T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
AHMET BEKTA\u015e VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/33805)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 14\/5\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Ahmet BEKTA\u015e<\/p>\n
2. G\u00fcl TEPE<\/p>\n
3. Mustafa BEKTA\u015e<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Cem AKTA\u015e<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Sivas ili, Koyulhisar il\u00e7esi Sar\u0131harman k\u00f6y\u00fcnde bulunan bir arazinin m\u00fclkiyetine ili\u015fkin olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclen hukuk davas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 4\/8\/2014 tarihinde icra edilen ke\u015fif sonras\u0131nda davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131 ve onlar\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ba\u015flayan s\u00f6zl\u00fc tart\u0131\u015fma kavgaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
3. Ya\u015fanan olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015f, kal\u00e7a ve baca\u011f\u0131ndan yaralanan ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f, yak\u0131nlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Su\u015fehri Devlet Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. V\u00fccudunda kemik k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen ba\u015fvurucu bir \u00fcst sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumuna sevk edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Sivas Cumhuriyet \u00dcniversitesi Sa\u011fl\u0131k Hizmetleri Ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve Uygulama Hastanesince d\u00fczenlenen 4\/8\/2014 tarihli hasta yat\u0131\u015f formuna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun sol plato k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 (tip2) (diz ekleminde tibian\u0131n eklem y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc olu\u015fturan tibia kondillerinin k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131), sol iskion (kal\u00e7a kemi\u011finin alt ve arka k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan daha kuvvetli bir kemik) pubis k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131, sol sakrum (be\u015f sakral omurun kayna\u015fmas\u0131yla olu\u015fan b\u00fcy\u00fck, \u00fc\u00e7gen bir kemik k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131), sol illiak kanat (kendine has anatomiye sahip olan halka \u015feklinde yass\u0131 bir kemik) posterior k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131s\u0131 ile tedavisine ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun tedavisine daha sonra s\u0131ras\u0131yla \u015ei\u015fli Hamidiye Etfal E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesi ile Baltaliman\u0131 Kemik Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesinde devam edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Koyulhisar Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) olaya ili\u015fkin olarak resen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinde m\u00fc\u015fteki s\u0131fat\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu Mustafa Bekta\u015f ile A.A., A.B.A. ve H.D.nin, \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu G\u00fcl Tepe’nin ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; olaya tan\u0131k olan \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f, olay yerinde kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan incelemelerde bulunulmu\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f ile olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda yaralanan di\u011fer ki\u015filerin tedavi s\u00fcre\u00e7lerine ili\u015fkin belgeler getirtilerek dosyaya al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulan tan\u0131klar A.E., S.A. ve A.Y.,m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli A.A.n\u0131n olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda h\u0131zl\u0131 \u015fekilde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u00e7la ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’a bilin\u00e7li \u015fekilde \u00e7arparak ba\u015fvurucuyu yol kenar\u0131ndaki ah\u0131r duvar\u0131 ile ara\u00e7 aras\u0131nda s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131klar A.E. ve S.A. ayr\u0131ca m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli A.A.n\u0131n olay sonras\u0131nda, eylemde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131 \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde b\u0131rak\u0131p ba\u015fkas\u0131na ait ara\u00e7la yaral\u0131 olan e\u015fini de alarak olay yerinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu \u0130stanbul Anadolu Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce d\u00fczenlenen 15\/12\/2014 tarihli raporda s\u00f6z konusu yaralanman\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye sokmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak kemik k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun hayat fonksiyonlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r (4) derecede etkileyecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Soru\u015fturma neticesinde Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 16\/2\/2015 tarihli iddianamede A.A.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’a y\u00f6nelik eylemi nedeniyle neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan iddianamede A.A.n\u0131n arac\u0131n\u0131 silah olarak kullanarak ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r bi\u00e7imde yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucu Mustafa Bekta\u015f’\u0131n basit yaralama, tehdit ve hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan, di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucu G\u00fcl Tepe’nin hakaret su\u00e7undan ve A.A.n\u0131n di\u011fer ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi basit yaralama ve hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Koyulhisar Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclen yarg\u0131lama neticesinde kat\u0131lan san\u0131k A.A.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’a y\u00f6nelik olarak neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama eylemi nedeniyle 1 y\u0131l 13 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 9\/2\/2016 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu Mustafa Bekta\u015f’\u0131n hakaret, basit yaralama ve tehdit su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyetine, A.A.n\u0131n di\u011fer ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik eylemleri nedeniyle hakaret ve basit yaralama su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyetine, ba\u015fvurucu G\u00fcl Tepe’nin ise hakaret su\u00e7undan beraatine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi 26\/4\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu Mustafa Bekta\u015f hakk\u0131nda tehdit su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na, di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz taleplerinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’a y\u00f6nelik olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen eylem nedeniyle A.A. hakk\u0131nda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc bu suretle kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular, Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131 16\/6\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 14\/7\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f 13\/11\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu Mustafa Bekta\u015f’a isnat edilen tehdit su\u00e7u ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bozma sonras\u0131 yarg\u0131lama neticesinde 2\/11\/2021 tarihinde verilen d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131, aleyhe kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine 11\/12\/2021 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 olan di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular ba\u015fvuruyu Ahmet Bekta\u015f ad\u0131na da devam ettirmek istediklerini 1\/10\/2024 tarihinde bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f vefat etti\u011finden di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular bu ki\u015fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de bireysel ba\u015fvurunun taraf\u0131 h\u00e2line gelmi\u015fse de anlat\u0131m kolayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Ahmet Bekta\u015f ba\u015fvurucu olarak nitelendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Ya\u015fam Hakk\u0131n\u0131n Usul Boyutu Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fi \u0130ddias\u0131 <\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f, kendisine y\u00f6nelik kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs fiilinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde kasten yaralama olarak nitelendirilmesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n, uzun s\u00fcren ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak bir\u00e7ok infaz kanunu indiriminden yararlanan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n ceza infaz kurumunda infaz edilememesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
18. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ilk olarak ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi hususuna dikkat \u00e7ekilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ayr\u0131ca Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc, a\u011f\u0131r yaralamaya neden olan eylem hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi ve su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda hata edilerek kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
20. \u00d6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi baz\u0131 h\u00e2llerde de ba\u015fvuru; ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn derecesi ile t\u00fcr\u00fc, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131nda yatan niyet ve ama\u00e7 ile maruz kal\u0131nan eylemin ma\u011fdurun fiziki b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczerindeki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 gibi hususlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilir (Mehmet Karada\u011f [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/2030, 26\/6\/2014, \u00a7 20; Mustafa \u00c7elik ve Siyahmet \u015eeran [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/7227, 12\/1\/2017, \u00a7 69; Yasin A\u011fca [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/13163, 11\/5\/2017, \u00a7 110).<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun somut olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme bi\u00e7imi, ba\u015fvurucunun v\u00fccudunda meydana gelen \u00e7oklu k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131n hayati fonksiyonlara etkisinin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin eyleminin potansiyel olarak \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc nitelikte olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
23. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda devlet, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in olu\u015fturulan yasal ve idari \u00e7er\u00e7evenin gere\u011fi gibi uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hakka y\u00f6nelik ihlallerin durdurulup cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak etkili bir yarg\u0131sal sistem kurmakla da y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheli her \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 97).<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6l\u00fcme kasten neden olunmas\u0131 veya \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu meydana gelmesi h\u00e2linde etkili yarg\u0131sal sistem kurma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Asya G\u00f6res ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2018\/15851, 1\/12\/2022, \u00a7 74). Bu t\u00fcr soru\u015fturman\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n resen harekete ge\u00e7erek \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri tespit etmesi, soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, soru\u015fturman\u0131n veya sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131 ve me\u015fru menfaatlerini korumak i\u00e7in \u00f6len ki\u015finin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine gerekli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kat\u0131labilmesi gerekir (Salih Akku\u015f [1. B.], B. No: 2012\/1017, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 30;Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 99). Bununla birlikte etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir sonu\u00e7 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de\u011fil uygun ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi ba\u015fvuruculara \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle yarg\u0131latma ya da cezaland\u0131rma hakk\u0131 vermedi\u011fi gibi devlete t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyetle sonu\u00e7land\u0131rma \u00f6devi de y\u00fcklemez (Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 98).<\/p>\n
25. Olas\u0131 cezai sorumlulu\u011fun tespiti ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonras\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f ise bu a\u015fama da Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gereklerine cevap verebilecek nitelikte olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Filiz Aka [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/8365, 10\/6\/2015, \u00a7 30; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 100).<\/p>\n
26. Bireylerin cezai sorumlulu\u011funa ili\u015fkin hukuki sorunlar\u0131 incelemek, bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u015f\u00fcpheli ya da san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan ki\u015filerin su\u00e7lu veya su\u00e7suz oldu\u011funa karar vermek ya da s\u00f6z konusu yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7te san\u0131klara verilen cezalar\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7 76; Umut Tama\u00e7 [2. B.], B. No: 2014\/13514, 18\/7\/2018, \u00a7 98). Anayasa Mahkemesinin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131yla ilgili bir ba\u015fvuruda inceledi\u011fi husus, devletin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi kapsam\u0131ndaki sorumlulu\u011fudur (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 96; Aysel Gezer ve di\u011ferleri [2. B.], B. No: 2021\/9961, 2\/11\/2023, \u00a7 147). Bu nedenle Anayasa Mahkemesinden san\u0131klara isnat edilen eylemlerin vas\u0131fland\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 yapmas\u0131 beklenmemelidir.<\/p>\n
27. Somut olayda, olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinden hemen sonra soru\u015fturma mercileri taraf\u0131ndan resen harekete ge\u00e7ilerek soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bu kapsamda olay yerinde gerekli inceleme ve tespitler yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu ve m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli A.A. ile kavgaya d\u00e2hil olan ki\u015filer ve tan\u0131klar tespit edilerek beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun tedavi evrak\u0131 ile adli raporlar\u0131 temin edilmi\u015f ve m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli A.A. hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik eylemi nedeniyle neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131lama neticesinde Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucuyu yaralayan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 1 y\u0131l 13 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131n\u0131n olaydan haberdar olur olmaz, resen harekete ge\u00e7erek yaralama olay\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri tespit etmedi\u011fine ve soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine gerekli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kat\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir iddias\u0131 yoktur. Ba\u015fvuruya konu soru\u015fturmada an\u0131lan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de bir eksiklik tespit edilememi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n etkili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gereken tek mesele, ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrat ve \u00f6zenle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fidir.<\/p>\n
28. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tespit ba\u015fvuruya konu olay\u0131n kendi ko\u015fullar\u0131na, soru\u015fturmadaki \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131na, su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n niteli\u011fine, olay\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k derecesine ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n ilerlemesine engel olan unsurlar ya da g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcklerin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re farkl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6sterebilir (Fahriye Erkek ve di\u011ferleri [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/4668, 16\/9\/2015, \u00a7 91).<\/p>\n
29. Olaylar\u0131n daha sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ayd\u0131nlat\u0131labilmesi, ki\u015filerin hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne olan ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlere ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi ya da kay\u0131ts\u0131z kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc verilmesinin engellenmesi ad\u0131na mahkemeler kovu\u015fturmalar\u0131 makul bir s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fctmelidir (Filiz Aka, \u00a7 29). Bu gereklilik ya\u015fanan gecikmelerin yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n etkilili\u011fi \u00fczerinde bir etki yarat\u0131p yaratmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 meselesinden tamamen ayr\u0131d\u0131r. Bu sebeple kovu\u015fturmada ya\u015fanan a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 gecikme tek ba\u015f\u0131na yarg\u0131laman\u0131n etkisizli\u011fine neden olabilir (Aysel Gezer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 142).<\/p>\n
30. Somut olayda kavga olay\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n tespitine yarayacak t\u00fcm deliller topland\u0131ktan sonra d\u00fczenlenen 16\/2\/2015 tarihli iddianamenin kabul\u00fcyle a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 Mahkemece y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bir y\u0131ldan daha az s\u00fcren yarg\u0131lama neticesinde Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’a y\u00f6nelik eylemi kasten yaralama olarak vas\u0131fland\u0131rarak 9\/2\/2016 tarihinde kat\u0131lan san\u0131k A.A.n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ne var ki an\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz kanun yolu a\u015famas\u0131nda 5 y\u0131ldan daha fazla bir s\u00fcre bekledikten sonra Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n 26\/4\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131 ile kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’a y\u00f6nelik kasten yaralama eylemiyle ilgili yarg\u0131lama 6 y\u0131l 8 ay\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n bir s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131labilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvuruya konu davan\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131k nitelikte olmamas\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun davan\u0131n uzamas\u0131na yol a\u00e7mamas\u0131, dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n temyiz incelemesi s\u00fcrecinde 5 y\u0131ldan fazla bir s\u00fcre hareketsiz kalmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yarg\u0131lamadaki hi\u00e7bir unsurun yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bu denli uzamas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kovu\u015fturma evresinde ya\u015fanan bu a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 gecikme nedeniyle yarg\u0131lanman\u0131n makul makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
32. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fi \u0130ddias\u0131<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucular Mustafa Bekta\u015f ve G\u00fcl Tepe, haklar\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
34. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Veysi Ado ([GK] B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede Anayasa Mahkemesi 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe g\u00f6re 9\/3\/2023 tarihi (bu tarih d\u00e2hil) itibar\u0131yla derdest olan, yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131 neticesine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
35. Somut ba\u015fvuruda an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik nedenleri incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
36. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f, ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hak ihlallerinin tespiti ile yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesinin yan\u0131nda 50.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
37. Somut olayda ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ihlal edildi\u011fine ve bu ihlalin yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrede y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclerek sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ilkesine riayet edilmemesinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu davan\u0131n sona ermi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc nedeniyle yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
38. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edilmesi nedeniyle yaln\u0131zca ihlal tespitiyle giderilemeyecek olan manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 olan di\u011fer ba\u015fvuruculara net 50.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftereken \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 olan di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular G\u00fcl Tepe ve Mustafa Bekta\u015f’a net 50.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487.60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f’\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131 olan di\u011fer ba\u015fvurucular G\u00fcl Tepe ve Mustafa Bekta\u015f’a M\u00dc\u015eTEREKEN \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in Koyulhisar Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2015\/24, K.2016\/38) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 14\/5\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 14\/5\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/33805 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR AHMET BEKTA\u015e VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/33805) Karar Tarihi: 14\/5\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Raport\u00f6r : Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Ahmet BEKTA\u015e 2. G\u00fcl TEPE 3. Mustafa BEKTA\u015e Vekili : Av. Cem AKTA\u015e I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Sivas ili, Koyulhisar il\u00e7esi Sar\u0131harman k\u00f6y\u00fcnde bulunan bir arazinin m\u00fclkiyetine ili\u015fkin olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclen hukuk davas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 4\/8\/2014 tarihinde icra edilen ke\u015fif sonras\u0131nda davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131 ve onlar\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ba\u015flayan s\u00f6zl\u00fc tart\u0131\u015fma kavgaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 3. Ya\u015fanan olaylar s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015f, kal\u00e7a ve baca\u011f\u0131ndan yaralanan ba\u015fvurucu Ahmet Bekta\u015f, yak\u0131nlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Su\u015fehri Devlet Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. V\u00fccudunda kemik k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen ba\u015fvurucu bir \u00fcst sa\u011fl\u0131k kurumuna sevk edilmi\u015ftir. 4. Sivas Cumhuriyet \u00dcniversitesi Sa\u011fl\u0131k Hizmetleri Ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve Uygulama Hastanesince d\u00fczenlenen 4\/8\/2014 tarihli hasta yat\u0131\u015f formuna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun sol plato k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 (tip2) (diz ekleminde tibian\u0131n eklem y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc olu\u015fturan tibia kondillerinin k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131), sol iskion (kal\u00e7a kemi\u011finin alt ve arka k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan daha kuvvetli bir kemik) pubis k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131, sol sakrum (be\u015f …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n