T.C.<\/p>\n
YARGITAY<\/p>\n
2. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/p>\n
Esas Numaras\u0131: 2023\/4109<\/p>\n
Karar Numaras\u0131: 2024\/1805<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 14.03.2024<\/p>\n
EVL\u0130L\u0130K B\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130N TEMEL\u0130NDEN SARSILMASI NEDEN\u0130YLE BO\u015eANMA \u0130STEM\u0130<\/p>\n
ORTAK \u00c7OCU\u011eUN VEL\u00c2YET\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00c7OCU\u011eUN; DO\u011eUMUNDAN HEMEN SONRA BABAYA TESL\u0130M ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/p>\n
EBEVEYN SORUMLULUKLARINI GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u0130B\u0130 YER\u0130NE GET\u0130RMEYEN ANNEYE VER\u0130LMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00c7OCU\u011eUN HUZUR VE GEL\u0130\u015e\u0130M\u0130N\u0130 TEHL\u0130KEYE SOKACA\u011eI<\/p>\n
\u00c7OCU\u011eUN \u00dcST\u00dcN YARARI \u0130LKES\u0130<\/p>\n
ORTAK \u00c7OCU\u011eUN VEL\u00c2YET\u0130N\u0130N BABAYA VER\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00d6ZET\u0130: Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, evlilik birli\u011finin ortak hayat\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmeleri taraflardan beklenmeyecek derecede temelinden sars\u0131l\u0131p sars\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise daval\u0131 erke\u011fe y\u00fcklenen kusurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, kad\u0131n\u0131n temyize ba\u015fvurulmamak suretiyle kesinle\u015fen kusurlar\u0131 yan\u0131nda kusurunun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusur belirlemesinin do\u011fru yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusur belirlemesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak davan\u0131n ve kad\u0131n\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn, do\u011fru olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin anneye verilmesinin \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 nafakalar, tazminatlar ve miktarlar\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Toplanan deliller ve \u00f6zellikle Mahkemece al\u0131nan sosyal inceleme raporuna g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocu\u011fun; do\u011fumundan hemen sonra babaya teslim edildi\u011fi, bu zamana kadar baba yan\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bulundu\u011fu ortama uyum sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, baba ve babaanne ile g\u00fcvenli ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu, anne ile bu zamana kadar hi\u00e7 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi, baba yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedeni, fikri ve ahlaki geli\u015fmesine engel olaca\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin, do\u011fum yapar yapmaz babaya teslim eden, ebeveyn sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131 gere\u011fi gibi yerine getirmeyen anneye verilmesinin \u00e7ocu\u011fun huzur ve geli\u015fimini tehlikeye sokaca\u011f\u0131 ve \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin babaya verilmesi gerekirken anneye verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 11. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
SAYISI : 2020\/1020 E., 2022\/1841 K.<\/p>\n
DAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 02.08.2017<\/p>\n
KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurma<\/p>\n
\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul Anadolu 10. Aile Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
SAYISI : 2017\/619 E., 2019\/859 K.<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131n davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc tamemen kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ve bo\u015fanman\u0131n fer’\u00eelerine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. DAVA<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; erke\u011fin sorumsuz ve ge\u00e7imsiz oldu\u011fu, fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tehdit ve hakaret etti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkiline kar\u015f\u0131 sayg\u0131 g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini, ki\u015fili\u011fine, psikolojisine ve sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131na zarar verdi\u011fini, en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck sorunlar\u0131 bile b\u00fcy\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, tart\u0131\u015fma konusu yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u015feyler y\u00fcz\u00fcnden d\u00f6vmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hatta bir gece boyunca m\u00fcvekkilini d\u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, m\u00fcvekkili 7,5 bu\u00e7uk ayl\u0131k hamile iken feci bir \u015fekilde d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, karn\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde sa\u00e7\u0131ndan tutularak s\u00fcreklendi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilini ite kaka babas\u0131n\u0131n evine g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, m\u00fcvekkilinin karakola giderek \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu ve koruma karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini iddia ederek; taraflar\u0131n evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin anneye verilmesine, \u00e7ocuk yarar\u0131na ayl\u0131k 500,00 TL tedbir ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na ayl\u0131k 500,00 TL tedbir ve yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ile 15.000,00 TL madd\u00ee, 50.000,00 TL manev\u00ee tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. CEVAP<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 erkek vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; kad\u0131n\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n as\u0131ls\u0131z ve ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011funu, kad\u0131na \u015fiddet uygulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun do\u011fdu\u011fu g\u00fcn terk edildi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00e7ocuk ile ilgilendi\u011fini, \u0131srarlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u00e7ocu\u011funu aray\u0131p sormad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, taraflar\u0131n aras\u0131ndaki ge\u00e7imsizli\u011fin as\u0131l nedeninin kad\u0131n\u0131n evlilik birli\u011finin sorumlulu\u011funu kald\u0131ramamas\u0131 ve benimseyememesi oldu\u011funu, ev han\u0131m\u0131 oldu\u011funu ancak hi\u00e7 bir zaman ev i\u015fleri ile ilgilenmedi\u011fini, yemek, temizlik gibi i\u015fleri yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck meseleleri dahi \u00e7ok b\u00fcy\u00fck problemler haline getirdi\u011fini beyan ederek; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; kad\u0131n\u0131n hamile iken evi terk etti\u011fi, do\u011fum yapt\u0131ktan hemen sonra anne sevgi, \u015fefkati ve bak\u0131m\u0131na muhta\u00e7 olan ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fu daval\u0131 erke\u011fe verdi\u011fi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun bak\u0131m\u0131 ve beslenmesinden ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7imsizlik bulundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin daval\u0131 erkekten kaynaklanan herhangi bir kusur bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusura neden olabilecek mahiyetteki olaylar\u0131n ise \u00fcst\u00fcnden 2 y\u0131l ge\u00e7tikten sonra dava edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle; ispatlanamayan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/p>\n
A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davan\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak talepleri do\u011frultusunda karar verilmesi istemi ile istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, \u0130stanbul Anadolu 42. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 2015\/544 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda 03.08.2015 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ve erke\u011fin mahkumiyetine karar verilen basit yaralama eyleminden sonra taraflar\u0131n biraraya geldikleri, iki y\u0131l sonra kad\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131n iyi niyet kurallar\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi ancak taraflar\u0131n 03.08.2015 tarihindeki olaydan sonra ayr\u0131 ya\u015famaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, kad\u0131n\u0131n hamile iken evden ayr\u0131lmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, do\u011fumunu da ayr\u0131 olduklar\u0131 d\u00f6nemde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, en son ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011fa neden olan \u015fiddet olay\u0131n\u0131n erke\u011fe kusur olarak y\u00fcklenmesi gerekti\u011fi, evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131na neden olan olaylarda \u015fiddet uygulayan erkek a\u011f\u0131r, anne ilgi ve \u015fefkatine ihtiyac\u0131 olan \u00e7ocu\u011fu babas\u0131na b\u0131rakmak sureti ile ilgisiz davranan kad\u0131n ise az kusurlu oldu\u011fu, bo\u015fanma sebebiyle mevcut veya beklenen menfaatleri zedelenen ve ki\u015filik haklar\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frayan kad\u0131n e\u015f yarar\u0131na madd\u00ee ve manev\u00ee tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi, kad\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fanmakla yoksullu\u011fa d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi, ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131, anne ilgi ve \u015fefkatine ihtiyac\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak vel\u00e2yetinin anneye verilmesinin \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na olaca\u011f\u0131 ve vel\u00e2yet kendisine verilmeyen e\u015fin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n bak\u0131m ve e\u011fitim giderlerine g\u00fcc\u00fc oran\u0131nda kat\u0131lmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle; kad\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kusur belirlemesi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden esastan kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n tamamen kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 166 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, ortak \u00e7ocuk H\u00fcseyin’in vel\u00e2yetinin anneye verilmesine, \u00e7ocuk ile baba aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na, \u00e7ocuk yarar\u0131na, \u00e7ocu\u011fun anneye tesliminden itibaren ayl\u0131k 400,00 TL i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na, kad\u0131n\u0131n yarar\u0131na dava tarihinden itibaren ayl\u0131k 400,00 TL tedbir karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden itibaren 400,00 TL yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ile 15.000,00 TL madd\u00ee, 15.000,00 TL manev\u00ee tazminata, karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n
A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 erkek vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 erkek vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; karar\u0131n usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011funu beyanla; tamam\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n
1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, evlilik birli\u011finin ortak hayat\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmeleri taraflardan beklenmeyecek derecede temelinden sars\u0131l\u0131p sars\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise daval\u0131 erke\u011fe y\u00fcklenen kusurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, kad\u0131n\u0131n temyize ba\u015fvurulmamak suretiyle kesinle\u015fen kusurlar\u0131 yan\u0131nda kusurunun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusur belirlemesinin do\u011fru yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusur belirlemesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak davan\u0131n ve kad\u0131n\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn, do\u011fru olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin anneye verilmesinin \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 nafakalar, tazminatlar ve miktarlar\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n
6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 190 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesi, 369 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 370 ve 371 inci maddeleri. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc ve 6 nc\u0131 maddesi, 166 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 169 uncu, 174 \u00fcnc\u00fc, 175 inci, 176 nc\u0131, 182 nci, 327 nci, 328 inci, 330 uncu, 335 inci ve 336 nc\u0131 maddesi. 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 50 nci ve 51 inci maddeleri. Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc, 9 uncu ve 12 nci maddeleri, \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc, 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc ve 6 nc\u0131 maddeleri.<\/p>\n
3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
1.Taraflar\u0131n iddia, savunma ve dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki nitelendirilmesi ile uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131na, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lamaya h\u00e2kim olan ilkelere, ispat kurallar\u0131na ve temyiz olunan kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragraflar\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2.Vel\u00e2yet d\u00fczenlemesi yap\u0131l\u0131rken g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131 gereken temel ilke \u201c\u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131”d\u0131r. Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re, kamusal ya da \u00f6zel sosyal yard\u0131m kurulu\u015flar\u0131, mahkemeler, idari makamlar veya yasama organlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ve \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 ilgilendiren b\u00fct\u00fcn faaliyetlerde, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131 temel d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncedir. \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 belirlerken onun bedensel, zihinsel, ruhsal, ahl\u00e2ki ve toplumsal geli\u015fiminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi gereklidir. Anne ve baban\u0131n yararlar\u0131, bo\u015fanmadaki kusurlar\u0131, ahl\u00e2ki de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131, sosyal konumlar\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131 etkilemedi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulur. Vel\u00e2yet d\u00fczenlemesi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, re’sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma ilkesi ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu nedenle, yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen geli\u015fmelerin dahi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekir. Taraflar\u0131n davay\u0131 kabul\u00fc de tek ba\u015f\u0131na hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n
3.Somut olayda, taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fu 04.05.2015 do\u011fumlu H\u00fcseyin’in vel\u00e2yetinin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi’nce anneye verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f, karar daval\u0131 baba vekili taraf\u0131ndan vel\u00e2yet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 24.04.2018 tarihli uzman raporunda; taraflar\u0131n , \u00e7ocu\u011fun do\u011fumundan \u00f6nce ayr\u0131 ya\u015famaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131, annenin do\u011fum yapt\u0131ktan hemen sonra, anne sevgi, \u015fefkati ve bak\u0131m\u0131na muhta\u00e7 olan \u00e7ocu\u011fu emzirmeyi reddederek daval\u0131 babaya verdi\u011fi, annenin \u00e7ocu\u011fu bu ya\u015f\u0131na kadar hi\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun da annesini tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun, bak\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n bu zamana kadar baba ve babaanne taraf\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun baba ve babaannesiyle etkile\u015fimlerinin oldu\u011fu ve bu ki\u015filerle g\u00fcvenli ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu, \u00e7ocu\u011fun do\u011fdu\u011fu andan itibaren anne ile fiziksel ya da duygusal ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve duygusal ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu ki\u015filerden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun psikososyal geli\u015fimi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan uygun olmayaca\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yet hakk\u0131n\u0131n babada kalmas\u0131n\u0131n daha faydal\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ki\u015filik yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n geli\u015fimi a\u00e7s\u0131ndan \u00f6zde\u015fim nesnesi olan anneye de ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu, anne ile kurulacak ili\u015fkinin de ilk \u00f6nce belirli bir s\u00fcre yat\u0131s\u0131z \u015fekilde, sonras\u0131nda kademeli olarak artt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p yat\u0131l\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclerek \u00e7ocukla anne aras\u0131nda g\u00fcvenli ba\u011f\u0131n nas\u0131l kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ve taraflar\u0131n bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te nas\u0131l davranmalar\u0131na dair dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k tedbiri verilmesinin \u00e7ocu\u011fa sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 yarar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan gerekli olabilece\u011fini belirterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin babaya verilmesinin \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na olaca\u011f\u0131na dair kanaat bildirildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4.Yap\u0131lan tahkikat, toplanan deliller ve \u00f6zellikle Mahkemece al\u0131nan sosyal inceleme raporuna g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocu\u011fun; do\u011fumundan hemen sonra babaya teslim edildi\u011fi, bu zamana kadar baba yan\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bulundu\u011fu ortama uyum sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, baba ve babaanne ile g\u00fcvenli ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu, anne ile bu zamana kadar hi\u00e7 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi, baba yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedeni, fikri ve ahlaki geli\u015fmesine engel olaca\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin, do\u011fum yapar yapmaz babaya teslim eden, ebeveyn sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131 gere\u011fi gibi yerine getirmeyen anneye verilmesinin \u00e7ocu\u011fun huzur ve geli\u015fimini tehlikeye sokaca\u011f\u0131 ve \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin babaya verilmesi gerekirken anneye verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
VII. KARAR<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple;<\/p>\n
1.Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yeti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden daval\u0131 erkek yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
2.Daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 370 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n
Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine,<\/p>\n
Dosyan\u0131n B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n
14.03.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
legalbank.net<\/p>\n
\u200bUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, evlilik birli\u011finin ortak hayat\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmeleri taraflardan beklenmeyecek derecede temelinden sars\u0131l\u0131p sars\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise daval\u0131 erke\u011fe y\u00fcklenen kusurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, kad\u0131n\u0131n temyize ba\u015fvurulmamak suretiyle kesinle\u015fen kusurlar\u0131 yan\u0131nda kusurunun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusur belirlemesinin do\u011fru yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131…\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. YARGITAY 2. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 Esas Numaras\u0131: 2023\/4109 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2024\/1805 Karar Tarihi: 14.03.2024 EVL\u0130L\u0130K B\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130N TEMEL\u0130NDEN SARSILMASI NEDEN\u0130YLE BO\u015eANMA \u0130STEM\u0130 ORTAK \u00c7OCU\u011eUN VEL\u00c2YET\u0130 \u00c7OCU\u011eUN; DO\u011eUMUNDAN HEMEN SONRA BABAYA TESL\u0130M ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 EBEVEYN SORUMLULUKLARINI GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u0130B\u0130 YER\u0130NE GET\u0130RMEYEN ANNEYE VER\u0130LMES\u0130N\u0130N \u00c7OCU\u011eUN HUZUR VE GEL\u0130\u015e\u0130M\u0130N\u0130 TEHL\u0130KEYE SOKACA\u011eI \u00c7OCU\u011eUN \u00dcST\u00dcN YARARI \u0130LKES\u0130 ORTAK \u00c7OCU\u011eUN VEL\u00c2YET\u0130N\u0130N BABAYA VER\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u00d6ZET\u0130: Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, evlilik birli\u011finin ortak hayat\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmeleri taraflardan beklenmeyecek derecede temelinden sars\u0131l\u0131p sars\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise daval\u0131 erke\u011fe y\u00fcklenen kusurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, kad\u0131n\u0131n temyize ba\u015fvurulmamak suretiyle kesinle\u015fen kusurlar\u0131 yan\u0131nda kusurunun bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusur belirlemesinin do\u011fru yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kusur belirlemesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak davan\u0131n ve kad\u0131n\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn, do\u011fru olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin anneye verilmesinin \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131na olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 nafakalar, tazminatlar ve miktarlar\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r. Toplanan deliller ve \u00f6zellikle Mahkemece al\u0131nan sosyal inceleme raporuna g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocu\u011fun; do\u011fumundan hemen sonra babaya teslim edildi\u011fi, bu zamana kadar baba yan\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bulundu\u011fu ortama uyum sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, baba ve babaanne ile g\u00fcvenli ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu, anne ile bu zamana kadar hi\u00e7 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi, baba yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedeni, fikri ve ahlaki geli\u015fmesine engel olaca\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun vel\u00e2yetinin, do\u011fum yapar yapmaz babaya teslim eden, ebeveyn sorumluluklar\u0131n\u0131 gere\u011fi gibi yerine getirmeyen anneye verilmesinin \u00e7ocu\u011fun huzur ve geli\u015fimini tehlikeye sokaca\u011f\u0131 ve …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n