T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
B.Y. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/29400)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Kemal \u00d6ZEREN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
B.Y.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mehmet \u00d6ZTOPRAK<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, pilot olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00fcresini tamamlayarak T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinden (TSK) istifa eden ba\u015fvurucunun 15 Temmuz darbe giri\u015fimi sonras\u0131nda g\u00f6revine geri \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u00dclkemizin 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7, Mill\u00ee G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu kararlar\u0131, darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn bast\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n akabinde Bakanlar Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde ilan edilen ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) s\u00fcreci ve bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te uygulanan tedbirler Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde yer almaktad\u0131r (Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 12-66; Sel\u00e7uk \u00d6zdemir [GK], B. No: 2016\/49158, 26\/7\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 20, 21; Alparslan Altan [GK], B. No: 2016\/15586, 11\/1\/2018, \u00a7 10; ayr\u0131ca bkz. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26\/9\/2017 tarihli ve E.2017\/16.MD-956, K.2017\/370 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131).<\/p>\n
3. OHAL s\u00fcrecinde genel ve soyut normlar ihdas edilerek al\u0131nan tedbirlerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda do\u011frudan etki do\u011furucu nitelikte i\u015flemler de tesis edilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda 25\/8\/2017 tarihli ve 30165 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 694 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin (694 say\u0131l\u0131 OHAL KHK’s\u0131) 37. maddesiyle TSK’dan ayr\u0131lan pilot subaylar\u0131n u\u00e7u\u015f i\u00e7in gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131 sa\u011flamalar\u0131 ve haklar\u0131nda yapt\u0131r\u0131lacak g\u00fcvenlik soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n\u0131n olumlu olmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yla ihtiya\u00e7 duyulan hava arac\u0131 tiplerinde on sekiz y\u0131ll\u0131k y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00fcresini tamamlamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden subay nasbedileceklerine y\u00f6nelik bir kural getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, TSK b\u00fcnyesinde pilot olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken zorunlu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00fcresini doldurmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcteakip 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda g\u00f6revinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 15 Temmuz darbe giri\u015fiminin sonras\u0131nda kabul edilen 694 say\u0131l\u0131 OHAL KHK’s\u0131n\u0131n 37. maddesiyle 27\/7\/1967 tarihli ve 926 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Sil\u00e2hl\u0131 Kuvvetleri Personel Kanunu’na eklenen ek ge\u00e7ici 98. madde ile TSK’dan ayr\u0131lan pilot subaylar\u0131n y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00fcreleri on sekiz y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve bu kapsamdaki pilotlar kamu g\u00f6revlerine geri \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 25\/8\/2017 tarihli Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren s\u00f6z konusu OHAL d\u00fczenlemesi 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7078 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 D\u00fczenlemeler Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin De\u011fi\u015ftirilerek Kabul Edilmesine Dair Kanun’un 35. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu yeniden muvazzaf subay olarak g\u00f6revlendirilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptaline ve tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi talebiyle Ankara 9. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde; 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k on be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k hizmetini ve zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlad\u0131ktan sonra g\u00f6revinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten ba\u015fvurucu zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresini art\u0131ran ve geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck \u015fekilde uygulanan d\u00fczenlemenin sivil havac\u0131l\u0131kta devam eden mesleki kariyerini ve beklentilerini olumsuz \u015fekilde etkiledi\u011fini, kendisini ve ailesini ma\u011fdur etti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130dare Mahkemesi; ba\u015fvurucunun y\u00fcksek tecr\u00fcbeye sahip pilot olarak hizmetine ihtiya\u00e7 duyuldu\u011funu vurgulayarak on sekiz y\u0131ll\u0131k zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlamak \u00fczere yeniden muvazzaf subay olarak g\u00f6revlendirilmesine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemde hukuka, kamu yarar\u0131 ve hizmet gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 22\/10\/2019 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusu Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 1. \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin 18\/6\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n usule ve hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 18\/9\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra ayn\u0131 tarihte bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresini tamamlad\u0131ktan sonra TSK’daki g\u00f6revinden ayr\u0131larak sivil havac\u0131l\u0131k alan\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6reve geri d\u00f6nmesiyle birlikte maddi anlamda ciddi kay\u0131plar ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun sosyal hayat\u0131n\u0131 da olumsuz \u015fekilde etkiledi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucu adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, haberle\u015fme ve seyahat h\u00fcrriyetinin, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyetinin, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; somut olayla ilgili olarak Anayasa, ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak incelemede bunlar\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6nceki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 tekrar etmi\u015f olmakla birlikte OHAL d\u00f6neminin bitti\u011fini fakat son tahlilde zorunlu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresinin yirmi bir y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen i\u015flem, \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n otomatik olarak uygulanabilirli\u011fini sa\u011flamamakla birlikte m\u00fcdahalenin ba\u015fvurucunun mesleki faaliyetlerinin aksamas\u0131na, kariyer planlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fmesine, sosyal \u00e7evresiyle olan ili\u015fkilerine \u00f6nemli derecede etki etti\u011fi ve bu etkinin belirli bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k d\u00fczeyine ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finden ba\u015fvuru \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanabilir bulunmu\u015f ve bu kapsamda incelenmi\u015ftir (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6nde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Erdal Erbayram [1. B.], B. No: 2019\/25121, 7\/6\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 22, 23).<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olan i\u015flem, t\u00fcm \u00fclkede ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2lin devam etti\u011fi bir s\u00fcre\u00e7te tesis edilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleriyle irtibatl\u0131 ya da iltisakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen pilot subaylar\u0131n TSK’dan uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan personel a\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesine y\u00f6nelik al\u0131nan tedbirlerden biri oldu\u011fu, bu durumun ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2lin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 tehlikeleri bertaraf etmek amac\u0131na y\u00f6neldi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fine dair inceleme Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r (Engin Karata\u015f [2. B.], B. No: 2018\/3488, 13\/9\/2022; Erdal Erbayram, \u00a7 24; Onur \u00c7al\u0131\u015fkan ve di\u011ferleri [1. B.], B. No: 2019\/2744, 5\/9\/2023, \u00a7 11).<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak inceleme; m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’daki \u00e7ekirdek haklarla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, an\u0131lan maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda say\u0131lan hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere dokunup dokunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, milletleraras\u0131 hukuktan do\u011fan y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklere ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil edip etmedi\u011fi ve durumun gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitiyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r (Ayla Demir \u0130\u015fat [GK], B. No: 2018\/24245, 8\/10\/2020, \u00a7 146; Erdal Erbayram, \u00a7 26; Onur \u00c7al\u0131\u015fkan ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 13).<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi somut ba\u015fvuru konusunu Erdal Erbayram karar\u0131nda Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda inceleyerek \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu kararda; \u00fclke savunmas\u0131n\u0131n zafiyete u\u011framamas\u0131 ve mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fin temini a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan TSK b\u00fcnyesinde g\u00f6rev yapan pilot subaylar\u0131n yeterli say\u0131da ve donan\u0131mda olmalar\u0131n\u0131n vazge\u00e7ilmez gerekliliklerden biri oldu\u011fu, acil ihtiyac\u0131n h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde giderilebilmesinin zaman alabilece\u011fi, mevcut kaynaklar\u0131n ya da s\u0131n\u0131f de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi suretiyle elde edilen kayna\u011f\u0131n yetersiz kalabilece\u011fi gibi gerek\u00e7elerle eski personelin g\u00f6reve geri \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015feklinde belirlenen arac\u0131n amac\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tedbirin keyf\u00ee olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununa birlikte g\u00f6revlerine d\u00f6nen pilot subaylara tan\u0131nan mali imk\u00e2nlar\u0131n iyile\u015ftirilmesine ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemeleri de g\u00f6zeterek ki\u015filerin \u00fcstlenece\u011fi k\u00fclfetlerin azalt\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan iyile\u015ftirmelerle kapsamdaki ki\u015filerin \u00fcstlenece\u011fi k\u00fclfetlerin azalt\u0131lmas\u0131 yolunda ad\u0131mlar at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na, \u00fclke savunmas\u0131 ve mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fin temin edilmesi konusunda olu\u015fan acil ihtiya\u00e7 nedeniyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan kamu yarar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda g\u00f6revine geri \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lan ve bir s\u00fcre daha zorunlu hizmet s\u00fcresine tabi tutulan pilotlar\u0131n a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 k\u00fclfet alt\u0131na sokulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve tedbirin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmelerde bulunulmu\u015ftur. Neticede kamunun menfaati ile g\u00f6revlerine geri \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lan pilotlar\u0131n ki\u015fisel menfaatleri aras\u0131nda kurulmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan dengenin adil oldu\u011fu, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen g\u00fcvencelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmayan tedbirlerin ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc y\u00f6netim usullerinin uygulanmas\u0131na neden olan durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz oldu\u011funun s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Erdal Erbayram, \u00a7\u00a7 35-41; Onur \u00c7al\u0131\u015fkan ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 17; G\u00fcnay \u00d6zcan [2. B.], B. No: 2020\/22028, 27\/11\/2024,\u00a7\u00a7 16, 17).<\/p>\n
15. Somut ba\u015fvuruda da Anayasa Mahkemesinin Erdal Erbayram karar\u0131nda ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na etki eden tedbirin OHAL d\u00f6neminde temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesindeki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere uygun oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 15\/4\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/4\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/29400 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR B.Y. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/29400) Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Kemal \u00d6ZEREN Ba\u015fvurucu : B.Y. Vekili : Av. Mehmet \u00d6ZTOPRAK I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, pilot olarak g\u00f6rev yapmaktayken y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck s\u00fcresini tamamlayarak T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinden (TSK) istifa eden ba\u015fvurucunun 15 Temmuz darbe giri\u015fimi sonras\u0131nda g\u00f6revine geri \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u00dclkemizin 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7, Mill\u00ee G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu kararlar\u0131, darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn bast\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n akabinde Bakanlar Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan \u00fclke genelinde ilan edilen ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) s\u00fcreci ve bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te uygulanan tedbirler Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde yer almaktad\u0131r (Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 12-66; Sel\u00e7uk \u00d6zdemir [GK], B. No: 2016\/49158, 26\/7\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 20, 21; Alparslan Altan [GK], B. No: 2016\/15586, 11\/1\/2018, \u00a7 10; ayr\u0131ca bkz. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 26\/9\/2017 tarihli ve E.2017\/16.MD-956, K.2017\/370 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131). 3. OHAL s\u00fcrecinde genel ve soyut normlar ihdas edilerek al\u0131nan tedbirlerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda do\u011frudan etki do\u011furucu nitelikte i\u015flemler de tesis edilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda 25\/8\/2017 tarihli ve …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n