T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u0130LKER TOKDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/68720)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 2\/6\/2025 – 32918<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Burak G\u00dcNG\u00d6R<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130lker TOKDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Yener YILMAZ<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, idari para cezas\u0131na ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesinin ge\u00e7ici olarak al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130neg\u00f6l \u015eehit Bekir \u00d6zcan B\u00f6lge Trafik Denetleme B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fine ba\u011fl\u0131 ekip taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan kontrollerde kandaki alkol miktar\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen cihaz\u0131 kullanmay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 5.224 TL idari para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesine iki y\u0131l el konulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, idari para cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130neg\u00f6l Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) itiraz etmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde; trafik denetimi s\u0131ras\u0131nda arac\u0131n\u0131n durduruldu\u011funu, alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcflemesinin s\u00f6ylendi\u011fini, bu i\u015flemin neden yap\u0131lmak istendi\u011fini ve i\u015flemin gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde sordu\u011fu sorulara cevap verilmeyip cihazla \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 reddetti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle hakk\u0131nda tutanak tanzim edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, sorular\u0131na kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince cevap verilmemesinin ard\u0131ndan bahse konu denetime tabi tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n yasal bir dayana\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bilgi almak i\u00e7in vekili ile konu hakk\u0131nda bilgisi olabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ki\u015fileri arad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ard\u0131ndan alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcflemek istedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fini ancak bu defa tutanak tutuldu\u011fu ve s\u00fcrecin tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek talebinin reddedildi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu; tutana\u011f\u0131 imzalamaktan imtina etmesi \u00fczerine kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince \u0130neg\u00f6l Devlet Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, burada hem alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131 ile hem de kan al\u0131nmak suretiyle \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, her iki test sonucunda da kan\u0131nda alkol bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
6. H\u00e2kimlik 18\/5\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“…itiraz edenin olay tarihinde alkol metre cihaz\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcflemeyi reddetti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde polis ekiplerince tutanak tanzim edildi\u011fi, tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011finden polis ekipleri taraf\u0131ndan, ara\u00e7 s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fcne alkol metre cihaz\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcflememenin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, polis ekipleri taraf\u0131ndan itiraz eden hakk\u0131nda alkolden red \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu haliyle kabahatlinin alkol metre cihaz\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcflemeyi reddetti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, muteriz itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen idari para cezas\u0131nda usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flem yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin olay g\u00fcn\u00fc alkoll\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015f ise de 2918 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 48\/9 maddesinde alkoll\u00fc olarak ara\u00e7 kullanman\u0131n de\u011fil; alkol metre cihaz\u0131na \u00fcflememenin yapt\u0131r\u0131ma ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131…”<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucunun H\u00e2kimli\u011fin karar\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131 inceleyen Bursa 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi de 25\/5\/2022 tarihli karar\u0131nda, \u0130neg\u00f6l Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 2022\/2441 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 itiraza konu karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuken ge\u00e7erli gerek\u00e7eleri oldu\u011funu belirterek itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015f ve idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131 kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 30\/5\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 29\/6\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Komisyon, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Silahlar\u0131n E\u015fitli\u011fi \u0130lkesinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, H\u00e2kimli\u011fin delilleri incelememesinin ve olay an\u0131na ili\u015fkin kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin incelenmesi talebini kabul etmemesinin silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesini ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi, deliller de\u011ferlendirilirken kolluk tutana\u011f\u0131na aksi ispat edilemeyecek seviyede \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nmas\u0131 hususuyla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak e\u015fitlik ilkesine ili\u015fkin ilgili hukuka ve genel ilkelere Gurbet \u00c7oban (B. No: 2019\/38857, 17\/11\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 17-39) karar\u0131nda yer vermi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re mahkemeden ba\u015fvurucunun iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 dikkate almas\u0131, bunlar\u0131 ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e ile kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131, bu iddialarda da yeterli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u015fans tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymas\u0131 beklenmektedir. \u0130dari i\u015flemlerin ve bu ba\u011flamda kamu ajanlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin hukuka\/ger\u00e7e\u011fe uygunluk karinesinden yararlanaca\u011f\u0131 hukukun bilinen bir ilkesi olmakla birlikte idari i\u015flemin hukukili\u011finin veya tutana\u011f\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin ger\u00e7ekli\u011finin dava konusu edildi\u011fi bir yarg\u0131lamada h\u00e2kimin de\u011finilen karineyi uygulamas\u0131 bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le getirecektir. \u0130dare taraf\u0131ndan tanzim edilen belgelerin i\u00e7eri\u011finin ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi karinesinin yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden belirleyici olmas\u0131 bireyi devlete kar\u015f\u0131 dezavantajl\u0131 bir konuma sokaca\u011f\u0131ndan silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesini zedeleyebilece\u011fi gibi su\u00e7 isnad\u0131yla ilgili yarg\u0131lama s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda masumiyet karinesini de ihlal edebilecektir (Gurbet \u00c7oban, \u00a7 44).<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucuya isnat edilen alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131n\u0131 kullanmay\u0131 kabul etmeme eyleminin tek ba\u015f\u0131na kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa dayan\u0131larak delillendirilmedi\u011finin, ba\u015fvurucunun gerek yarg\u0131lama gerekse bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcrecinde bahse konu kontrol\u00fc yapt\u0131rmaya \u00f6ncelikle r\u0131za g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtti\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmek gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
15. Nitekim ba\u015fvurucu, r\u0131za g\u00f6stermemesini, ilgili kollu\u011fun b\u00f6yle bir yetkisi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bahse konu denetimden imtina edip edemeyece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bilgisi olmamas\u0131na dayand\u0131rm\u0131\u015f; olay s\u00fcrecinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri sonucunda alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131na \u00fcflemeyi kabul etti\u011fini (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 3, 4) ancak bu defa hakk\u0131nda tutanak tanzim edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle talebinin reddedildi\u011fini itiraz dilek\u00e7eleri ile ba\u015fvuru formunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki cezan\u0131n alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131n\u0131 kullanmay\u0131 kabul etmeme eylemine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu hususu karar gerek\u00e7esinde (bkz. \u00a7 6) yeterli a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kta ortaya konulmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu; her ne kadar olay an\u0131nda alkoll\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun hastane s\u00fcrecinde yap\u0131lan test ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmlerle de ispatland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 (bkz. \u00a7 5) belirterek itiraz ve ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015fsa da somut olayda incelenmesi gereken eylemin hastane s\u00fcrecinin \u00f6ncesine ait oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Sonu\u00e7 olarak kamu g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011f\u0131n ger\u00e7eklik karinesinin aksi ispat edilebilir nitelikte oldu\u011fu ve bizzat ba\u015fvurucunun kendi beyanlar\u0131yla an\u0131lan tutana\u011f\u0131n do\u011fruland\u0131\u011f\u0131, nitekim ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz ve \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131n\u0131 kullanmay\u0131 kabul etmeme eylemine ili\u015fkin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddialar\u0131n tutana\u011f\u0131n aksini ispatlamaya y\u00f6nelik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvurucunun talebine ra\u011fmen olay an\u0131na ili\u015fkin kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmedi\u011fi \u015fik\u00e2yetini de i\u00e7eren ba\u015fvurusunda, somut olayda ba\u015fvurucuya savunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu, H\u00e2kimli\u011fin kamu g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131yan bir yakla\u015f\u0131m i\u00e7inde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucuyu kamu otoritesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda dezavantajl\u0131 konuma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden bahsedilemeyece\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesinin ihlal edilmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. Makul S\u00fcrede Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinin makul olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilirken yarg\u0131laman\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ka\u00e7 dereceli oldu\u011fu, taraflar\u0131n ve ilgili makamlar\u0131n yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki tutumu ve ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndaki menfaatinin niteli\u011fi gibi hususlar dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r (B.E., B. No: 2012\/625, 9\/1\/2014, \u00a7 29).<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n, davan\u0131n iki dereceli bir yarg\u0131lama sisteminde yakla\u015f\u0131k 2 ay s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinin b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bir ihlalin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesinin \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 20\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 20\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/68720 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR \u0130LKER TOKDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/68720) Karar Tarihi: 20\/11\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 2\/6\/2025 – 32918 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Burak G\u00dcNG\u00d6R Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130lker TOKDEM\u0130R Vekili : Av. Yener YILMAZ I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, idari para cezas\u0131na ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesinin ge\u00e7ici olarak al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u0130neg\u00f6l \u015eehit Bekir \u00d6zcan B\u00f6lge Trafik Denetleme B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fine ba\u011fl\u0131 ekip taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan kontrollerde kandaki alkol miktar\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen cihaz\u0131 kullanmay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 5.224 TL idari para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesine iki y\u0131l el konulmu\u015ftur. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, idari para cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130neg\u00f6l Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) itiraz etmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde; trafik denetimi s\u0131ras\u0131nda arac\u0131n\u0131n durduruldu\u011funu, alkol \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm cihaz\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcflemesinin s\u00f6ylendi\u011fini, bu i\u015flemin neden yap\u0131lmak istendi\u011fini ve i\u015flemin gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde sordu\u011fu sorulara cevap verilmeyip cihazla \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 reddetti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle hakk\u0131nda tutanak tanzim edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, sorular\u0131na kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince cevap verilmemesinin ard\u0131ndan bahse konu denetime tabi tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n yasal bir dayana\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bilgi almak i\u00e7in vekili ile konu hakk\u0131nda bilgisi olabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ki\u015fileri …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-104015","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n