T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
ZEYNEP YERL\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/6127)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mutlu ALAF<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Zeynep YERL\u0130<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Semra DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin a\u00e7\u0131kta kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin olarak maa\u015f d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan mali haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ankara Defterdarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Muhasebe M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc emrinde veri haz\u0131rlama ve kontrol i\u015fletmeni olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktayken 22\/11\/2016 tarihli ve 677 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (677 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) uyar\u0131nca kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. G\u00f6reve iade edilmesi talebiyle Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna (OHAL Komisyon) yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Komisyon karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 15\/8\/2018 tarihinde kamu g\u00f6revine iade edilen ba\u015fvurucu, g\u00f6revine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucuya a\u00e7\u0131kta ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcrelere ili\u015fkin olarak maa\u015f \u00f6demesi 31\/12\/2018 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 4\/10\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile idareye ba\u015fvurarak a\u00e7\u0131kta ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcrelere ili\u015fkin \u00f6denen ayl\u0131klara yasal faiz i\u015fletilmek suretiyle hesaplanacak tutar\u0131n kendisine \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucunun talebi 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonu Kurulmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin De\u011fi\u015ftirilerek Kabul Edilmesine Dair Kanun’da ge\u00e7mi\u015f d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin faiz i\u015fletilmesine y\u00f6nelik h\u00fck\u00fcm olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle idare taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu, s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemin iptal edilmesi ve mali haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi talebiyle 30\/12\/2019 tarihinde Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme 31\/12\/2020 tarihli kararla i\u015flemin iptaline ve ba\u015fvurucuya yasal faiz \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130darenin istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 7. \u0130dari Dava Dairesi (Daire) 8\/12\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu kabul etmi\u015f ve davan\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Daire, karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine \u00f6deme yap\u0131lan 18\/12\/2018 tarihindeuygulamadan haberdar oldu\u011funu, altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 veya 6\/1\/1982 tarihli ve 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu’nun 11. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru yapmas\u0131 gerekirken yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esine dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Nihai karar 21\/12\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu 17\/1\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, hangi kalemler \u00fczerinden \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisinin verilmedi\u011fini, toplu \u00f6deme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6demenin faiziyle birlikte yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, faizin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini daha sonra s\u00f6zl\u00fc yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler neticesinde \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, davan\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00f6demeleri eksik almas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
8. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvuru mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Osman V\u0131r\u0131t ([1. B.], B. No: 2020\/13947, 8\/2\/2024) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Kararda kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yeniden g\u00f6reve ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihler aras\u0131nda kalan d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin maa\u015f, d\u00f6ner sermaye, performans \u00fccreti ve ders \u00fccretinin yasal faiziyle birlikte \u00f6denmesini talep eden ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ortada yaln\u0131zca maa\u015f \u00f6demesine y\u00f6nelik fiilen yap\u0131lan bir \u00f6deme d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun di\u011fer taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne ya da reddine ili\u015fkin bir idari i\u015flem bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde sadece maa\u015f tutar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6deme \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucunun di\u011fer mali hak taleplerinin reddedildi\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendi\u011finin kabul edilerek davan\u0131n s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddine karar verilmesinin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte mahkemenin bu yorumunun ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kat\u0131 bir yorum oldu\u011funu, bu yorumun ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde a\u011f\u0131r bir k\u00fclfete sebep oldu\u011funu, bu suretle ba\u015fvurucunun katlanmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00fclfetin hedeflenen me\u015fru ama\u00e7larla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda orant\u0131s\u0131z oldu\u011funu ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla Anayasa Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahalenin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6reve d\u00f6nmesinden sonra a\u00e7\u0131kta kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin olarak maa\u015f \u00f6demeleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ancak bu \u00f6demeye faizlerin de d\u00e2hil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda ba\u015fvurucuya bir bilgi verilmemi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte yap\u0131lan bu \u00f6demenin di\u011fer mali haklar\u0131n daha sonra \u00f6denece\u011fine ya da \u00f6denmeyece\u011fine ili\u015fkin kesin bir bilgiyi kendili\u011finden ihtiva etti\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lamaz. Bu itibarla somut ba\u015fvuruda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6r\u00fclen davan\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n da ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fclmekle birlikte mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verildi\u011finden bu a\u015famada m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama ve 5.000,00 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerinin yapmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
17. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, reddine ya da beraate veya mahk\u00fbmiyete karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak yarg\u0131lama sonunda da delillerin dava ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili mahkemelere aittir.<\/p>\n
18. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 7. \u0130dari Dava Dairesine (E.2021\/2295, K.2021\/2424) iletilmek \u00fczere Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2019\/2525, K.2020\/2397) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 664,10 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.664,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 25\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLEkarar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 25\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/6127 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR ZEYNEP YERL\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/6127) Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mutlu ALAF Ba\u015fvurucu : Zeynep YERL\u0130 Vekili : Av. Semra DEM\u0130R I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu g\u00f6revlisinin a\u00e7\u0131kta kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neme ili\u015fkin olarak maa\u015f d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan mali haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ankara Defterdarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Muhasebe M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc emrinde veri haz\u0131rlama ve kontrol i\u015fletmeni olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktayken 22\/11\/2016 tarihli ve 677 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (677 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) uyar\u0131nca kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. G\u00f6reve iade edilmesi talebiyle Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna (OHAL Komisyon) yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Komisyon karar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 15\/8\/2018 tarihinde kamu g\u00f6revine iade edilen ba\u015fvurucu, g\u00f6revine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucuya a\u00e7\u0131kta ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcrelere ili\u015fkin olarak maa\u015f \u00f6demesi 31\/12\/2018 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 4\/10\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile idareye ba\u015fvurarak a\u00e7\u0131kta ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi s\u00fcrelere ili\u015fkin \u00f6denen ayl\u0131klara yasal faiz i\u015fletilmek suretiyle hesaplanacak tutar\u0131n kendisine \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucunun talebi 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonu Kurulmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-135834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n