T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
14. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/11387 E., 2017\/6507 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi
\nSU\u00c7 : Beden veya ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozacak \u015fekilde \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahkumiyet<\/p>\n
\u0130lk derece mahkemesince bozma \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Ma\u011fdurenin a\u015famalardaki anlat\u0131mlar\u0131, savunma ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda olu\u015fa uygun kabule g\u00f6re, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131 A\u011fustos ay\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde kayden ond\u00f6rt y\u0131l dokuz ayl\u0131k olan ma\u011fdure ile su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun cebir veya tehdit olmaks\u0131z\u0131n cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmelerinin ard\u0131ndan olay\u0131n duyulmas\u0131 nedeniyle birlikte ka\u00e7arak yakla\u015f\u0131k \u00fc\u00e7 ay kadar su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun evinde ya\u015fad\u0131ktan sonra ya\u015fanan tart\u0131\u015fma sonucu su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun ma\u011fdureye vurup istemedi\u011fini belirtmesi nedeniyle ma\u011fdurenin ailesinin yan\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fcp \u015fikayet etmesi \u00fczerine adli makamlara intikal eden olayda, Dairemizin 28.09.2015 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/10064 Esas, 2015\/8581 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere su\u00e7un olu\u015fumu ile vasf\u0131na etkisi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurenin ya\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tam te\u015fekk\u00fcll\u00fc bir hastaneden i\u00e7inde radyoloji uzman\u0131n\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu raporu al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun hukuki durumunun tayin ve takdiri gerekti\u011fi belirtilmesine ra\u011fmen, mahkemece bozma sonras\u0131 ma\u011fdurenin ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine ili\u015fkin olarak h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan Atat\u00fcrk \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli T\u0131p Anabilim Dal\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.02.2016 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, 42190979-11.02\/494-600 say\u0131l\u0131 raporunun sadece iki adli t\u0131p uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tanzim edilip rapor i\u00e7eri\u011finde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yer alan Radyoloji Anabilim Dal\u0131 Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n 07.12.2015 tarihli grafiye g\u00f6re, ma\u011fdurenin ondokuz-yirmi, 08.01.2016 \u00e7ekim tarihli grafiye g\u00f6reyse yirmi-yirmibir ya\u015f aral\u0131\u011f\u0131na uydu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ya\u015f\u0131 etkileyecek \u015fekilde iki farkl\u0131 kanaat belirtti\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, an\u0131lan raporun i\u00e7erik ve \u015fekil olarak ma\u011fdurenin 2011 A\u011fustos ay\u0131ndaki ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 kesin olarak belirlemeye elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, Dairemiz karar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde Adli T\u0131p Kurumundan rapor ald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 218\/2. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc de g\u00f6zetilerek ger\u00e7ek ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n saptanmas\u0131ndan sonra su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun hukuki durumunun tayin ve takdiri gerekti\u011fi ve yine ma\u011fdurenin al\u0131nacak raporunda su\u00e7 tarihinde onbe\u015f ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck oldu\u011funun kesin olarak tespit edilmesi halinde de ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Atat\u00fcrk \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 24.02.2016 g\u00fcnl\u00fc raporda, olaydan kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozacak mahiyet ve derecede olan travma sonras\u0131 stres tan\u0131s\u0131 ile ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bozuldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015f ise de, t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re aralar\u0131nda fazla ya\u015f fark\u0131 olmay\u0131p ve her ikisi de olay tarihinde \u00e7ocuk stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde olan su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk ile ma\u011fdure aras\u0131nda darp, cebir, tehdit veya iradeyi etkileyen ba\u015fka bir neden bulunmaks\u0131z\u0131n cinsel istismar eyleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi, ailesinin su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesine izin vermedi\u011fi i\u00e7in onunla ka\u00e7\u0131p birlikte ya\u015famaya ba\u015flayan ma\u011fdurenin yakla\u015f\u0131k \u00fc\u00e7 ay sonra ya\u015fanan tart\u0131\u015fmada su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun kendisine vurup istemedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi nedeniyle ailesinin yan\u0131na geri d\u00f6nmek durumunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki bozulman\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 cinsel istismar olay\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 m\u0131 geli\u015fti\u011fi, yoksa hile, \u015fiddet veya zorlama olmaks\u0131z\u0131n erken ya\u015fta cinsel deneyim ya\u015famas\u0131 veya olay sonras\u0131 geli\u015fen psikososyal stres ve \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar nedeniyle mi olu\u015ftu\u011fu konusunda usul\u00fcne uygun heyetten rapor al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 103\/6. maddesinin uygulan\u0131p uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuk m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan ma\u011fdure vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8\/1. maddesi g\u00f6zetilerek 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’n\u0131n 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 18.12.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay\u00a014. Ceza Dairesi’nin 18.12.2017 tarihli, 2016\/11387 E., 2017\/6507 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 14. Ceza Dairesi 2016\/11387 E., 2017\/6507 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SU\u00c7 : Beden veya ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozacak \u015fekilde \u00e7ocu\u011fun nitelikli cinsel istismar\u0131 H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahkumiyet \u0130lk derece mahkemesince bozma \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Ma\u011fdurenin a\u015famalardaki anlat\u0131mlar\u0131, savunma ile t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda olu\u015fa uygun kabule g\u00f6re, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131 A\u011fustos ay\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde kayden ond\u00f6rt y\u0131l dokuz ayl\u0131k olan ma\u011fdure ile su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun cebir veya tehdit olmaks\u0131z\u0131n cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmelerinin ard\u0131ndan olay\u0131n duyulmas\u0131 nedeniyle birlikte ka\u00e7arak yakla\u015f\u0131k \u00fc\u00e7 ay kadar su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun evinde ya\u015fad\u0131ktan sonra ya\u015fanan tart\u0131\u015fma sonucu su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun ma\u011fdureye vurup istemedi\u011fini belirtmesi nedeniyle ma\u011fdurenin ailesinin yan\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fcp \u015fikayet etmesi \u00fczerine adli makamlara intikal eden olayda, Dairemizin 28.09.2015 g\u00fcn ve 2013\/10064 Esas, 2015\/8581 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere su\u00e7un olu\u015fumu ile vasf\u0131na etkisi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurenin ya\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tam te\u015fekk\u00fcll\u00fc bir hastaneden i\u00e7inde radyoloji uzman\u0131n\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu raporu al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocu\u011fun hukuki durumunun tayin ve takdiri gerekti\u011fi belirtilmesine ra\u011fmen, mahkemece bozma sonras\u0131 ma\u011fdurenin ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine ili\u015fkin olarak h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan Atat\u00fcrk \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli T\u0131p Anabilim Dal\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.02.2016 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, 42190979-11.02\/494-600 say\u0131l\u0131 raporunun sadece iki adli t\u0131p uzman\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tanzim edilip rapor i\u00e7eri\u011finde …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n