T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
ERKAN ALGI BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/37047)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Olcay \u00d6ZCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Erkan ALGI<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; izin al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n arac\u0131n \u00e7ilingir vas\u0131tas\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, arac\u0131n \u00e7ekilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ya\u015fanan olaylar ve ara\u00e7taki paran\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla hakaret, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 verilmesi ve g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada ise soru\u015fturma izni verilmemesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 22\/10\/2018 tarihinde Ak\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Savc\u0131l\u0131k) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. \u015eik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde 1\/10\/2018 tarihinde karde\u015fine ait ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kendisi oldu\u011fu arac\u0131n ar\u0131zal\u0131 \u015fekilde park yasa\u011f\u0131 olmayan yerde dururken polis ekiplerince sigortas\u0131z ve vizesiz oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7ekiciye y\u00fcklenerek otoparka g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu s\u0131rada g\u00f6revli polislerin hakaret etti\u011fini, bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda arac\u0131n \u00e7ilingir marifetiyle a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u00e7indeki tapular ile 23.000 Amerikan dolar\u0131n\u0131n (USD) kay\u0131p oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca yetkisiz \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan otopark\u0131n zorla ve fahi\u015f otopark bedeli talep etti\u011fini iddia etmi\u015f ve otopark g\u00f6revlisi\u015e.B. ile g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131O.D. ile \u00d6.A.\u00d6.den \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Savc\u0131l\u0131k, Ak\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden (Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc) ara\u00e7 \u00e7ekme olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan i\u015flemleri g\u00f6sterir evraklar\u0131n ve ceza i\u015flem tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n temin edilerek bir suretinin g\u00f6nderilmesini ve yediemin otopark i\u015fletmecisinin olaya ili\u015fkin bilgi sahibi s\u0131fat\u0131 ile beyan\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir. Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilen belgelere g\u00f6re an\u0131lan arac\u0131n trafikten men edilerek otoparka yediemin olarak b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcpheli \u015e.B. ve otopark \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 M.A.E. ifadelerinde, olay yerine polisler taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine arac\u0131 \u00e7ekici ile \u00e7ekmek i\u00e7in geldi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun arac\u0131n anahtarlar\u0131n\u0131n kendisinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini ve arac\u0131n \u00e7ekilmemesi i\u00e7in ba\u011f\u0131rmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arac\u0131n direksiyonu kilitli oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in kap\u0131n\u0131n polis nezaretinde ve \u00e7ilingir vas\u0131tas\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca \u015f\u00fcpheli \u015e.B. daha sonra arac\u0131 teslim almak i\u00e7in gelen ba\u015fvurucunun otopark paras\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ok bulunca ”bende sizi ara\u00e7ta param vard\u0131” diye \u015fik\u00e2yet edece\u011fim dedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Savc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun ve \u015f\u00fcpheli \u015e.B.nin savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yeniden alm\u0131\u015f ve g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin olarak 2\/12\/1999 tarihli ve 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Memurlar ve Di\u011fer Kamu G\u00f6revlilerinin Yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun uyar\u0131nca soru\u015fturma izni verilip verilmeyece\u011fi hususunda Ak\u015fehir Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Kaymakaml\u0131k) m\u00fczekkere yazarak bu konuda bir karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Savc\u0131l\u0131k 7\/7\/2020 tarihinde, g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131 O.D. ile \u00d6.A.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda hakaret ve h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k,\u015e.B. hakk\u0131nda ise ya\u011fma ve h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonunda kovu\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, arac\u0131n 1\/10\/2018 tarihinde otoparka \u00e7ekildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun ise 19\/10\/2018 tarihinde de\u011ferli e\u015fyalar\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek otoparka gitti\u011fi ve s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcracaat\u0131n\u0131 da 22\/10\/2018 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda iddias\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ile do\u011frulanamayan soyut iddialar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz Ak\u015fehir Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle 14\/9\/2020tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bu karar \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu 2020\/35537 say\u0131l\u0131 dosya ile Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuruda \u015fik\u00e2yeti nedeniyle ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ifadesi al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesi, soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede bitirilememesi, kararlarda gerek\u00e7e olmamas\u0131 ve arac\u0131na hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde girilmesinden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi Birinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm Birinci Komisyon 18\/10\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. G\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin polis memurlar\u0131 O.D.nin ile \u00d6.A.\u00d6.n\u00fcn haklar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme s\u0131ras\u0131nda beyanlar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. O.D. ile \u00d6.A.\u00d6. arac\u0131n trafik kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ihlali nedeniyle men tutana\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlediklerini, ba\u015fvurucunun arac\u0131n anahtar\u0131n\u0131n kendisinde olup vermeyece\u011fini beyan\u0131 \u00fczerine \u00e7ekici \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7ekici \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n arac\u0131n direksiyonunun kilitli oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine \u00e7ilingir \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda yanlar\u0131nda bulunup izledi\u011fini, arac\u0131n kendisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek tutana\u011fa imza atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015f ve su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmemi\u015ftir. 7\/8\/2020 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen \u00f6n inceleme raporunda ba\u015fvurucunun soyut iddias\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda paran\u0131n ara\u00e7tan al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu konuda ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131 uyarmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir hafta sonra otoparka giderek e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131p g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, en son otopark \u00fccretinin istenilmesi \u00fczerine ara\u00e7ta 23.000 USD oldu\u011funu ifade etti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015f ve soru\u015fturma izni verilmemesi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc bildirilmi\u015ftir. Kaymakaml\u0131k\u00e7a 10\/8\/2020 tarihinde soru\u015fturma izni verilmemesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131n karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz 6\/10\/2020 tarihinde Konya B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 1. \u0130dari Dava Dairesince (B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi) incelenmi\u015f ve isnat edilen fiilin Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelik ve yeterlilikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 22\/10\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 12\/11\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131 \u00fczerine Savc\u0131l\u0131k 23\/10\/2020 tarihinde, g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin polis memurlar\u0131 O.D. ile \u00d6.A.\u00d6. hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma \u015fart\u0131 olan soru\u015fturma izninin bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle evrak\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na itiraz kanun yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu karar da ba\u015fvurucuya 10\/11\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. Karara kar\u015f\u0131 itirazda bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 ve eklerinden bir tespit yap\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. \u00d6zel Hayata Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131 ile Hakaret, H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve Ya\u011fma Su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen Soru\u015fturma Dosyas\u0131nda Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
11. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 49. maddesinin (7) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n incelenmesinde, bu Kanun ve \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fckte h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan h\u00e2llerde ilgili usul kanunlar\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fine uygun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
12. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 114. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Dava \u015fartlar\u0131 \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
\u0131) Ayn\u0131 davan\u0131n, daha \u00f6nceden a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve h\u00e2len g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olmamas\u0131.<\/p>\n
i) Ayn\u0131 davan\u0131n, daha \u00f6nceden kesin h\u00fckme ba\u011flanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131.”<\/p>\n
13. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 115. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Mahkeme, dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederse davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verir. Ancak, dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ise bunun tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kesin s\u00fcre verir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde dava \u015fart\u0131 noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 giderilmemi\u015fse davay\u0131 dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu sebebiyle usulden reddeder.”<\/p>\n
14. Buna g\u00f6re bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n incelenmesinde 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck’te h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan h\u00e2llerde ilgili usul kanunlar\u0131n\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun niteli\u011fine uygun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanacakt\u0131r. Bireysel ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin mevzuatta m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ayn\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun ayn\u0131 nedenle birden fazla bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapmas\u0131 durumunda ba\u015fvurunun 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un dava \u015fartlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin yukar\u0131da belirtilen h\u00fck\u00fcmleri k\u0131yasen uygulanmak suretiyle reddedilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu; hakaret, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ve kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 verilen soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ihlal iddias\u0131yla daha \u00f6nce de bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi Birinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm Birinci Komisyon 18\/10\/2021 tarihinde, araca hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde girilmesine y\u00f6nelik \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelemi\u015f ve bu iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n ise konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun hakaret, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ve kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 verilen soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na ili\u015fkin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ihlal iddialar\u0131 ile araca hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 girilmesine y\u00f6nelik \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kalan ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrer oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrer olmas\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. G\u00f6revi K\u00f6t\u00fcye Kullanma Su\u00e7undan Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen Soru\u015fturma Dosyas\u0131nda Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; ara\u00e7 i\u00e7indeki paras\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n ifadesi al\u0131nmadan karar verildi\u011fini, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu ve makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun iste\u011finin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu, kovu\u015fturma izni verilmemesine dair karar\u0131n etkilerinin de ceza muhakemesi s\u00fcreci ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda ceza davas\u0131nda verilen karar\u0131n hukuk yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 bir etkisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 sundu\u011fu cevab\u0131nda, karde\u015finin de otoparktaki baz\u0131 olaylara tan\u0131k oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde beyan\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 45. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ihlal edildi\u011fi iddia edilen hakk\u0131n Anayasa\u2019da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) ve T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin taraf oldu\u011fu S\u00f6zle\u015fme’ye ek protokoller kapsam\u0131na da girmesi gerekir. Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin ortak koruma alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan hak ihlali iddias\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren ba\u015fvurular bireysel ba\u015fvurunun kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fildir (Onurhan Solmaz [1. B.], B. No: 2012\/1049, 26\/3\/2013, \u00a7 18).<\/p>\n
19. S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinde adil yarg\u0131lanmaya ili\u015fkin hak ve ilkelerin medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler ile ilgili uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n ve bir su\u00e7 isnad\u0131n\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 esnas\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu belirtilerek hakk\u0131n kapsam\u0131 bu konularla s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bahsedilen h\u00e2ller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddias\u0131na dayanan ba\u015fvurular Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalaca\u011f\u0131ndan bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu olamaz. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bir ceza davas\u0131nda haklar\u0131nda su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 bulunmayan ma\u011fdur, su\u00e7tan zarar g\u00f6ren, \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i veya kat\u0131lan s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 haiz ki\u015filer S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinin koruma alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalmaktad\u0131r (Onurhan Solmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 23, 24).<\/p>\n
20. Somut olayda su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131nda olmayan ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada soru\u015fturma izni verilmemesi, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz olmas\u0131 ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede bitirilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile hakaret, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n m\u00fckerrer olmas\u0131 nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. G\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
D. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 12\/6\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 12\/6\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/37047 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR ERKAN ALGI BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/37047) Karar Tarihi: 12\/6\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Olcay \u00d6ZCAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Erkan ALGI I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; izin al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n arac\u0131n \u00e7ilingir vas\u0131tas\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6zel hayata sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, arac\u0131n \u00e7ekilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ya\u015fanan olaylar ve ara\u00e7taki paran\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla hakaret, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 verilmesi ve g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma su\u00e7undan ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada ise soru\u015fturma izni verilmemesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 22\/10\/2018 tarihinde Ak\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Savc\u0131l\u0131k) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. \u015eik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde 1\/10\/2018 tarihinde karde\u015fine ait ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn kendisi oldu\u011fu arac\u0131n ar\u0131zal\u0131 \u015fekilde park yasa\u011f\u0131 olmayan yerde dururken polis ekiplerince sigortas\u0131z ve vizesiz oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle \u00e7ekiciye y\u00fcklenerek otoparka g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bu s\u0131rada g\u00f6revli polislerin hakaret etti\u011fini, bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda arac\u0131n \u00e7ilingir marifetiyle a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u00e7indeki tapular ile 23.000 Amerikan dolar\u0131n\u0131n (USD) kay\u0131p oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca yetkisiz \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan otopark\u0131n zorla ve fahi\u015f otopark bedeli talep etti\u011fini iddia etmi\u015f ve otopark g\u00f6revlisi\u015e.B. ile g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131O.D. ile \u00d6.A.\u00d6.den \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. 3. Savc\u0131l\u0131k, Ak\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden (Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc) …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-135837","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n