{"id":136956,"date":"2025-07-02T18:01:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-02T15:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/"},"modified":"2025-07-02T18:01:00","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T15:01:00","slug":"mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/","title":{"rendered":"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun \u201c\u0130fade ve sorgu usul\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda yer alan 148. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen; \u201cM\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk\u00e7a al\u0131nan ifade, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc do\u011frultusunda m\u00fcdafiinin huzurunda al\u0131nmayan \u015f\u00fcphelinin kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015fayet mahkemenin \u00e7eli\u015fki g\u00f6rmesi halinde, bu \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi gidermek amac\u0131yla duru\u015fmada kolluk tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n okunup okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, CMK m.213 uyar\u0131nca bu duruma itiraz edilip edilebilece\u011fi, bu do\u011frultuda Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 13.12.2023 tarihli, 2021\/17836 E. ve 2023\/25607 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 alabilece\u011fi, hem CMK m.149\/1\u2019de \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda bir veya birden fazla m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fini ve hem de \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.6\/3-c\u2019de, bir su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin, kendisini bizzat savunmak veya se\u00e7ece\u011fi bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, e\u011fer avukat tutmak i\u00e7in gerekli maddi olanaklardan yoksun ise ve adaletin yerine gelmesi i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, re\u2019sen atanacak bir avukat\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00fccretsiz olarak yaralanabilme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu yasal d\u00fczenlemelerle ortaya koyulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Kanun, m\u00fcdafii yard\u0131m\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ifadelerin do\u011frulu\u011funa karine olarak \u015f\u00fcphe ile yakla\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr ifadeler, ancak hakim veya mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde tekrarlan\u0131rsa \u015f\u00fcphe ortadan kalkacakt\u0131r. Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelinin al\u0131nan ifadesi, \u015f\u00fcpheliye yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f te\u015fhis veya yer g\u00f6sterme i\u015flemi hukuka uygun olsa bile, m\u00fcdafii haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ifade veya yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f i\u015flem, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmam\u0131\u015fsa h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz[1].<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 13.12.2023 tarihli, 2021\/17836 E. ve 2023\/25607 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na g\u00f6re; \u201cSan\u0131\u011f\u0131n, doktor olan kat\u0131lana yerine getirdi\u011fi g\u00f6rev nedeniyle aleni say\u0131lan hastane koridorunda \u2018Hastama bakm\u0131yorsun, senin gibi doktor olmaz olsun, anan\u0131, avrad\u0131n\u0131, bac\u0131n\u0131, dinini, iman\u0131n\u0131 sinkaf edeyim, o… \u00e7ocu\u011fu doktor.\u2019 \u015feklinde s\u00f6zler s\u00f6yleyerek hakaret etti\u011fi iddia ve Yerel Mahkemece kabul olunmu\u015ftur. Vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz sebepleri ile sair y\u00f6nlerden yap\u0131lan incelemede ba\u015fkaca nedenler yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ancak; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 148\u2019inci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan \u2018M\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk\u00e7a al\u0131nan ifade, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz\u2019 ve ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 213\u2019nc\u00fc maddesinde yer alan \u2018Aralar\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmas\u0131 halinde; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar ile Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan veya m\u00fcdafiin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu kolluk ifadesine ili\u015fkin tutanaklar duru\u015fmada okunabilir.\u2019 \u015feklindeki yasal d\u00fczenlemelere g\u00f6re; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceki ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunmas\u0131n\u0131n ilk ko\u015fulunun iki ifade aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmas\u0131, ikinci ko\u015fulun ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceki ifadesinin; hakim, mahkeme ya da Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya kollukta al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 taktirde ise ifadeye m\u00fcdafiin kat\u0131lmas\u0131 oldu\u011fu, somut olayda her ne kadar san\u0131k kolluk beyan\u0131nda \u2018\u0130t o\u011flu it dedim.\u2019 seklinde s\u00f6yledi\u011fini tevili ikrar etmi\u015f ise de, bu ifadenin m\u00fcdafii huzurunda al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, duru\u015fmada da b\u00f6yle bir s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemedi\u011fini beyan etmesi nedeniyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafisiz kolluk ifadesinin d\u0131\u015flanmas\u0131 yerine h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lana \u2018\u2026dinini, iman\u0131n\u0131 sinkaf edeyim.\u2019 diyerek hakaret etmesi bi\u00e7imindeki eyleminin, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 125 inci maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendinde d\u00fczenlenen ki\u015finin mensup bulundu\u011fu dine g\u00f6re kutsal say\u0131lan de\u011ferlerden bahisle hakaret su\u00e7unu da olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, birden fazla nitelikli hal ihlaline neden olan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesindeki orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesi ve 61\u2019nci maddesindeki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler dikkate al\u0131narak, belirlenen temel cezada asgari hadden uzakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeyerek eksik ceza tayin edilmesi nedeniyle, karar hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u2026 A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir\u201d.<\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da yer verdi\u011fimiz Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131na konu olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fi, kolluk ifadesinin m\u00fcdafii huzurunda verilmedi\u011fi, su\u00e7 ikrar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ise sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi, yani su\u00e7lamay\u0131 reddetti\u011fi, bu nedenle mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan CMK m.213 uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma a\u015famalar\u0131nda ifade ve savunmalar\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okundu\u011fu, ancak kollukta al\u0131nan ifadenin \u015f\u00fcphelinin m\u00fcdafii haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu do\u011frultuda CMK m.148\/4 uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcdafiin haz\u0131r bulunmadan kolluk\u00e7a san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fbu karara kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda m\u00fcdafii yoklu\u011funda kollukta verilen beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Belirtmeliyiz ki; soru\u015fturma evresinde \u015f\u00fcphelinin m\u00fcdafii huzurunda al\u0131nmayan kolluk ifadesi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturma evresinde tam tersi y\u00f6nde beyana yer vermesi, yani soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131n do\u011frulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 reddetti\u011fi bir durumda, bu beyanlar dikkate al\u0131namayacak, okunamayacak ve kolluk ifadesi ile yarg\u0131lamada al\u0131nan savunma ile aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkinin bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle kolluk ifadesi okunmak suretiyle \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi yoluna da gidilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n

Nitekim benzer y\u00f6nde Yarg\u0131tay 7. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 10.04.2013 tarihli 2011\/1567 E. ve 2013\/10237 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; \u201cSan\u0131k …\u2019in temyizine gelince; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, haz\u0131rl\u0131kta verdi\u011fi savunmas\u0131na dayan\u0131lmak suretiyle mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc tesis edilmi\u015f ise de, san\u0131k … soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda m\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nan, 22.12.2006 tarihli kolluk ifadesinde, karde\u015fi olan san\u0131k …\u2019in seyyar tezgahta sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ele ge\u00e7irilen davaya konu e\u015fyan\u0131n kendisine ait oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi, yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda, 10.12.2007 g\u00fcnl\u00fc duru\u015fma ifadesinde, \u2018trafik kazas\u0131 ge\u00e7irmi\u015ftim, hastanede yat\u0131yordum, bu nedenle bana ait CD\u2019leri karde\u015fim … benim ad\u0131ma sat\u0131yordu, ancak benim kendisine teslim etti\u011fim CD\u2019ler orijinal CD idi, di\u011ferlerinden haberim yoktur.\u2019 \u015feklinde beyanda bulunmu\u015f olup, 14.07.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda ise \u2018Ben tekel b\u00fcfesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yorum, olay tarihinde karde\u015fim … pazarda tezgahta CD satarken yakalanm\u0131\u015f, abi senin i\u015f yerin var, sana bir \u015fey olmaz, bu CD\u20191er senin diyelim dedi. Bunun \u00fczerine, bana ait oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledim. Ancak, bu CD’ler ile bir ilgim yoktur. Karde\u015fim satar.\u2019 \u015feklinde beyanda bulanarak, duru\u015fmadaki savunmalar\u0131nda at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anlat\u0131lan nedenlerle, olay an\u0131nda, olay yerinde bulunmay\u0131p, karde\u015finden ayr\u0131 yerde ikamet eden ve ayr\u0131 i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131k …\u2019in at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u, karde\u015fi olan san\u0131k … ile birlikte i\u015flediklerine dair, inkara y\u00f6nelik beyan\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131k … …\u2019in mahkumiyetine yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan beraat\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015feklide h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden bozulmas\u0131na\u201d \u015feklinde karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Netice olarak; CMK m.148\/4 ve m.213, birbirini tamamlayan ve soru\u015fturma evresinde m\u00fcdafi yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alan iki maddedir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmler bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; kanun koyucu, m\u00fcdafi bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan ifadenin, \u015f\u00fcphelinin\/san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki iradesine ba\u011fl\u0131 bir hukuki de\u011fere sahip oldu\u011funu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkeme huzurunda bu ifadeyi do\u011frulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yani su\u00e7lamay\u0131 reddetti\u011fi takdirde, bu ifadenin m\u00fcdafii olmaks\u0131z\u0131n verildi\u011finin ortaya koyulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmadaki beyanlar\u0131 ile \u00e7eli\u015fti\u011finden bahisle duru\u015fmada okunarak, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine bir delil olarak kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmek isteriz.<\/p>\n

Prof. Dr. Ersan \u015een<\/p>\n

Av. Tamer Berk Bayrakl\u0131<\/p>\n

(Bu makale, say\u0131n Prof. Dr. Ersan \u015eEN taraf\u0131ndan www.hukukihaber.net sitesinde yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kaynak g\u00f6sterilse dahi makalenin tamam\u0131 \u00f6zel izin al\u0131nmadan kullan\u0131lamaz. Ancak al\u0131nt\u0131lanan makalenin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, aktif link verilerek kullan\u0131labilir. Yazar\u0131 ve kayna\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmeden k\u0131smen ya da tamamen yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 \u015fahsi haklara ve fikri haklara ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil eder.)<\/p>\n

———–<\/p>\n

[1] Osman Ya\u015far, Cengiz Otac\u0131, Yeni \u0130\u00e7tihatlarla Uygulamal\u0131 ve Yorumlu Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu, 1.Cilt, 11. Bask\u0131, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2025, s.1310.<\/p>\n

\u200bBu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun \u201c\u0130fade ve sorgu usul\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda yer alan 148. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen; \u201cM\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk\u00e7a al\u0131nan ifade, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc do\u011frultusunda m\u00fcdafiinin huzurunda al\u0131nmayan \u015f\u00fcphelinin kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015fayet mahkemenin \u00e7eli\u015fki g\u00f6rmesi halinde, bu \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi gidermek amac\u0131yla duru\u015fmada kolluk tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n okunup okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, CMK m.213 uyar\u0131nca bu duruma itiraz edilip edilebilece\u011fi, bu do\u011frultuda Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 13.12.2023 tarihli, 2021\/17836 E. ve 2023\/25607 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 alabilece\u011fi, hem CMK m.149\/1\u2019de \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda bir veya birden fazla m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fini ve hem de \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.6\/3-c\u2019de, bir su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin, kendisini bizzat savunmak veya se\u00e7ece\u011fi bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, e\u011fer avukat tutmak i\u00e7in gerekli maddi olanaklardan yoksun ise ve adaletin yerine gelmesi i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, re\u2019sen atanacak bir avukat\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00fccretsiz olarak yaralanabilme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu yasal d\u00fczenlemelerle ortaya koyulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Kanun, m\u00fcdafii yard\u0131m\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ifadelerin do\u011frulu\u011funa karine olarak \u015f\u00fcphe ile yakla\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr ifadeler, ancak hakim veya mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde tekrarlan\u0131rsa \u015f\u00fcphe ortadan kalkacakt\u0131r. Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelinin al\u0131nan ifadesi, \u015f\u00fcpheliye yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f te\u015fhis veya yer g\u00f6sterme i\u015flemi hukuka uygun olsa bile, m\u00fcdafii haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ifade veya yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f i\u015flem, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmam\u0131\u015fsa h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz[1].<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 13.12.2023 tarihli, 2021\/17836 E. ve 2023\/25607 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na g\u00f6re; \u201cSan\u0131\u011f\u0131n, doktor olan kat\u0131lana yerine getirdi\u011fi g\u00f6rev nedeniyle aleni say\u0131lan hastane koridorunda \u2018Hastama bakm\u0131yorsun, senin gibi doktor olmaz olsun, anan\u0131, avrad\u0131n\u0131, bac\u0131n\u0131, dinini, iman\u0131n\u0131 sinkaf edeyim, o… \u00e7ocu\u011fu doktor.\u2019 \u015feklinde s\u00f6zler s\u00f6yleyerek hakaret etti\u011fi iddia ve Yerel Mahkemece kabul olunmu\u015ftur. Vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz sebepleri ile sair y\u00f6nlerden yap\u0131lan incelemede ba\u015fkaca nedenler yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ancak; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 148\u2019inci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan \u2018M\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk\u00e7a al\u0131nan ifade, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz\u2019 ve ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 213\u2019nc\u00fc maddesinde yer alan \u2018Aralar\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmas\u0131 halinde; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar ile Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan veya m\u00fcdafiin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu kolluk ifadesine ili\u015fkin tutanaklar duru\u015fmada okunabilir.\u2019 \u015feklindeki yasal d\u00fczenlemelere g\u00f6re; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceki ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunmas\u0131n\u0131n ilk ko\u015fulunun iki ifade aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmas\u0131, ikinci ko\u015fulun ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceki ifadesinin; hakim, mahkeme ya da Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya kollukta al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 taktirde ise ifadeye m\u00fcdafiin kat\u0131lmas\u0131 oldu\u011fu, somut olayda her ne kadar san\u0131k kolluk beyan\u0131nda \u2018\u0130t o\u011flu it dedim.\u2019 seklinde s\u00f6yledi\u011fini tevili ikrar etmi\u015f ise de, bu ifadenin m\u00fcdafii huzurunda al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, duru\u015fmada da b\u00f6yle bir s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylemedi\u011fini beyan etmesi nedeniyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafisiz kolluk ifadesinin d\u0131\u015flanmas\u0131 yerine h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lana \u2018\u2026dinini, iman\u0131n\u0131 sinkaf edeyim.\u2019 diyerek hakaret etmesi bi\u00e7imindeki eyleminin, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 125 inci maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendinde d\u00fczenlenen ki\u015finin mensup bulundu\u011fu dine g\u00f6re kutsal say\u0131lan de\u011ferlerden bahisle hakaret su\u00e7unu da olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, birden fazla nitelikli hal ihlaline neden olan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesindeki orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesi ve 61\u2019nci maddesindeki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler dikkate al\u0131narak, belirlenen temel cezada asgari hadden uzakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeyerek eksik ceza tayin edilmesi nedeniyle, karar hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u2026 A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir\u201d.<\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da yer verdi\u011fimiz Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131na konu olayda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcr etti\u011fi, kolluk ifadesinin m\u00fcdafii huzurunda verilmedi\u011fi, su\u00e7 ikrar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ise sinkafl\u0131 k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmedi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi, yani su\u00e7lamay\u0131 reddetti\u011fi, bu nedenle mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan CMK m.213 uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma a\u015famalar\u0131nda ifade ve savunmalar\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okundu\u011fu, ancak kollukta al\u0131nan ifadenin \u015f\u00fcphelinin m\u00fcdafii haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu do\u011frultuda CMK m.148\/4 uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcdafiin haz\u0131r bulunmadan kolluk\u00e7a san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fbu karara kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda m\u00fcdafii yoklu\u011funda kollukta verilen beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Belirtmeliyiz ki; soru\u015fturma evresinde \u015f\u00fcphelinin m\u00fcdafii huzurunda al\u0131nmayan kolluk ifadesi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturma evresinde tam tersi y\u00f6nde beyana yer vermesi, yani soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131n do\u011frulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 reddetti\u011fi bir durumda, bu beyanlar dikkate al\u0131namayacak, okunamayacak ve kolluk ifadesi ile yarg\u0131lamada al\u0131nan savunma ile aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkinin bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle kolluk ifadesi okunmak suretiyle \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi yoluna da gidilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n

Nitekim benzer y\u00f6nde Yarg\u0131tay 7. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 10.04.2013 tarihli 2011\/1567 E. ve 2013\/10237 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; \u201cSan\u0131k …\u2019in temyizine gelince; San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, haz\u0131rl\u0131kta verdi\u011fi savunmas\u0131na dayan\u0131lmak suretiyle mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc tesis edilmi\u015f ise de, san\u0131k … soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda m\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nan, 22.12.2006 tarihli kolluk ifadesinde, karde\u015fi olan san\u0131k …\u2019in seyyar tezgahta sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ele ge\u00e7irilen davaya konu e\u015fyan\u0131n kendisine ait oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi, yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda, 10.12.2007 g\u00fcnl\u00fc duru\u015fma ifadesinde, \u2018trafik kazas\u0131 ge\u00e7irmi\u015ftim, hastanede yat\u0131yordum, bu nedenle bana ait CD\u2019leri karde\u015fim … benim ad\u0131ma sat\u0131yordu, ancak benim kendisine teslim etti\u011fim CD\u2019ler orijinal CD idi, di\u011ferlerinden haberim yoktur.\u2019 \u015feklinde beyanda bulunmu\u015f olup, 14.07.2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda ise \u2018Ben tekel b\u00fcfesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yorum, olay tarihinde karde\u015fim … pazarda tezgahta CD satarken yakalanm\u0131\u015f, abi senin i\u015f yerin var, sana bir \u015fey olmaz, bu CD\u20191er senin diyelim dedi. Bunun \u00fczerine, bana ait oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledim. Ancak, bu CD’ler ile bir ilgim yoktur. Karde\u015fim satar.\u2019 \u015feklinde beyanda bulanarak, duru\u015fmadaki savunmalar\u0131nda at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anlat\u0131lan nedenlerle, olay an\u0131nda, olay yerinde bulunmay\u0131p, karde\u015finden ayr\u0131 yerde ikamet eden ve ayr\u0131 i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan san\u0131k …\u2019in at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u, karde\u015fi olan san\u0131k … ile birlikte i\u015flediklerine dair, inkara y\u00f6nelik beyan\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131k … …\u2019in mahkumiyetine yeterli delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan beraat\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015feklide h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131, temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden bozulmas\u0131na\u201d \u015feklinde karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Netice olarak; CMK m.148\/4 ve m.213, birbirini tamamlayan ve soru\u015fturma evresinde m\u00fcdafi yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alan iki maddedir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmler bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; kanun koyucu, m\u00fcdafi bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan ifadenin, \u015f\u00fcphelinin\/san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki iradesine ba\u011fl\u0131 bir hukuki de\u011fere sahip oldu\u011funu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkeme huzurunda bu ifadeyi do\u011frulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yani su\u00e7lamay\u0131 reddetti\u011fi takdirde, bu ifadenin m\u00fcdafii olmaks\u0131z\u0131n verildi\u011finin ortaya koyulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmadaki beyanlar\u0131 ile \u00e7eli\u015fti\u011finden bahisle duru\u015fmada okunarak, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine bir delil olarak kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmek isteriz.<\/p>\n

Prof. Dr. Ersan \u015een<\/p>\n

Av. Tamer Berk Bayrakl\u0131<\/p>\n

(Bu makale, say\u0131n Prof. Dr. Ersan \u015eEN taraf\u0131ndan www.hukukihaber.net sitesinde yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kaynak g\u00f6sterilse dahi makalenin tamam\u0131 \u00f6zel izin al\u0131nmadan kullan\u0131lamaz. Ancak al\u0131nt\u0131lanan makalenin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, aktif link verilerek kullan\u0131labilir. Yazar\u0131 ve kayna\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmeden k\u0131smen ya da tamamen yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 \u015fahsi haklara ve fikri haklara ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil eder.)<\/p>\n

———–<\/p>\n

[1] Osman Ya\u015far, Cengiz Otac\u0131, Yeni \u0130\u00e7tihatlarla Uygulamal\u0131 ve Yorumlu Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu, 1.Cilt, 11. Bask\u0131, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara, 2025, s.1310.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun \u201c\u0130fade ve sorgu usul\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda yer alan 148. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen; \u201cM\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk\u00e7a al\u0131nan ifade, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc do\u011frultusunda m\u00fcdafiinin huzurunda al\u0131nmayan \u015f\u00fcphelinin kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015fayet mahkemenin \u00e7eli\u015fki g\u00f6rmesi halinde, bu \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi gidermek amac\u0131yla duru\u015fmada kolluk tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n okunup okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, CMK m.213 uyar\u0131nca bu duruma itiraz edilip edilebilece\u011fi, bu do\u011frultuda Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 13.12.2023 tarihli, 2021\/17836 E. ve 2023\/25607 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 alabilece\u011fi, hem CMK m.149\/1\u2019de \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda bir veya birden fazla m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fini ve hem de \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.6\/3-c\u2019de, bir su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin, kendisini bizzat savunmak veya se\u00e7ece\u011fi bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, e\u011fer avukat tutmak i\u00e7in gerekli maddi olanaklardan yoksun ise ve adaletin yerine gelmesi i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, re\u2019sen atanacak bir avukat\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00fccretsiz olarak yaralanabilme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu yasal d\u00fczenlemelerle ortaya koyulmu\u015ftur. Kanun, m\u00fcdafii yard\u0131m\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ifadelerin do\u011frulu\u011funa karine olarak \u015f\u00fcphe ile yakla\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr ifadeler, ancak hakim veya mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde tekrarlan\u0131rsa \u015f\u00fcphe ortadan kalkacakt\u0131r. Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelinin al\u0131nan ifadesi, \u015f\u00fcpheliye yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nM\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi? - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun \u201c\u0130fade ve sorgu usul\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda yer alan 148. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen; \u201cM\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk\u00e7a al\u0131nan ifade, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc do\u011frultusunda m\u00fcdafiinin huzurunda al\u0131nmayan \u015f\u00fcphelinin kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015fayet mahkemenin \u00e7eli\u015fki g\u00f6rmesi halinde, bu \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi gidermek amac\u0131yla duru\u015fmada kolluk tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n okunup okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, CMK m.213 uyar\u0131nca bu duruma itiraz edilip edilebilece\u011fi, bu do\u011frultuda Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 13.12.2023 tarihli, 2021\/17836 E. ve 2023\/25607 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 alabilece\u011fi, hem CMK m.149\/1\u2019de \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda bir veya birden fazla m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fini ve hem de \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.6\/3-c\u2019de, bir su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin, kendisini bizzat savunmak veya se\u00e7ece\u011fi bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, e\u011fer avukat tutmak i\u00e7in gerekli maddi olanaklardan yoksun ise ve adaletin yerine gelmesi i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, re\u2019sen atanacak bir avukat\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00fccretsiz olarak yaralanabilme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu yasal d\u00fczenlemelerle ortaya koyulmu\u015ftur. Kanun, m\u00fcdafii yard\u0131m\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ifadelerin do\u011frulu\u011funa karine olarak \u015f\u00fcphe ile yakla\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr ifadeler, ancak hakim veya mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde tekrarlan\u0131rsa \u015f\u00fcphe ortadan kalkacakt\u0131r. Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelinin al\u0131nan ifadesi, \u015f\u00fcpheliye yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-02T15:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Verfasst von\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16\u00a0Minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi?\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-02T15:01:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3229,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/\",\"name\":\"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi? - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-02T15:01:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/hukukihaber\\\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/denizcankizil.tr\\\/de\\\/author\\\/hukukihabernet\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi? - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi?","og_description":"Bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun \u201c\u0130fade ve sorgu usul\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda yer alan 148. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen; \u201cM\u00fcdafi haz\u0131r bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n kolluk\u00e7a al\u0131nan ifade, hakim veya mahkeme huzurunda \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan do\u011frulanmad\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc do\u011frultusunda m\u00fcdafiinin huzurunda al\u0131nmayan \u015f\u00fcphelinin kolluk ifadesinin duru\u015fmada okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u015fayet mahkemenin \u00e7eli\u015fki g\u00f6rmesi halinde, bu \u00e7eli\u015fkiyi gidermek amac\u0131yla duru\u015fmada kolluk tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n okunup okunamayaca\u011f\u0131, CMK m.213 uyar\u0131nca bu duruma itiraz edilip edilebilece\u011fi, bu do\u011frultuda Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 13.12.2023 tarihli, 2021\/17836 E. ve 2023\/25607 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 kaleme al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 alabilece\u011fi, hem CMK m.149\/1\u2019de \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda bir veya birden fazla m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fini ve hem de \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.6\/3-c\u2019de, bir su\u00e7la itham edilen herkesin, kendisini bizzat savunmak veya se\u00e7ece\u011fi bir m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, e\u011fer avukat tutmak i\u00e7in gerekli maddi olanaklardan yoksun ise ve adaletin yerine gelmesi i\u00e7in gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, re\u2019sen atanacak bir avukat\u0131n yard\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00fccretsiz olarak yaralanabilme hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu yasal d\u00fczenlemelerle ortaya koyulmu\u015ftur. Kanun, m\u00fcdafii yard\u0131m\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ifadelerin do\u011frulu\u011funa karine olarak \u015f\u00fcphe ile yakla\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Bu t\u00fcr ifadeler, ancak hakim veya mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde tekrarlan\u0131rsa \u015f\u00fcphe ortadan kalkacakt\u0131r. Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelinin al\u0131nan ifadesi, \u015f\u00fcpheliye yapt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f …","og_url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-07-02T15:01:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Verfasst von":"Hukuki Haber.net","Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"16\u00a0Minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi?","datePublished":"2025-07-02T15:01:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/"},"wordCount":3229,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/","name":"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi? - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-07-02T15:01:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/mudafi-yoklugunda-suphelinin-kollukta-alinan-ifadesi-hukme-esas-alinabilir-mi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\u00fcdafi Yoklu\u011funda \u015e\u00fcphelinin Kollukta Al\u0131nan \u0130fadesi H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nabilir mi?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136956"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136956\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}