T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
H.G.T. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23070)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Fatih ALKAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
H.G.T.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mehmet \u0130PEK<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, psikolojk tacize maruz kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle \u00f6zel bir \u015firkette finans uzman yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f ve 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda ayn\u0131 \u015firket b\u00fcnyesindeki e\u011fitim birimine atanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 birime 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 \u015eubat ay\u0131nda m\u00fcd\u00fcr olarak atanan B.V. taraf\u0131ndan sistematik olarak psikolojik tacize u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 30\/3\/2016 tarihinde \u015firketin idari i\u015fler m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcyle ve ilgili y\u00f6neticileriyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f, akabinde 31\/3\/2016 tarihinde i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsil edilmesi ve psikolojik taciz olu\u015fturan eylemlerden kaynaklanan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi amac\u0131yla \u0130stanbul 26. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesine (Mahkeme) 3\/6\/2016 tarihinde tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu dava dilek\u00e7esinde; mesai saatlerinde hassas ve \u00f6zverili \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, e\u011fitim programlar\u0131n\u0131n organizasyon s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve e\u011fitimlerde sunuculuk g\u00f6revini yerine getirdi\u011fini, sunuculu\u011funu \u00fcstlendi\u011fi bir programda aya\u011f\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine k\u0131rk g\u00fcn istirahat raporu d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te haber verilmeksizin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 birimin de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. E\u011fitim birimine yeniden g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fini, i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn birim m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc B.V. taraf\u0131ndan di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara oranla art\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisine ak\u015fam saatlerinde ve tedavi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00f6nemde k\u0131sa mesajlar g\u00f6nderildi\u011fini, di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde kendisini k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrecek s\u00f6zler sarf edildi\u011fini ve suni tart\u0131\u015fmalarla istifa etmeye zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini hakl\u0131 nedenle feshetti\u011fini ve maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar nedeniyle psikolojisinin bozuldu\u011funu belirterek manevi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmin edilmesini ve t\u00fcm i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n taraf\u0131na \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Daval\u0131 i\u015fveren vekili taraf\u0131ndan sunulan savunma dilek\u00e7esinde; psikolojik taciz uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n bir kurguya dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, ba\u015fvurucunun istifa ederek ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fi, g\u00f6rev tan\u0131m\u0131nda belirtilen i\u015fleri yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn art\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
5. Mahkeme, manevi tazminat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne 17\/7\/2018 tarihinde karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; daval\u0131 \u015firketteki y\u00f6neticilerin ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde psikolojik taciz boyutunda oldu\u011fu ve bu nedenle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcyle ba\u015fvurucu lehine 3.000 TL manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 26. Hukuk Dairesinin (B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi) 11\/2\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla Mahkemece verilen karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davan\u0131n reddine kesin \u015fekilde karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; ba\u015fvurucunun sistemli olarak psikolojik bask\u0131ya u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin somut ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delillerle ortaya konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n genel ve soyut ifadeler i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, bir k\u0131s\u0131m beyanlar\u0131n duyuma dayal\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve i\u015fyerinde ba\u015fvurucuya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin somut beyanlar\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucuya di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara g\u00f6re daha fazla i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc verildi\u011fi, g\u00f6rev tan\u0131m\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda i\u015fler yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131n\u0131n da somut \u015fekilde ortaya konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, psikolojik tacizin unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun ki\u015fisel haklar\u0131n\u0131n sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 8\/4\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f ve 4\/5\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Maddi ve Manevi Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Koruma ve Geli\u015ftirme Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 birime m\u00fcd\u00fcr olarak atanan B.V. taraf\u0131ndan y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara k\u0131yasla art\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 birimin habersiz \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini, doktor randevular\u0131na gitmesinin engellenmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, psikolojisinin bozuldu\u011funu ve manevi zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmin edilmesi talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde reddedildi\u011fini, verilen karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu, s\u00f6z konusu karar nedeniyle devletin pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerini yerine getirmedi\u011fini belirterek maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
10. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan sunulan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda; mevcut ba\u015fvuruda Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 sundu\u011fu beyan dilek\u00e7esinde, ba\u015fvuru formunda yer alan iddia ve taleplerini yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvuru, Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir (Mehmet Bayrakc\u0131 [1. B.], B. No: 2014\/8715, 5\/4\/2018, \u00a7 50; Ebru Bilgin [GK], B. No: 2014\/7998, 19\/7\/2018, \u00a7 70).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda, herkesin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu belirtilmekte olup s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenleme, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin 8. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan fiziksel ve zihinsel b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelmektedir (Sevim Akat E\u015fki [1. B.], B. No: 2013\/2187, 19\/12\/2013, \u00a7 30).<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi; bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda her somut olay\u0131n kendi b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirilmesi ko\u015fuluyla bireylerin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ortamlar\u0131nda maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri eylem, i\u015flem ya da ihmallerin psikolojik taciz derecesine ula\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in birtak\u0131m unsurlar\u0131n aranmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda Uluslararas\u0131 \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc (ILO) ile \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca haz\u0131rlanan yay\u0131n ve raporlar da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda muamelelerin psikolojik taciz olarak vas\u0131fland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in;<\/p>\n
i. \u0130\u015fyeri ile ilgili olarak i\u015fyerindeki y\u00f6neticiler ve\/veya di\u011fer \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi ya da bu t\u00fcr m\u00fcdahalelere g\u00f6z yumulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
ii. S\u00fcreklilik arz edecek \u015fekilde tekrarlanmas\u0131, keyf\u00eelik i\u00e7ermesi, sistemli ve kas\u0131tl\u0131 olmas\u0131, y\u0131ld\u0131rma ve d\u0131\u015flama amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131,<\/p>\n
iii. Ma\u011fdurun ki\u015fili\u011finde, mesleki durumunda veya sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda zarar ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131 ya da ciddi bir zarar tehlikesi i\u00e7ermesi gerekir (Mehmet Bayrakc\u0131, \u00a7 69; Ebru Bilgin, \u00a7 80; T\u00fcrkan Aydo\u011fmu\u015f [2. B.], B. No: 2018\/19000, 12\/1\/2022, \u00a7 27).<\/p>\n
14. Muamelelerin neden oldu\u011fu sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n boyutu ma\u011fdurun konumuna, muamelelerin s\u00fcresine, s\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, kim ya da kimler taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fine, ma\u011fdurun cinsiyetine, ya\u015f\u0131na ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumuna kadar bir\u00e7ok fakt\u00f6re g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015febilmektedir (Mehmet Bayrakc\u0131, \u00a7 70; Ebru Bilgin, \u00a7 81; T\u00fcrkan Aydo\u011fmu\u015f, \u00a7 28).<\/p>\n
15. Vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere ilgililerin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ortamlar\u0131nda maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri eylem, i\u015flem ya da ihmallerin psikolojik taciz derecesine ula\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ki\u015filiklerinde, mesleki durumlar\u0131nda veya sa\u011fl\u0131klar\u0131nda zarar ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131 ya da ciddi bir zarar tehlikesinin s\u00f6z konusu olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Her \u015feyden \u00f6nce s\u00f6z konusu eylem, i\u015flem ya da ihmallerin ilgililer i\u00e7in \u00e7ekilmez bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k ve yo\u011funluk derecesine ula\u015farak onlar\u0131n manevi b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fcklerini tehdit eder boyuta geldi\u011fi ortaya konulmal\u0131d\u0131r. Nitekim Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce somut ba\u015fvuruyla benzer nitelikteki ba\u015fvurularda bu ba\u011flamda de\u011ferlendirmeler yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. T\u00fcrkan Aydo\u011fmu\u015f, \u00a7\u00a7 35, 36).<\/p>\n
16. Somut ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen eylemlerin B.V.nin ba\u015fvurucunun \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 birime m\u00fcd\u00fcr olarak atand\u0131\u011f\u0131 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 \u015eubat ay\u0131 ile i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshedildi\u011fi 2016 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki d\u00f6nemde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi iddia edilmektedir. S\u00f6z konusu eylemlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialara y\u00f6nelik olarak B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan tespitler ile bahse konu s\u00fcrecin k\u0131sa bir d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu hususu birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucuya uygulanan eylem ve i\u015flemlerden kaynakl\u0131 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun ki\u015fili\u011finde, mesleki durumunda ya da sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f, \u00e7ekilmez bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k ve yo\u011funluk derecesine ula\u015fm\u0131\u015f bir hususun ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve iddialar\u0131n\u0131n soyut kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu anlamda ba\u015fvurucunun neden ve sonu\u00e7 iddias\u0131 aras\u0131nda kurdu\u011fu nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 objektif ve ikna edici \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
17. \u00d6zetle uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve psikolojik taciz oldu\u011fu iddia edilen eylem ve i\u015flemlerin ba\u015fvurucunun manevi b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc tehdit eder boyutta, \u00e7ekilmez bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k ve yo\u011funluk derecesine ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen kararda; ba\u015fvurucunun ve i\u015fverenin iddia ve savunmalar\u0131 ile sunulan deliller de\u011ferlendirilerek tazminat davas\u0131na konu edilen eylem ve i\u015flemlerin psikolojik taciz olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015fverenin tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n makul ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetildi\u011fi ve t\u00fcm bu hususlara dayan\u0131larak davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Neticede; somut olay\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerindeki etkilerinin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, verilen karar\u0131n bu y\u00f6nde ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7erdi\u011fi ve anayasal g\u00fcvencelerin korunmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin yerine getirildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Veysi Ado ([GK], B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede Anayasa Mahkemesi 9\/1\/2013 tarihli ve 6384 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine Yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Baz\u0131 Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat \u00d6denmek Suretiyle \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne Dair Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesinde 28\/3\/2023 tarihli ve 7445 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikle, 9\/3\/2023 tarihi itibar\u0131yla derdest olan yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131yla yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Tazminat Komisyonuna ba\u015fvuru yolu t\u00fcketilmeden incelenmesinin bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincil niteli\u011fi ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Somut ba\u015fvuruda da an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 15\/4\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/4\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/23070 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR H.G.T. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23070) Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Fatih ALKAN Ba\u015fvurucu : H.G.T. Vekili : Av. Mehmet \u0130PEK I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, psikolojk tacize maruz kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilmesi nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle de makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesiyle \u00f6zel bir \u015firkette finans uzman yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f ve 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda ayn\u0131 \u015firket b\u00fcnyesindeki e\u011fitim birimine atanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 birime 2015 y\u0131l\u0131 \u015eubat ay\u0131nda m\u00fcd\u00fcr olarak atanan B.V. taraf\u0131ndan sistematik olarak psikolojik tacize u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 30\/3\/2016 tarihinde \u015firketin idari i\u015fler m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcyle ve ilgili y\u00f6neticileriyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f, akabinde 31\/3\/2016 tarihinde i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshetmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsil edilmesi ve psikolojik taciz olu\u015fturan eylemlerden kaynaklanan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi amac\u0131yla \u0130stanbul 26. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesine (Mahkeme) 3\/6\/2016 tarihinde tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu dava dilek\u00e7esinde; mesai saatlerinde hassas ve \u00f6zverili \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, e\u011fitim programlar\u0131n\u0131n organizasyon s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve e\u011fitimlerde sunuculuk g\u00f6revini yerine getirdi\u011fini, sunuculu\u011funu \u00fcstlendi\u011fi bir programda aya\u011f\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n