T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
N.K.A.A. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/12862)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 14\/5\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
N.K.A.A.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. B\u00fc\u015fra AK<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 etme karar\u0131 nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 ile aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 etme karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada baz\u0131 usul g\u00fcvencelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 10\/2\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formlar\u0131 ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ula\u015f\u0131lan bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu 1988 do\u011fumlu bir erkek olup Irak Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, DAE\u015e silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn eylem ve faaliyetlerinin de\u015fifre edilmesine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ili\u015fkin olarak Nev\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; adli i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan gerekli idari i\u015flemlerin tesis edilmesi i\u00e7in Nev\u015fehir \u0130l G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne teslim edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Nev\u015fehir Valili\u011fi (Valilik) 12\/11\/2020 tarihinde 4\/4\/2013 tarihli ve 6458 say\u0131l\u0131 Yabanc\u0131lar ve Uluslararas\u0131 Koruma Kanunu\u2019nun 54. maddesinin bir numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) ve (d) bentleri uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesine ve bu maksatla idari g\u00f6zetim alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 etme karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle Kayseri 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde; s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 etme i\u015flemine gerek\u00e7e olarak g\u00f6sterilen silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7lamas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini, kamu d\u00fczeni ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fini ihlal edecek bir \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubiyeti ve eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, DAE\u015e ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile mezhebi nedeniyle Ha\u015fdi \u015eabi ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn tehdidi alt\u0131nda oldu\u011funu, \u00fclkesine g\u00f6nderilmesi durumunda \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclece\u011fini veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re ailesi ile T\u00fcrkiye’de ya\u015famas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi h\u00e2linde aile b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de bozulacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. \u0130dare Mahkemesi 31\/12\/2021 tarihinde davan\u0131n kesin olarak reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir :<\/p>\n
“Daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan, davac\u0131n\u0131n DEA\u015e silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile irtibatl\u0131 olabilece\u011finin de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi ve nitekim davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda konulan G-87 kodunun iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n da reddine karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, yabanc\u0131 \u00fclke vatanda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesini veya \u00fclkeye giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren durumlar\u0131n mutlaka su\u00e7 niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 ve bunun yarg\u0131 karar\u0131yla belirlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011funun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, DEA\u015e silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen eylemler ve \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn yap\u0131s\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yak\u0131n oldu\u011fu konusunda \u015f\u00fcphe bulunan bir ki\u015finin \u00fclkemizde kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fclke g\u00fcvenli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tehlike olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi, emniyet birimlerinin inceleme ve ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131na dayal\u0131 bilgilerin \u00fclke g\u00fcvenli\u011fini ilgilendiren konularda b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem arz etti\u011fi ve devletlerin egemenlik haklar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yabanc\u0131 \u00fclke vatanda\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fclkeye kabul\u00fc hususunda geni\u015f takdir yetkisi oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011finden davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda devletin h\u00fck\u00fcmranl\u0131k yetkisi dahilinde tesis edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan dava konusu s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015fleminde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 28\/1\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra s\u00fcresinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 12\/3\/2025 tarihli cevabi yaz\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu 3\/3\/2022 tarihinde Irak’a s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi 18\/3\/2025 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucunun avukat\u0131 B.A.dan ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00fcncel durumuna ili\u015fkin bilgi ve belgeler ile buna ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131 on be\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde sunmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin yaz\u0131s\u0131 25\/3\/2025 tarihinde Av. B\u00fc\u015fra Ak’a tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f ise de Av. B\u00fc\u015fra Ak yaz\u0131ya cevap vermemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
13. \u0130lgili hukuk i\u00e7in bkz. Mehmet Girasun ve \u00d6mer El\u00e7i [G.K.], B. No: 2015\/15266,17\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 22-26.<\/p>\n
14. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi (A\u0130HM) ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n avukatlar\u0131yla ileti\u015fimlerinin kesilmesini Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) 37. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ba\u015fvurunun d\u00fc\u015fmesi i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00f6rmektedir (bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. V.M. ve di\u011ferleri\/Bel\u00e7ika [BD], B. No: 60125\/11, 17\/11\/2016; Vlatko Sajkoski\/Kuzey Makedonya, B. No: 5960\/19, 26\/8\/2021; Angelo Apetofia\/\u0130talya, B. No: 60154\/19, 21\/10\/2021 Shemsunur Emirova\/Ukrayna, B. No: 56428\/07, 19\/5\/2022; Darboe ve Camara\/\u0130talya, B. No: 5797\/17, 21\/7\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 95-98 ).A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvurucunun art\u0131k davas\u0131n\u0131 takip etme niyetinin kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131rken S\u00f6zle\u015fme ve protokolleri ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklara sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesine ili\u015fkin \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da her olayda de\u011ferlendirmekte; b\u00f6yle birdurum yoksa davay\u0131 kay\u0131ttan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmektedir.<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 14\/5\/2025tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Adli Yard\u0131m Talebi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar Mehmet \u015eerif Ay ([2. B.], B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 23) karar\u0131nda, yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n adli yard\u0131m talepleri konusunda benimsenen ilkeler ise Nadali Agheli Kohne Shari ([1. B.], B. No: 2014\/12633, 9\/9\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 17, 18) karar\u0131nda yer almaktad\u0131r. An\u0131lan ilkelere g\u00f6re adli yard\u0131m i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar mevcutsa kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k \u015fart\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmese bile yabanc\u0131n\u0131n adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilmelidir. Somut ba\u015fvuruda yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu, DAE\u015e\u2019in ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 yeri i\u015fgal etmesi \u00fczerine ailesiyle birlikte T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; geri d\u00f6nmesi h\u00e2linde S\u00fcnni oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in Irak h\u00fck\u00fcmetiyle birlikte hareket eden \u015eii yanl\u0131s\u0131 Ha\u015fdi \u015eabi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclme ya da k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalma riski bulundu\u011funu, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi h\u00e2linde aile b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn de bozulaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ya\u015fam hakk\u0131, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilece\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca, \u0130dare Mahkemesinin s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi h\u00e2linde kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fabilece\u011fi riskleri de\u011ferlendirmedi\u011fini ve tahdit koduna ili\u015fkin iptal davas\u0131n\u0131 beklemeden karar verdi\u011fini belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n da ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re, pandemi ko\u015fullar\u0131 alt\u0131nda \u00fclkesine ya da \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir \u00fclkeye s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi, ya\u015fam\u0131 ile maddi ve manevi b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ciddi bir tehdit olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde mevzuata ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na yer verilerek ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011fu, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015fleminin etkin yarg\u0131 denetiminden ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun haks\u0131z ve hukuki dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurusunun reddi gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
a. Genel \u0130lkeler<\/p>\n
19. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un “Bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 ve incelenmesi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 48. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131 ve incelemesinin usul ve esaslar\u0131 ile ilgili di\u011fer hususlar \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fckle d\u00fczenlenir.”<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) “D\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 80. maddesinin (1) ve (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) B\u00f6l\u00fcmler ya da komisyonlarca yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki hallerde d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilebilir:<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
b) Ba\u015fvurucunun davas\u0131n\u0131 takipsiz b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u00e7) B\u00f6l\u00fcmler ya da Komisyonlarca saptanan herhangi bir ba\u015fka gerek\u00e7eden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc, ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan bir neden g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesi.<\/p>\n
(2) B\u00f6l\u00fcmler ya da Komisyonlar; yukar\u0131daki f\u0131krada belirtilen nitelikteki bir ba\u015fvuruyu, Anayasan\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 ve yorumlanmas\u0131 veya temel haklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ya da insan haklar\u0131na sayg\u0131n\u0131n gerekli k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde incelemeye devam edebilir.”<\/p>\n
21. \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn “D\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 59. maddesinin(5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(5) Ba\u015fvuru formunda belirtilen bilgilerde ve ba\u015fvuruyla ilgili ko\u015fullarda herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik oldu\u011funda bunun Mahkemeye bildirilmesi zorunludur. “<\/p>\n
22. Anayasa Mahkemesinin bireysel ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyebilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmalar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesinin sonraki a\u015famalar\u0131nda da ba\u015fvuruyu devam ettirme iradelerinin bulunmas\u0131 ve bu iradeyi Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6stermeleri gerekir. Bu bak\u0131mdan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 takip etmek i\u00e7in gerekli \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermi\u015f olmalar\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r (Mehmet Girasun ve \u00d6mer El\u00e7i, \u00a7 40). Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi s\u00fcrecinde \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 59. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011fe a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak vuku bulan, s\u00f6z konusu de\u011ferlendirmeyi etkileyecek nitelikte olan yeni ve \u00f6nemli geli\u015fmeler, ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 takiben geli\u015fen olay, idari veya yarg\u0131sal karar hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesinin bilgilendirilmemesi ba\u015fvurular\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetinin bir g\u00f6stergesi olabilece\u011fi gibi ayn\u0131 zamanda bireysel ba\u015fvuruyu takip etmeme iradelerinin de bir g\u00f6stergesi olarak de\u011ferlendirilebilir (Mehmet Girasun ve \u00d6mer El\u00e7i, \u00a7 41).<\/p>\n
23. Di\u011fer taraftan ba\u015fvurucular (veya temsilcileri) Anayasa Mahkemesi ile olan ileti\u015fimine de \u00f6zen g\u00f6stermelidir. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesiyle ileti\u015fiminde zorluklar \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131, ba\u015fvuruculara ula\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 (ula\u015f\u0131labilir bir adresin veya ileti\u015fim kanal\u0131 bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu durumun Anayasa Mahkemesine bildirilmemesi, adres de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin bildirilmemesi gibi) ba\u015fvurucularla yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sekteye u\u011fratabilecektir. Bu durum Anayasa Mahkemesini ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesine devam edilmesi konusunda bir ilgi kayb\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine sevk edebilir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvuruda kendilerini temsil eden avukatla ba\u015fvurunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi s\u00fcreci boyunca irtibat\u0131n\u0131 korumas\u0131 da \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n avukatlar\u0131yla irtibatlar\u0131n\u0131 koparmas\u0131, aralar\u0131ndaki bilgi ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n kesilmesine ve avukata ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcrecinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilecek hukuki sorunlara ili\u015fkin talimat verememeye sebep olaca\u011f\u0131ndan bu durum ba\u015fvurunun anlaml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclememesine yol a\u00e7abilecektir (Mehmet Girasun ve \u00d6mer El\u00e7i, \u00a7 43).<\/p>\n
b. \u0130lkelerin Olaya Uygulanmas\u0131<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu, hakk\u0131nda verilen s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Av. B\u00fc\u015fra Ak arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 10\/2\/2022 tarihinde Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015f ve s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015fleminin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemeye y\u00f6nelik tedbir talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Anayasa Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun tedbir talebini reddetmi\u015f, akabinde ba\u015fvurucu 3\/3\/2022 tarihinde Irak’a s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 11). Aradan ge\u00e7en \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrede ba\u015fvurucunun vekili, ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sonras\u0131ndaki g\u00fcncel durumu hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir bilgi veya belge sunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince 18\/3\/2025 tarihinde vekile yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131k talebe ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucu vekili cevap vermemi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 12). Av. B\u00fc\u015fra Ak’\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcrecinde s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi konusunda Anayasa Mahkemesini bilgilendirmemesi ve ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00fcncel durumuna ili\u015fkinbilgi talebine kar\u015f\u0131 sessiz kalmas\u0131 m\u00fcvekkili olan ba\u015fvurucuyla ileti\u015fiminin koptu\u011funu g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun temsilcisiyle ileti\u015fiminin kesilmesi, ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvurusunu s\u00fcrd\u00fcrme iradesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun Irak’a g\u00f6nderildikten sonraki durumu hakk\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulmu\u015f herhangi bir bilgi ya da belge yoktur. Bu sebeple Anayasa Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edildi\u011fi Irak’ta k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frama konusunda ger\u00e7ek bir riskle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kal\u0131p kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda de\u011ferlendirme yapabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131ndan da yoksundur.<\/p>\n
25. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, ba\u015fvurucunun ba\u015fvurusunu takipsiz b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesine devam etmeyi gerekli k\u0131lan ba\u015fka bir hakl\u0131 neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. \u00d6te yandan \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’\u00fcn 80. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ba\u015fvurunun incelenmesinin devam\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 veya temel haklar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n ve s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi ya da insan haklar\u0131na sayg\u0131n\u0131n gerekli k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 herhangi bir durumun da s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurunun takipsiz b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve incelenmesinin s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan bir sebep g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle D\u00dc\u015eMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 14\/5\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLEkarar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 14\/5\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/12862 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR N.K.A.A. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/12862) Karar Tarihi: 14\/5\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Raport\u00f6r : Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucu : N.K.A.A. Vekili : Av. B\u00fc\u015fra AK I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 etme karar\u0131 nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 ile aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 etme karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada baz\u0131 usul g\u00fcvencelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 10\/2\/2022 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formlar\u0131 ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ula\u015f\u0131lan bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Ba\u015fvurucu 1988 do\u011fumlu bir erkek olup Irak Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. 6. Ba\u015fvurucu, DAE\u015e silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn eylem ve faaliyetlerinin de\u015fifre edilmesine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ili\u015fkin olarak Nev\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; adli i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152894","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n