{"id":18873,"date":"2024-12-03T10:34:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-03T07:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2024-12-03T10:34:00","modified_gmt":"2024-12-03T07:34:00","slug":"aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc ENERJ\u0130 VE \u00dcRET\u0130M ORGAN\u0130ZASYON SAN. T\u0130C. LTD. \u015eT\u0130.<\/p>\n<p>   BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/28399)<\/p>\n<p>   Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   KARAR<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n<p>   \u00dcyeler<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n<p>   Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   \u015eahap KAYMAK<\/p>\n<p>   Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc Enerji ve \u00dcretim Organizasyon San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti.<\/p>\n<p>   Temsilcisi<\/p>\n<p>   :<\/p>\n<p>   Orhan OKUR<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n<p>1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin, gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan karar\u0131n tefhim edildi\u011fi tarihten ba\u015flat\u0131larak istinaf talebinin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>2. Ba\u015fvurucunun icra hukuk mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve taraf konumunda oldu\u011fu \u015fik\u00e2yet davas\u0131nda verilen karara ili\u015fkin olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusu, kanun yolu s\u00fcresinin ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n tefhim tarihinden ba\u015flat\u0131larak hesaplanmas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ek karar ile reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu ek karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; istinaf mahkemesi kanun yoluna ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011funu belirterek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun usulden reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>3. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 29\/7\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 24\/8\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla 12\/2\/2024 tarihine kadar ge\u00e7erli olan s\u00fcreli vek\u00e2letname sunuldu\u011fundan Anayasa Mahkemesinin 1\/2\/2024 tarihli m\u00fczekkeresi ile ba\u015fvurucu \u015eirket temsilcisinden g\u00fcncel vek\u00e2letnamenin asl\u0131 veya onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi talep edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu \u015eirket temsilcisi 1\/3\/2024 tarihli m\u00fczekkere cevab\u0131nda ba\u015fvuruyu \u015fahsen takip edece\u011fini bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>4. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n<p>A. Mahkemeye Eri\u015fim Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n<p>5. Anayasa Mahkemesi, somut ba\u015fvuru ile ayn\u0131 nitelikteki ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 inceledi\u011fi R\u00fcstem G\u00fcl (B. No: 2021\/26038, 22\/11\/2023) karar\u0131nda, uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi; gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015f bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhim edilmi\u015f bir h\u00fck\u00fcm olarak say\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011f ya da tefhim edilmeden kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurma s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi; ba\u015fvurucunun k\u0131sa kararla birlikte karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini \u00f6\u011frenemedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla karar gerek\u00e7esini bilmeyen ba\u015fvurucudan k\u0131sa karar\u0131n tefhiminden itibaren istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmas\u0131n\u0131 beklemenin ba\u015fvurucuya a\u011f\u0131r bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi bu durumda kanun yolu merciinin somut olay\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131nda istinaf s\u00fcresini, ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klanmadan tefhim tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flatmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yorumunun \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez nitelikte oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun katlanmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00fclfetin hedeflenen me\u015fru ama\u00e7la orant\u0131s\u0131z oldu\u011fu, m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 41, 42).<\/p>\n<p>6. Somut ba\u015fvuruda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu itibarla Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n<p>7. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesinden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Somut ba\u015fvurunun dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na d\u00e2hil olup, ayr\u0131ca davalar\u0131n en az giderle ve m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revi oldu\u011funu belirten Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 141. maddesinin de Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnselli\u011fi ilkesi gere\u011fi, makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (Selahattin Aky\u0131l, B. No: 2012\/1198, 7\/11\/2013, \u00a7 39). Medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerle ilgili uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klara ili\u015fkin makul s\u00fcre de\u011ferlendirmesinde, s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 kural olarak, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 karara ba\u011flayacak yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinin i\u015fletilmeye ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n ikame edildi\u011fi tarih olup s\u00fcrenin biti\u015f tarihi ise \u00e7o\u011fu zaman icra a\u015famas\u0131n\u0131 da kapsayacak \u015fekilde yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sona erme tarihidir (G\u00fcher Ergun ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2012\/13, 2\/7\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 50-52). Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda Tokat \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinde 24\/10\/2018 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n 18\/6\/2020 tarihli Samsun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 4. Hukuk Dairesi karar\u0131 ile kesinle\u015fti\u011fi, bu h\u00e2liyle iki dereceli yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k 1 y\u0131l 7 ay s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tespit edilmi\u015f olup an\u0131lan ilkeler ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer ba\u015fvurularda verdi\u011fi kararlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu s\u00fcrenin makul oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>8. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n<p>9. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 5.000 TL tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100). \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>10. Dosyadaki belgelerden bireysel ba\u015fvurunun -sonradan vek\u00e2let s\u00fcresi sona eren- avukat vas\u0131tas\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun avukat\u0131 ile aras\u0131ndaki vek\u00e2let ili\u015fkisi s\u00fcreli vek\u00e2letname ile sona ermi\u015f olsa da bireysel ba\u015fvurunun avukat arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yap\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebiyle ba\u015fvurucu lehine vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n<p>A. 1. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n<p>2. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n<p>B. Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Tokat \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesine (E.2019\/200, K.2019\/223) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>E. 446,90 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.246,90 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n<p>F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 12\/6\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 12\/6\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc ENERJ\u0130 VE \u00dcRET\u0130M ORGAN\u0130ZASYON SAN. T\u0130C. LTD. \u015eT\u0130. BA\u015eVURUSU \u00a0 (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/28399) Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024 \u00a0 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eahap KAYMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc Enerji ve \u00dcretim Organizasyon San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. Temsilcisi : Orhan OKUR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin, gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan karar\u0131n tefhim edildi\u011fi tarihten ba\u015flat\u0131larak istinaf talebinin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun icra hukuk mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve taraf konumunda oldu\u011fu \u015fik\u00e2yet davas\u0131nda verilen karara ili\u015fkin olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusu, kanun yolu s\u00fcresinin ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n tefhim tarihinden ba\u015flat\u0131larak hesaplanmas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ek karar ile reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu ek karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; istinaf mahkemesi kanun yoluna ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011funu belirterek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun usulden reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 29\/7\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 24\/8\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>AYM&#039;nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM&#039;nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc ENERJ\u0130 VE \u00dcRET\u0130M ORGAN\u0130ZASYON SAN. T\u0130C. LTD. \u015eT\u0130. BA\u015eVURUSU \u00a0 (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/28399) Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024 \u00a0 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eahap KAYMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc Enerji ve \u00dcretim Organizasyon San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. Temsilcisi : Orhan OKUR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin, gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan karar\u0131n tefhim edildi\u011fi tarihten ba\u015flat\u0131larak istinaf talebinin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun icra hukuk mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve taraf konumunda oldu\u011fu \u015fik\u00e2yet davas\u0131nda verilen karara ili\u015fkin olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusu, kanun yolu s\u00fcresinin ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n tefhim tarihinden ba\u015flat\u0131larak hesaplanmas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ek karar ile reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu ek karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; istinaf mahkemesi kanun yoluna ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011funu belirterek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun usulden reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 29\/7\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 24\/8\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-03T07:34:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"7\u00a0Minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-03T07:34:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1364,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\",\"Uncategorized\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-03T07:34:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u00dc\u00c7L\u00dc ENERJ\u0130 VE \u00dcRET\u0130M ORGAN\u0130ZASYON SAN. T\u0130C. LTD. \u015eT\u0130. BA\u015eVURUSU \u00a0 (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/28399) Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2024 \u00a0 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eahap KAYMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc Enerji ve \u00dcretim Organizasyon San. Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. Temsilcisi : Orhan OKUR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin, gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131klanmayan karar\u0131n tefhim edildi\u011fi tarihten ba\u015flat\u0131larak istinaf talebinin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucunun icra hukuk mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve taraf konumunda oldu\u011fu \u015fik\u00e2yet davas\u0131nda verilen karara ili\u015fkin olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusu, kanun yolu s\u00fcresinin ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n tefhim tarihinden ba\u015flat\u0131larak hesaplanmas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ek karar ile reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu ek karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; istinaf mahkemesi kanun yoluna ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle an\u0131lan karar\u0131n kesin oldu\u011funu belirterek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun usulden reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 29\/7\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 24\/8\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda &hellip;","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2024-12-03T07:34:00+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"7\u00a0Minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2024-12-03T07:34:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":1364,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler","Uncategorized"],"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-03T07:34:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2020-28399-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM&#8217;nin 2020\/28399 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}