T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MERVE NUR TEK\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21108)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Merve Nur TEK\u0130N<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ahmet Yavuz YILMAZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir g\u00f6steride s\u00f6ylenen mar\u015fa e\u015flik etmesi ve slogan atmas\u0131 nedeniyle ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. 2014 y\u0131l\u0131 May\u0131s ay\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r’\u0131n Lice il\u00e7esinde, s\u0131n\u0131r b\u00f6lgelerindeki karakol in\u015faatlar\u0131n\u0131 protesto etmek amac\u0131yla eylemler yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; s\u00f6z konusu g\u00f6steriler esnas\u0131nda aralar\u0131nda kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin de oldu\u011fu \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015fi yaralanm\u0131\u015f, 7\/6\/2014 tarihinde R.B ve B.A. hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. 10\/6\/2014 tarihinde kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 tarihte Ardahan \u00d6\u011frencileri Derne\u011finin Lice’de meydana gelen olaylar\u0131 protesto etmek amac\u0131yla organize etti\u011fi toplant\u0131ya, aralar\u0131nda Bar\u0131\u015f ve Demokrasi Partisi il te\u015fkilat\u0131na mensup \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n da oldu\u011fu yakla\u015f\u0131k y\u00fcz ki\u015fi kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Grup “Her Yer Lice Her Yer Direni\u015f” yazan bir afi\u015fle y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f yapm\u0131\u015f, gruptan bir ki\u015finin K\u00fcrt\u00e7e ” …davam\u0131z ve \u015fehitlerimiz an\u0131s\u0131na bir dakikal\u0131k sayg\u0131 duru\u015funa davet ediyorum.” \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zleri \u00fczerine sayg\u0131 duru\u015funda bulunulmu\u015f, akabinde bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, s\u0131n\u0131r boyunca yap\u0131lan karakol in\u015faatlar\u0131 ile bu nedenle yap\u0131lan protestolarda hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden ve yaralanan kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lara dikkat \u00e7ekilmi\u015f; kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin sert m\u00fcdahalede bulunmas\u0131 ele\u015ftirilmi\u015f ve durumun takip edilece\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Grup, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131ndan sonra sloganlar atarak tekrar ayn\u0131 g\u00fczerg\u00e2hta y\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f ve akabinde kendili\u011finden da\u011f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. 9\/7\/2014 tarihli G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Tespit Te\u015fhis ve Analiz Tutana\u011f\u0131’na ba\u015fvurucunun protesto esnas\u0131nda “PKK Halkt\u0131r, Halk Burada” \u015feklinde slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 15\/7\/2014 tarihli fezlekede ise ba\u015fvurucunun T\u00fcrk\u00e7esi “Ya\u015fas\u0131n Ba\u015fkan Apo” olan “Biji Serok Apo” \u015feklinde slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu yedi ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucu ve toplant\u0131ya kat\u0131lan \u00dc.B., S.Y. ve S.T.nin “Biji Serok Apo” \u015feklinde, M.Z.T.nin ise “Biji Serok Apo” ve “PKK Halkt\u0131r, Halk Burada” \u015feklinde slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131 F.\u00d6.n\u00fcn PKK\/KCK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn mar\u015f\u0131 olan Gerilla Mar\u015f\u0131’n\u0131 okuttu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. “Biji Serok Apo” \u015feklinde slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yarg\u0131lanan ba\u015fvurucu, 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu\u2019nun 7. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan 6.000 TL adli para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; yarg\u0131lanan di\u011fer \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda her bir san\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kabul edilen eylemleri a\u00e7\u0131klamadan, genel bir de\u011ferlendirme yaparak ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu t\u00fcm san\u0131klar\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn mar\u015f\u0131na i\u015ftirak etti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Olay tarihinde san\u0131klar\u0131n i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 grubun Lice il\u00e7esinde meydana gelen olaylar\u0131 protesto etmek amac\u0131 ile y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f yapt\u0131klar\u0131, y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f esnas\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine slogan att\u0131klar\u0131, k\u00fcrt\u00e7e mar\u015flar s\u00f6yledikleri ve kendilerinden da\u011f\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131, g\u00f6steri esnas\u0131nda s\u00f6ylenen k\u00fcrt\u00e7e mar\u015f \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan bilirki\u015fi incelemesinde mar\u015f\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc PKK’n\u0131n mar\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131nda anla\u015f\u0131lmakla;<\/p>\n
Her ne kadar san\u0131klar \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flemediklerinin iddia etmi\u015flerse de, g\u00f6steri esnas\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f yapan grubu ba\u015f\u0131ndan sonuna kadar kamerayla kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ve yine slogan atan ki\u015filerin foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekildi\u011fi, dosya i\u00e7erisinde bulunan cd lerden anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n olay g\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131k net bir bi\u00e7imde ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine slogan att\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi ve duyulmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda slogan at\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik beyanlar\u0131na itibar edilmemi\u015f,<\/p>\n
San\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00f6steri esnas\u0131nda s\u00f6ylemi\u015f oldu\u011fu k\u00fcrt\u00e7e mar\u015f\u0131n yapt\u0131r\u0131lan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlemesinde PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn mar\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n da bu mar\u015fa i\u015ftirak ettiklerinin tespit edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda da \u00fczerlerine at\u0131l\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapmak su\u00e7u i\u015fledikleri kanaati has\u0131l olmu\u015f, su\u00e7tan kurtulmaya y\u00f6nelik tipik savunmaya itibar edilmemi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
6. Yarg\u0131tay an\u0131lan karar\u0131 23\/6\/2021 tarihinde onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 25\/1\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 11\/2\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Anayasa Mahkemesinin talebi \u00fczerine ilk derece mahkemesi 2\/2\/2023 tarihindeba\u015fvurucunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na esas al\u0131nan G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Kay\u0131t \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm Tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Mahkeme olay yeri CD’sinde san\u0131klar\u0131n att\u0131\u011f\u0131 sloganlar\u0131n vesloganlar\u0131n anlamlar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrk\u00e7eye \u00e7evrilmesi, ayr\u0131ca san\u0131klar\u0131n topluluk i\u00e7inde s\u00f6yledi\u011fi slogan\u0131n mar\u015f olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde toplulukta s\u00f6ylenen sloganlar\u0131n ve mar\u015f\u0131n T\u00fcrk\u00e7e anlamlar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir belge g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Tutanaklara g\u00f6re toplant\u0131da “Biji serok Apo (Ya\u015fas\u0131n Ba\u015fkan Apo)”, “\u015eehit nam\u0131r\u0131n (\u015eehitler \u00f6lmez)”, “Kurdistan goristan ji fa\u015f\u0131stan (K\u00fcrdistan fa\u015fizme mezar olacak)” \u015feklinde sloganlar at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve Cerxa \u015eero\u015fe (Devrim \u00c7ark\u0131) isimli mar\u015f s\u00f6ylenmi\u015ftir (an\u0131lan mar\u015f\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi i\u00e7in bkz. Meki Katar [GK], B. No: 2015\/4916, 3\/10\/2019, \u00a7 12).<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne esas al\u0131nan slogan\u0131n belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten ba\u015fvurucu, \u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 niteli\u011finde olmayan slogan nedeniyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesi uyar\u0131nca adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ilk olarak ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti kapsam\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun “Biji Serok Apo” \u015feklinde slogan atmas\u0131 nedeniyle verilen adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninde gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilirken ter\u00f6r\u00fc me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131ran, \u00f6ven ya da buna te\u015fvik eden s\u00f6zlerin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fine y\u00f6nelik Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvuru, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 7. maddesinin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131n\u0131rlama sebeplerinden kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011finin korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu belirlemenin ard\u0131ndan demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nce pek \u00e7ok karar\u0131nda propaganda su\u00e7unun soyut tehlike su\u00e7u olarak kabul edilmesinin ba\u015fta ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olmak \u00fczere anayasal hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler \u00fczerinde bir bask\u0131 olu\u015fturma potansiyeli oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple bir propaganda faaliyetinin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in olay\u0131n somut \u015fartlar\u0131nda belirli oranda tehlikeye neden oldu\u011funun g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir (di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndan bkz. Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2018\/17635, 26\/7\/2019, \u00a7 84; Ay\u015fe \u00c7elik, B. No: 2017\/36722, 9\/5\/2019, \u00a7 47; S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder [GK], B. No: 2018\/38143, 3\/10\/2019, \u00a7 64; Meki Katar, \u00a7 53; \u00d6mer Faruk Gergerlio\u011flu [GK], B. No: 2019\/10634, 1\/7\/2021, \u00a7 175; ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7unun T\u00fcrk hukukundaki g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcne ili\u015fkin tespitler i\u00e7in Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 115-118; ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131na ve su\u00e7un tespitine y\u00f6nelik de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u00d6mer Faruk Gergerlio\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 155-163, 175; Figen Y\u00fcksekda\u011f \u015eeno\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2016\/39759, 30\/3\/2022, \u00a7 73; Ahmet Aslan, B. No: 2021\/23949, 6\/10\/2022, \u00a7 54; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 86)<\/p>\n
12. Bunun yan\u0131nda bir usul g\u00fcvencesi olan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n maddi haklara etkisi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de Anayasa Mahkemesi, \u00e7ok say\u0131da karar\u0131nda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne gerek\u00e7esiz olarak veya Anayasa Mahkemesince ortaya konulan kriterleri kar\u015f\u0131lamayan bir gerek\u00e7e ile yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalelerin Anayasa’n\u0131n ilgili maddelerini ihlal edece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir (di\u011ferleri aras\u0131ndan bkz. Ayhan \u00d6lmez ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/15090, 11\/2\/2021, \u00a7 46; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, B. No: 2014\/1577, 25\/10\/2017, \u00a7 58; Tansel \u00c7\u00f6la\u015fan, B. No: 2014\/6128, 7\/7\/2015, \u00a7 56; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 120; S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder, \u00a7 60; Candar \u015eafak D\u00f6nmez [GK], B. No: 2015\/15672, 5\/11\/2020, \u00a7 53; Atilla Yazar ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/1635, 5\/7\/2022, \u00a7 127). O h\u00e2lde Anayasa Mahkemesince \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlemesi gereken mesele, yarg\u0131 mercinin ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerle, ki\u015fileri ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flenmesine te\u015fvik etti\u011fini ya da bunlar\u0131 me\u015fru g\u00f6stermek niyetinde bulundu\u011funu ikna edici bir bi\u00e7imde ortaya koyup koymad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r (Candar \u015eafak D\u00f6nmez, \u00a7 52). An\u0131lan inceleme, ilk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan gerek\u00e7eli kararda ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyeti i\u00e7in g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine sloganlara ve PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn oldu\u011fu kabul edilen bir mar\u015f\u0131n s\u00f6ylenmesine i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Kararda, bahse konu mar\u015f\u0131n PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn mar\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015f ancak mar\u015f\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine ve \u015fiddete te\u015fvik edip etmedi\u011fine dair hi\u00e7bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca kararda, ba\u015fvurucunun hangi ifadesinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle farkl\u0131 s\u00f6ylemleri nedeniyle yarg\u0131lanan -ve aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da oldu\u011fu- \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetlerine esas al\u0131nan ifadelerin ne oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun hangi ifadelerinin ne surette ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fiddet ve tehdit y\u00f6ntemlerini me\u015fru g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi veya \u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ya da bu y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Di\u011fer yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda, PKK’n\u0131n kurucusu olan A.\u00d6.y\u00fc politik bir lider ve toplumsal sorunlar\u0131n demokratik yollarla \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde me\u015fru bir akt\u00f6r olarak ilan eden s\u00f6ylemleri ya da bu nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda yarg\u0131 mercilerince ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ortaya konamam\u0131\u015f ifadeleri, ter\u00f6r eylemlerinin failini \u00f6ven ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn cebir, \u015fiddet veya tehdit i\u00e7eren y\u00f6ntemlerine ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik eden mesajlar olarak de\u011ferlendirmemi\u015ftir (S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder \u00a7\u00a7 69-87; Meki Katar, \u00a7 58; Zerga \u00d6zt\u00fcrkB. No: 2015\/4556, 9\/1\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 40-49; an\u0131lan ifadelerin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. M.M.B., B. No: 2015\/15088, 8\/1\/2020, \u00a7 58; ayr\u0131ca bkz. Baver M\u0131zrak, B. No: 2015\/19280, 9\/1\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 48-53). Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesi Cerxa \u015eero\u015fe mar\u015f\u0131n\u0131n (Devrim \u00c7ark\u0131) bir toplant\u0131da s\u00f6ylenmesini de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fi Meki Katar karar\u0131nda; mar\u015f vas\u0131tas\u0131yla kamuya aktar\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin ba\u015fkalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan de\u011fersiz, yarars\u0131z, k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 veya rahats\u0131z edici g\u00f6r\u00fclse bile ki\u015filerin subjektif de\u011ferlendirmelerinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn korumas\u0131nda oldu\u011funu vurgulam\u0131\u015f; \u00f6znel de\u011ferlendirmeler veya varsay\u0131mlarla ki\u015filerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131na bu \u015fekilde m\u00fcdahale edilmesinin temel hakk\u0131 ihlal edece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Zikredilen kararda bahse konu mar\u015f ve slogan\u0131n \u015fiddeti yaymas\u0131n\u0131n muhtemel oldu\u011fu, bunun h\u0131zla yay\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulayan ve potansiyel olarak tehlikeli bir etkisi oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren bir delil de g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fi ve \u015fiddeti te\u015fvik edecek nitelikte de olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir (Meki Katar, \u00a7\u00a7 65, 72, 73). Somut olayda da ilk derece mahkemesinin okunan mar\u015f ve at\u0131lan slogan\u0131n ba\u011flam\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6stericilerin davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 irdelemedi\u011fi, s\u00f6ylemlerin hangi surette ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fiddet ve tehdit y\u00f6ntemlerini me\u015fru g\u00f6sterdi\u011fine veya \u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ya da bu y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik etti\u011fine dair bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. \u00d6te yandan somut olaya konu toplant\u0131 uzun s\u00fcredir devam eden ter\u00f6r olaylar\u0131n\u0131n sona erdirilmesi amac\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan, demokratik a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131m olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan s\u00fcre\u00e7te yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n, at\u0131lan sloganlar\u0131n ve okunan mar\u015f\u0131n iki hafta \u00f6nce protesto eylemlerinde meydana gelen ve iki ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne, bir\u00e7ok ki\u015finin de yaralanmas\u0131na neden olan olaya ve kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin tutumlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvuruya konu eylemlerde herhangi bir \u015fiddet olay\u0131n\u0131n da ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
16. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ilk derece mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetinin zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fini ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile ortaya koydu\u011funun kabul edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU ve \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve miktar belirtmeksizin tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
20. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn\u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU ve \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR’\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131oyu ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ardahan A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2014\/119, K.2015\/105) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 30.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 664,10 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.464,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 10\/7\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
May\u0131s 2014 tarihinde Lice\u2019de ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olaylar\u0131 protesto etmek amac\u0131 ile 10 Haziran 2014 tarihinde Ardahan \u00d6\u011frencileri Derne\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan organize edilen Ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu bir grup \u201cHer Yer Lice Her yer Direni\u015f\u201d slogan\u0131 yazan afi\u015fle y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f yapm\u0131\u015f, toplulukta yer alan bir \u015fahs\u0131n \u201cdavam\u0131z ve \u015fehitlerimiz an\u0131s\u0131na sayg\u0131 duru\u015funa davet ediyorum\u201d s\u00f6z\u00fc \u00fczerine sayg\u0131 duru\u015funda bulunulmu\u015f, Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc tespit ve te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131nda Ba\u015fvurucunun y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f esnas\u0131nda \u201cPKK Halkt\u0131r. Halk Burada\u201d \u015feklinde slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131, yine 15.07.2014 tarihli fezlekede \u201cBiji Serok Apo-Ya\u015fas\u0131n Ba\u015fkan Apo\u201d \u015feklinde slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu sloganlara yer verildi\u011fi gibi Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu grup taraf\u0131ndan k\u00fcrt\u00e7e olarak (Gerilla Mar\u015f\u0131 olarak bilinen) PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn mar\u015f\u0131n\u0131n da okundu\u011fu belirtilerek Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda adli para cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede \u00e7o\u011funluk taraf\u0131ndan Mahkeme karar\u0131nda mar\u015f\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fine de\u011finilmedi\u011fi, Ba\u015fvurucunun hangi ifadesinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu,Ba\u015fvurucunun hangi ifadesinin ne surette ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn \u015fiddet ve tehdit y\u00f6ntemlerini me\u015fru g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi veya \u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn anla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvuruya konu eylemlerde herhangi bir \u015fiddet olay\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonu\u00e7 olarak mahkumiyetin zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fini ilgi ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e ile a\u00e7\u0131klayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek, Ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasan\u0131n 26. Maddesinde yer alan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.Ba\u015fvurucunun ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u00c7o\u011funluk taraf\u0131ndan ula\u015f\u0131lan sonuca a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gerek\u00e7elerle kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz. \u015e\u00f6yle ki;<\/p>\n
Mahkeme karar\u0131nda mar\u015f\u0131n s\u00f6zlerine de\u011finilmemi\u015f ise de s\u00f6z konusu mar\u015f\u0131n PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyelerince s\u00f6ylendi\u011fi, K\u00fcrdistan\u2019\u0131n PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn saflar\u0131nda \u00f6lenlerin kan\u0131 \u00fczerinde hayat buldu\u011fu ve direni\u015fe \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulundu\u011fu, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn amac\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6lenlerin y\u00fcceltildi\u011fi maruf bir vak\u0131a olup, Mahkeme karar\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu mar\u015f\u0131n s\u00f6zlerine yer verilmemesi veya ter\u00f6r\u00fc ne \u015fekilde te\u015fvik etti\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gerekmemektedir. Somut olayda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ve onun s\u00f6zde liderinin sloganlarla \u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ter\u00f6ristler i\u00e7in sayg\u0131 duru\u015funda bulunuldu\u011fu nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yine PKK\u2019n\u0131n y\u0131llarca uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiddet ve ter\u00f6r kapasitesinin y\u00fcksekli\u011fi ve halen ter\u00f6r\u00fcn devam etti\u011fi olgusu da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, g\u00f6steride at\u0131lan slogan ve s\u00f6ylenen mar\u015f\u0131n ter\u00f6re ve \u015fiddete te\u015fvik eden, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc manevi olarak g\u00fc\u00e7lendiren bir mesaj\u0131n kamuoyu ile payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 niteli\u011fini haiz oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekir. Kald\u0131 ki, PKK\u2019n\u0131n insanl\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi, devletin PKK ve di\u011fer ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile m\u00fccadele etmesinin bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck oldu\u011fu nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmesinde devletin di\u011fer su\u00e7lara nazaran daha geni\u015f takdir hakk\u0131 mevcuttur. Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcnde, Ba\u015fvurucunun ve di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n slogan atma, sayg\u0131 duru\u015fu ve mar\u015fa i\u015ftirak edilmesi \u015feklindeki fillerine ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde yer verilmi\u015f olup, s\u00f6z konusu fiiller ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer i\u00e7in te\u015fvik edici olarak kabul edilmesi ve ter\u00f6r propagandas\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterlidir.<\/p>\n
Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi Kadri Pervane Ba\u015fvurusuna (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2015\/12115, Karar Tarihi: 8\/6\/2021 ve R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 30\/9\/2021 – 31614) ili\u015fkin verdi\u011fi kararda\u201c…48. Ter\u00f6rizmin propagandas\u0131, \u015fiddetin ge\u00e7erli ve etkili bir y\u00f6ntem oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcn toplum i\u00e7inde yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ter\u00f6r eylemlerine neden olan fikir ve kanaatlerin k\u00f6kle\u015fmesini sa\u011flamak amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131r ve bu amaca ula\u015fmak ancak belirli bir \u00e7aba ve zaman harcanmas\u0131 ile m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine a\u015fama a\u015fama \u00f6nce sempatizan, daha sonra destek\u00e7i ve \u00fcye olunmas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde propagandan\u0131n \u00f6nemli bir i\u015flevi vard\u0131r. \u00dcstelik ba\u015fvuruya konu PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc art\u0131k tehlikelili\u011fi bulunmayan veya tehlikelili\u011fi varsay\u0131msal bir \u00f6rg\u00fct de\u011fildir. PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olaylar\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fi tarihlerde ve h\u00e2len vahim \u015fiddet hareketlerinin planlay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 ve uygulay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131d\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla PKK toplum y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olduk\u00e7a yo\u011fun, ciddi ve somut bir tehlike arz etmektedir (Metin Birdal [GK], B. No: 2014\/15440, 22\/5\/2019, \u00a7 74). A.\u00d6. ise bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kurucusu ve uzun s\u00fcre y\u00f6neticisi olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn benimsedi\u011fi \u015fiddet y\u00f6ntemleri ile ismi \u00f6zde\u015fle\u015fmi\u015f bir ki\u015fidir\u202650. Bu kapsamda somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetinde Mahkemece de\u011ferlendirmeye al\u0131nan “Biji PKK, bu yola ba\u015fkoymu\u015fuz, liderimiz Apo bizim” \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zler, \u00f6zellikle polis raporlar\u0131nda \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yap\u0131lan par\u00e7adaki t\u00fcm s\u00f6zlerle birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Cezaland\u0131rmaya neden olan s\u00f6z konusu \u015fark\u0131 (bkz. \u00a7 7) bir b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00e2linde incelendi\u011finde \u2026 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n te\u015fvik edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Mar\u015fta sayg\u0131 duyulan, de\u011fer verilen semboller ve kavramlar kullan\u0131larak PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne hayranl\u0131k duyulmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r.\u201d \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7esi ile bir \u015fark\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 say\u0131labilece\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi yine Kadri Pervane karar\u0131nda \u201c..51\u2026Anayasa Mahkemesi, isimleri birer sembol h\u00e2line getirilmi\u015f olan PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc veya A.\u00d6.y\u00fc bu ba\u011flamda \u00f6vmek, desteklemek veya y\u00fcceltmek ile cebir, \u015fiddet veya tehdit i\u00e7eren y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik etmek aras\u0131nda bir mesafe olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatindedir. 52. Ba\u015fvurucu, bir halk otob\u00fcs\u00fc \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc olup otob\u00fcse binen say\u0131s\u0131z ki\u015finin s\u00f6z konusu \u015fark\u0131dan haberdar olmas\u0131na neden olmu\u015ftur. Bu yolla ba\u015fvurucu, toplumsal sorunlar\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde her t\u00fcr siyasal y\u00f6ntemi reddeden ve ter\u00f6r y\u00f6ntemlerini tek ve ge\u00e7erli bir y\u00f6ntem olarak benimseyen PKK, A.\u00d6. ve takip\u00e7ilerini \u00f6verek, ba\u015fkalar\u0131na benimsetmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak insanlar\u0131 cesaretlendirmeye, halk\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fcte olan sempatisini art\u0131rmaya ve giderek aktif deste\u011fini sa\u011flamaya olanak sa\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u202657.Yukar\u0131daki bilgiler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda -derece mahkemelerinin farkl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 dengelerken sahip olduklar\u0131 takdir pay\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde- ilk derece mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurucunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7elendirmek i\u00e7in sundu\u011fu nedenler bu t\u00fcr bir mahk\u00fbmiyeti hakl\u0131 g\u00f6stermek i\u00e7in ilgili ve yeterlidir\u2026.\u201d gerek\u00e7elerine yer vererek, Ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan 2 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015feklindeki m\u00fcdahalenin zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fi gibi orant\u0131l\u0131 da oldu\u011fu, m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut olay\u0131m\u0131zda da Ba\u015fvurucu\u2019nun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ve s\u00f6zde lideri lehine slogan att\u0131\u011f\u0131, sayg\u0131 duru\u015funda bulundu\u011fu ve ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile \u00f6zde\u015fle\u015fen Mar\u015fa e\u015flik etti\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda isimleri birer sembol h\u00e2line getirilmi\u015f olan PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc veya A.\u00d6.y\u00fc \u00f6vmek, desteklemek veya y\u00fcceltmek ile cebir, \u015fiddet veya tehdit i\u00e7eren y\u00f6ntemlere ba\u015fvurmay\u0131 te\u015fvik etmek aras\u0131nda bir mesafe olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Say\u0131n Mahkemenin Kadri Pervane i\u00e7tihad\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatindeyiz. Kald\u0131 ki, Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda hapis cezas\u0131 de\u011fil daha hafif bir yapt\u0131r\u0131m olan adli para cezas\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015f olup, s\u00f6z konusu ceza Ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fledi\u011fi fiil ile orant\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenlerle Ba\u015fvurucunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fi gibi orant\u0131l\u0131 da olup, m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatinde oldu\u011fumuzdan, Ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasan\u0131n 26. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi \u015feklindeki \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/21108 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MERVE NUR TEK\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21108) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Merve Nur TEK\u0130N Vekili : Av. Ahmet Yavuz YILMAZ \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir g\u00f6steride s\u00f6ylenen mar\u015fa e\u015flik etmesi ve slogan atmas\u0131 nedeniyle ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. 2014 y\u0131l\u0131 May\u0131s ay\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r’\u0131n Lice il\u00e7esinde, s\u0131n\u0131r b\u00f6lgelerindeki karakol in\u015faatlar\u0131n\u0131 protesto etmek amac\u0131yla eylemler yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; s\u00f6z konusu g\u00f6steriler esnas\u0131nda aralar\u0131nda kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin de oldu\u011fu \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015fi yaralanm\u0131\u015f, 7\/6\/2014 tarihinde R.B ve B.A. hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. 3. 10\/6\/2014 tarihinde kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re ayn\u0131 tarihte Ardahan \u00d6\u011frencileri Derne\u011finin Lice’de meydana gelen olaylar\u0131 protesto etmek amac\u0131yla organize etti\u011fi toplant\u0131ya, aralar\u0131nda Bar\u0131\u015f ve Demokrasi Partisi il te\u015fkilat\u0131na mensup \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n da oldu\u011fu yakla\u015f\u0131k y\u00fcz ki\u015fi kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Grup “Her Yer Lice Her Yer Direni\u015f” yazan bir afi\u015fle y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f yapm\u0131\u015f, gruptan bir ki\u015finin K\u00fcrt\u00e7e ” …davam\u0131z ve \u015fehitlerimiz an\u0131s\u0131na bir dakikal\u0131k sayg\u0131 duru\u015funa davet ediyorum.” \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zleri \u00fczerine sayg\u0131 duru\u015funda …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n