T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
2. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2023\/19981 E., 2023\/7277 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
B O Z M A \u00dc Z E R \u0130 N E<\/p>\n
\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi
\nSAYISI : 2022\/424 E., 2023\/121 K.
\nSU\u00c7 :Konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahk\u00fbmiyet
\nTEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Onama<\/p>\n
San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bozma \u00fczerine kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn; karar tarihi itibar\u0131yla 6723 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 33. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 8. maddesi gere\u011fi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu\u2019nun 305. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 260\/1. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 310. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 317. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz iste\u011finin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmekle gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/p>\n
1. Mu\u011fla Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 27.08.2010 tarihli ve 2010\/1864 Esas No’lu iddianamesi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 116\/1-4, 53. maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve hak yoksunluklar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesi talebiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 10.05.2011 tarihli ve 2010\/308 Esas, 2011\/215 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 116\/4, 62. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilerek 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 231\/5. f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n 14.09.2011 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 19.04.2016 tarihli ve 2016\/58 Esas, 2016\/126 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, tabi tutuldu\u011fu denetim s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde … bir kas\u0131tl\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011finin ihbar\u0131 \u00fczerine 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 231\/11. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 116\/4, 62. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. An\u0131lan karar\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafi taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 2. Ceza Dairesinin 01.11.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/7359 Esas, 2022\/17996 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile ” 1-San\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u015famalarda kat\u0131lan\u0131n e\u015fi olan … Usta ile su\u00e7 tarihinde gece vakti evinde birlikte olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ancak ba\u015fka bir tarihte … Usta ile r\u0131zas\u0131 dahilinde evinin mutfa\u011f\u0131nda cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunmas\u0131, tan\u0131k … ile … Usta’n\u0131n da beyanlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda da \u00e7eli\u015fki bulunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011fa at\u0131l\u0131 eylemin gece vakti i\u015flendi\u011fine dair her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak delil bulunmamas\u0131 sebebiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK 116\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yerine eylemin gece vakti i\u015flendi\u011finin kabul\u00fc ile TCK’n\u0131n 116\/4. madde uyar\u0131nca fazla ceza tayini,<\/p>\n
2-Konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali su\u00e7unun su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131nda bulunmayan TCK\u2019n\u0131n 102\/1 maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7u ile birlikte i\u015flendi\u011fi iddia edildi\u011finden, CMK 253\/3. maddesine g\u00f6re uzla\u015fma kapsam\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7undan hakk\u0131nda 10.05.2011 tarihinde beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi ve bu karar\u0131n 13.10.2014 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali su\u00e7u i\u00e7in CMK\u2019n\u0131n 253 ve 254. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca uzla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuksal durumunun belirlenmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi” nedenleriyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Bozma \u00fczerine Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 14.04.2022 tarihli ve 2021\/363 Esas, 2022\/161 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 116\/1, 62. maddesi gere\u011fince 5 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunluklar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir .<\/p>\n
6. Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 14.04.2022 tarihli ve 2021\/363 Esas, 2022\/161 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 2. Ceza Dairesinin 01.11.2022 tarihli ve 2022\/7359 Esas, 2022\/17996 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile,”19.08.2020 tarihli ve 31218 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanarak ayn\u0131 tarihte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesinin 25.06.2020 tarihli ve 2020\/16 Esas, 2020\/33 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131 ile yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan ge\u00e7ici madde 5\/1-d’de yer … “Kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f” ibaresinin, bilahare 16.03.2021 tarihli ve 31425 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin 14.01.2021 tarihli ve 2020\/81 Esas, 2021\/4 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 iptal karar\u0131 ile de, yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan ge\u00e7ici madde 5\/1-d\u2019de yer … \u201cH\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f\u201d ibaresinin ayn\u0131 bentte yer …, “basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc” y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funa ve iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 251\/3. maddesinde \u201cBasit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc uygulanan dosyalarda sonu\u00e7 ceza d\u00f6rtte bir oran\u0131nda indirilir\u201d \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fi maddi ceza hukuku anlam\u0131nda san\u0131k lehine sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaya elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131 nedeniyle, temyize konu ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 251\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131na giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 116\/1. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 7. ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 251. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca yeniden de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,” nedeniyle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Bozma \u00fczerine Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 11.04.2023 tarihli, 2022\/424 Esas, 2023\/121 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 116\/1, 62. maddesi gere\u011fince 5 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 53. maddesi uyar\u0131nca hak yoksunluklar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. TEMY\u0130Z SEBEPLER\u0130<\/p>\n
San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz iste\u011fi; … ile eve girildi\u011fini, su\u00e7un olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraat etmesi gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
San\u0131k ile kat\u0131lan …’n\u0131n arkada\u015f olmalar\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u0131k s\u0131k kat\u0131lan\u0131n evine gidip geldi\u011fi, kat\u0131lan …’in san\u0131k ve di\u011fer arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 misafir etti\u011fi, zaman zaman i\u00e7ki i\u00e7ip yemek yedikleri, bu s\u0131rada kat\u0131lan\u0131n e\u015fi … ‘nin de misafirlere hizmet etti\u011fi, ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde … ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yak\u0131nla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131, ili\u015fkilerini bir s\u00fcre saklad\u0131klar\u0131, ancak daha sonra hamile oldu\u011funu anlayan …’nin durumdan e\u015fini haberdar etti\u011fi ve r\u0131zas\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine tecav\u00fcz etti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, …’nin s\u00f6z konusu iddias\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda … Usta\u2019ya kar\u015f\u0131 cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada san\u0131k ile …’nin cinsel birliktelikleri oldu\u011fu ve bunun sonucunda … ‘nin bir bebek d\u00fcnyaya getirdi\u011fi dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmakla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n …’ye kar\u015f\u0131 zorla cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131da bulundu\u011funa dair dosyada delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, …’nin olay akabinde hemen \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmamas\u0131 ancak … s\u00fcren hamileli\u011fini saklad\u0131ktan sonra do\u011fumun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi ile birlikte kocas\u0131n\u0131n olaydan haberdar olduktan sonra \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmas\u0131, … Usta’n\u0131n san\u0131ktan hemen \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sebeplerin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygun olmamas\u0131, … Usta’n\u0131n tehdit alt\u0131nda oldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren bir durumun tespit edilememesi ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak ve mahkumiyetine yeter delil elde edilemedi\u011finden bahisle Yerel Mahkemece 2010\/308 Esas, 2011\/215 Karar ve 10\/05\/2011 tarihli karar\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 14. Ceza Dairesinin 2013\/872 Esas, 2014\/10953 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile onanmas\u0131 ile 13.10.2014 tarihinde kesinle\u015fti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n … ile gizli birliktelikleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda, kat\u0131lan …’in haberi olmadan r\u0131zas\u0131 hilaf\u0131na evine gelerek … ile cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fi, …’nin bu konudaki r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n … ba\u015f\u0131na yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fterek konuta girmede r\u0131zadan s\u00f6zedebilmek i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan …’in yasal haklar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7i\u011fnememesi zorunlu oldu\u011fu, evli bir kad\u0131nla ili\u015fki kurman\u0131n, evlilikte ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k ve sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6ng\u00f6ren T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve kocan\u0131n haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 niteli\u011fi oldu\u011fu, b\u00f6yle bir ili\u015fkinin evinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine kocan\u0131n … g\u00f6sterece\u011fi varsay\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan … ile birlikte olmak i\u00e7in kat\u0131lan … ‘in bu duruma r\u0131zas\u0131 olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilerek ve kendi r\u0131zas\u0131 ile konuta giren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 ” Konut Dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u0130hlali” su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi, her ne kadar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n … g\u00f6r\u00fclen eylemi, 7188 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunla de\u011fi\u015fiklik sonras\u0131 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 251. maddesi gere\u011fince basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda ise de, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 251\/6. maddesi olan “Mahkemece gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi halinde bu madde uyar\u0131nca h\u00fck\u00fcm verilinceye kadar her a\u015famada duru\u015fma a\u00e7mak suretiyle genel h\u00fck\u00fcmler uyar\u0131nca yarg\u0131lamaya devam edilebilir.” kanuni d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fince, Mahkemece kat\u0131lan dinlenmeksizin yani duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n karar verilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddesi basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fcn\u00fcn uygulanma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetine Yerel Mahkemece karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
San\u0131k kat\u0131lan\u0131n e\u015fi … ile beraber oldu\u011fu ve bu beraberlikten bir \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, bu birliktelik esnas\u0131nda kat\u0131lan, e\u015fi … ile ikamet ettikleri konutlar\u0131na, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n gelerek kat\u0131lan\u0131n e\u015fi ile birlikte oldu\u011fu, bu hususun …’nin ifadeleri ile do\u011fruland\u0131\u011f\u0131, me\u015fru olmayan amaca y\u00f6nelik ev sahibi r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olamayaca\u011f\u0131 nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmesinde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin us\u00fbl ve kanuna uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n toplanan t\u00fcm delillerle birlikte gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 vasf\u0131 ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz sebepleri de reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
V. KARAR<\/p>\n
Gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 11.04.2023 tarihli, 2022\/424 Esas, 2023\/121 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda san\u0131k m\u00fcdafince \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen temyiz sebepleri ve dikkate al\u0131nan sair hususlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden herhangi bir hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin temyiz sebeplerinin reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn Tebli\u011fname’ye uygun olarak, ONANMASINA, dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 21.11.2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
2. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2022\/1596 E., 2022\/11787 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etme su\u00e7undan \u015f\u00fcpheli … hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma evresi sonunda \u0130neg\u00f6l Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 19\/01\/2021 tarihli ve 2020\/7224 soru\u015fturma, 2021\/346 say\u0131l\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin mercii \u0130neg\u00f6l Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 03\/06\/2021 tarihli ve 2021\/2101 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar aleyhine Y\u00fcksek Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 14\/12\/2021 g\u00fcn ve 23957-2021 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine dayan\u0131larak dava dosyas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 21\/01\/2022 g\u00fcn ve 2021\/158339 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesiyle dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle okundu.<\/p>\n
Kanun yarar\u0131na bozma isteyen tebli\u011fnamede;
\nSomut olayda, m\u00fc\u015fteki … ile evli …n\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015fteki ceza infaz kurumunda iken beraberlik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli …’\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki ile ortak ikametlerine kabul etmesi suretiyle konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal ettikleri iddias\u0131 ile \u015fikayette bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucunda, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015f ise de,<\/p>\n
Benzer bir olay sebebiyle Yarg\u0131tay 17. Ceza Dairesinin 03\/06\/2020 tarihli ve 2020\/6815 esas, 2020\/7017 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda yer alan ” \u2026kad\u0131n e\u015fin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eve girmesine r\u0131za g\u00f6stermesi, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakalanma \u015fekli kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nun 116\/3-son c\u00fcmle ve ifade edilen evlilik birli\u011finde aile bireylerinden birinin g\u00f6sterece\u011fi r\u0131za a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n me\u015fru bir amaca y\u00f6nelik olmas\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi, bu nedenle san\u0131k R. hakk\u0131nda at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7la korunan, TCK’nun 116. maddesinin gerek\u00e7esinde \u201cKonut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali, ki\u015finin kendisine \u00f6zg\u00fc bar\u0131\u015f ve s\u00fckununu ve yuvas\u0131ndaki ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131n sulh ve selametle cereyan\u0131 i\u00e7in var olmas\u0131 gerekli g\u00fcvenlik duygusunun sars\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmektedir. Bireylere kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenen ve ayn\u0131 zamanda onlar\u0131n muhta\u00e7 olduklar\u0131 g\u00fcvenlik ve s\u00fckunu ihlal eyleyen bu fiillerin, h\u00fcrriyete kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda bir su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u201d \u015feklinde ifade edilen hukuki yarar\u0131n ihlal edilmesi sebebiyle konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi halde yerinde ve yeterli olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile beraatine karar verilmesi, Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f…” \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7ede belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, m\u00fc\u015fteki ile resmi nikahl\u0131 …n\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin cezaevinde bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada \u015f\u00fcpheli … ile birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu birliktelik esnas\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fteki … ve m\u00fc\u015fterek iki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n ikamet ettikleri konutlar\u0131na, \u015f\u00fcpheli …’\u0131n birka\u00e7 kez gelerek m\u00fc\u015ftekinin e\u015fi ile birlikte oldu\u011fu, bu hususun \u015f\u00fcpheli ve tan\u0131k ifadeleri ile do\u011fruland\u0131\u011f\u0131, me\u015fru olmayan amaca y\u00f6nelik ev sahibi r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve \u015f\u00fcphelinin m\u00fc\u015ftekinin e\u015finin evli oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fine dair beyan\u0131n\u0131n ise su\u00e7tan kurtulmaya y\u00f6nelik olup itibar edilemeyece\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u015f\u00fcphelinin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7la ilgili delillerin kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir nitelikte bulundu\u011fu, bu delillerin mahkemesince takdir ve de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 309. maddesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 l\u00fczumu kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine dayan\u0131larak ihbar olunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
GERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:<\/p>\n
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 160. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, bir su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi ihbar\u0131n\u0131 alan Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, delil toplay\u0131p maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya ba\u015flayarak, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi hususunda yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmas\u0131 halinde, ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 170\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca iddianame d\u00fczenleyip kamu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7makla, yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamas\u0131 halinde ise ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 172. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermekle g\u00f6revli bulunmaktad\u0131r. Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n karar\u0131na itiraz \u00fczerine Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fince (soru\u015fturman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi karar\u0131 verilmez ise) dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki deliller itibar\u0131yla itiraz incelenip kabul veya reddedilecektir.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda, m\u00fc\u015fteki … ile evli …n\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015fteki ceza infaz kurumunda iken beraberlik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli …\u2019nu, m\u00fc\u015fteki ile ortak ikametlerine kabul etmesi suretiyle konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlali iddias\u0131 ile \u015fikayette bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucunda, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015f ise de,<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fteki ile resmi nikahl\u0131 …n\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin cezaevinde bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada \u015f\u00fcpheli … ile birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu birliktelik esnas\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fteki … ve m\u00fc\u015fterek iki \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n ikamet ettikleri konutlar\u0131na, \u015f\u00fcphelinin birka\u00e7 kez gelerek m\u00fc\u015ftekinin e\u015fi ile birlikte oldu\u011fu, bu hususun \u015f\u00fcpheli ve tan\u0131k ifadeleri ile do\u011fruland\u0131\u011f\u0131, me\u015fru olmayan amaca y\u00f6nelik ev sahibi r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olamayaca\u011f\u0131 ve \u015f\u00fcphelinin m\u00fc\u015ftekinin e\u015finin evli oldu\u011funu bilmedi\u011fine dair beyan\u0131n\u0131n ise su\u00e7tan kurtulmaya y\u00f6nelik olup itibar edilemeyece\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u015f\u00fcphelinin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7la ilgili delillerin kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir nitelikte bulundu\u011fu, bu delillerin mahkemesince takdir ve de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesi nedeniyle kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, (\u0130NEG\u00d6L) Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011finden kesin olarak verilen 03.06.2021 tarihli ve 2021\/2101 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 309. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, ayn\u0131 maddenin 4. f\u0131kra (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca sonraki i\u015flemlerin itiraz merciince yerine getirilmesine,08\/06\/2022 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
2. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2010\/9226 E., 2011\/25386 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi
\nSU\u00c7LAR : Konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozma ve cinsel taciz
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahkumiyet<\/p>\n
Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;
\nSan\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7tan mahkum oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilebilmesi i\u00e7in aranan, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019nun 231\/6. maddesinin (a) bendinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u201ckas\u0131tl\u0131 bir su\u00e7tan mahkum olmama\u201d ko\u015fulunun bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilemeyece\u011fi belirlenerek yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceden telefonla birka\u00e7 kez birlikte olmay\u0131 teklif etmek suretiyle taciz etti\u011fi …\u2019nin san\u0131\u011f\u0131 geceleyin evine \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmas\u0131 \u015feklinde geli\u015fen olayda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lan kocan\u0131n yasal haklar\u0131na zarar verecek bi\u00e7imde konuta kad\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 ile girmesinde me\u015fru bir ama\u00e7la kat\u0131lan\u0131n evine gitmedi\u011fi ve kat\u0131lan\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n da oldu\u011fu varsay\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011fa at\u0131l\u0131 konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bozmak su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funa ili\u015fkin mahkemenin de\u011ferlendirmesinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve bu nedenle tebli\u011fnamedeki kast\u0131n konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraati gerekti\u011fine ili\u015fkin bozma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine kat\u0131l\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmaya, toplanan delillere, gerek\u00e7eye, hakimin kanaat ve takdirine g\u00f6re temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn k\u0131smen isteme ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ONANMASINA, 13\/07\/2011 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 2. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 21.11.2023 tarihli, 2023\/19981 E., 2023\/7277 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131, 08.06.2022 tarihli, 2022\/1596 E., 2022\/11787 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/p>\n
ve 13.07.2011 tarihli, 2010\/9226 E., 2011\/25386 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Ceza Dairesi 2023\/19981 E., 2023\/7277 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” B O Z M A \u00dc Z E R \u0130 N E \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2022\/424 E., 2023\/121 K. SU\u00c7 :Konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahk\u00fbmiyet TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Onama San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bozma \u00fczerine kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn; karar tarihi itibar\u0131yla 6723 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 33. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 8. maddesi gere\u011fi y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu\u2019nun 305. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 260\/1. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 310. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 317. maddesi gere\u011fi temyiz iste\u011finin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmekle gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7 1. Mu\u011fla Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 27.08.2010 tarihli ve 2010\/1864 Esas No’lu iddianamesi ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 116\/1-4, 53. maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve hak yoksunluklar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesi talebiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 2. Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 10.05.2011 tarihli ve 2010\/308 Esas, 2011\/215 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda konut dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihl\u00e2li su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 116\/4, 62. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 10 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilerek 5271 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-106200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n