmesi i\u00e7in iyi h\u00e2lli ge\u00e7irmesi gereken s\u00fcrenin otuz y\u0131l oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (bkz. \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
39. \u00d6te yandan 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5532 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilmeden \u00f6nceki h\u00e2lindeki 17. maddesine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 647 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun’un 19. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (bkz. \u00a7 17).<\/p>\n
40. Ayr\u0131ca 4771 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun ve 5218 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun ile \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131 yerine temel ceza olarak uygulanmas\u0131 gereken ceza, kanun gere\u011fi de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Ancak bu d\u00fczenleme ile cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak lehe ya da aleyhe bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olup (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 11, 13) somut ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda 647 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeye ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
41. Son olarak 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17. maddesi metninin g\u00fcncel h\u00e2linde, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 eylemler nedeniyle h\u00fckmedilen hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 107. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde (bkz. \u00a7 18), 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 107. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re \u00f6rg\u00fct faaliyeti \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flenen su\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f ki\u015filerin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n otuz y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131 iyi h\u00e2lli olarak ceza infaz kurumunda \u00e7ekmeleri durumunda ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeden yararlanabilecekleri anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 19).<\/p>\n
42. 5252 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 6. maddesi ile sadece a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n hapis cezas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olup bu durumun ceza infaz kurumunda \u00e7ekilmesi gereken mahk\u00fbmiyet s\u00fcresine bir etkisi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ter\u00f6r ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 eylemleri nedeniyle \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131ndan \u00e7evrilen m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hesaplamada ve lehe kanun de\u011ferlendirilmesinde ba\u015fvurucunun lehine olarak hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n otuz y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131 iyi h\u00e2lli olarak ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irmesi durumunda ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeye hak kazanaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
43. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki 1\/6\/2017 tarihli m\u00fcddetnameye g\u00f6re de 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17. maddesindeki at\u0131fla, 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 107. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 lehe kanun olarak tespit edilmi\u015f ve ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi otuz y\u0131l \u00fczerinden hesaplanarak ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi 25\/10\/2023 olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 6, 18).<\/p>\n
44. Yukar\u0131da yer verilen yasal d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fince ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda verilen m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak verilen kararda mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine bir ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n herhangi bir keyf\u00eelik i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 olarak h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lman\u0131n mahkemece verilen h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezan\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
45. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM <\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/40206 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MEHMET \u015e\u0130R\u0130N DURDU BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40206) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Tu\u011f\u00e7e TAKCI Ba\u015fvurucu : Mehmet \u015eirin DURDU Vekili : Av. Ali ARSLAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, hatal\u0131 ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi i\u00e7eren m\u00fcddetnameye itiraz\u0131n yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle reddedilmesi nedeniyle de ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 22\/4\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne ve ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4.Ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekleri ile Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Malatya Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemesinin (DGM) 25\/4\/1995 tarihli karar\u0131yla PKK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda 1992, 1993 y\u0131llar\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemler nedeniyle …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18876","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n